Runge Eik, Jensen Esben Kjems, Mathiasen Kim, Larsen Pia Veldt, Hertz Søren Peter Thygesen, Holmberg Trine Theresa, Tarp Kristine, Linnet Jakob, Lichtenstein Mia Beck
Mental Health Services in the Region of Southern Denmark, Research Unit for Digital Psychiatry, Centre for Digital Psychiatry, Odense, Denmark.
Department of Clinical Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Oct 6;13:969338. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.969338. eCollection 2022.
Lack of motivation is widely acknowledged as a significant factor in treatment discontinuity and poor treatment outcomes in eating disorders. Treatment adherence is lower in internet-based treatment. The current study aimed to assess the relationship between treatment motivation and treatment outcomes in an internet-based therapist-guided intervention for Binge Eating Disorder (BED).
Adults ( = 153) with mild to moderate symptoms of BED participated in a 10-session internet-based treatment program. Baseline and between-session scores of "Readiness to change" and "Belief in change" were used to predict treatment completion and eating disorder symptom reduction (EDE-Q Global, BED-Q, and weekly number of binge eating episodes) at post-treatment.
Baseline treatment motivation could not predict treatment completion or symptom reduction. Early measures of treatment motivation (regression slope from sessions 1-5) significantly predicted both treatment completion and post-treatment symptom reduction. "Belief in change" was the strongest predictor for completing treatment (OR = 2.18, 95%-CI: 1.06, 4.46) and reducing symptoms (EDE-Q Global: = -0.53, = 0.001; number of weekly binge eating episodes: = 0.81, < 0.01).
The results indicated that patients entering online treatment for BED feel highly motivated. However, baseline treatment motivation could not significantly predict treatment completion, which contradicts previous research. The significant predictive ability of early measures of treatment motivation supports the clinical relevance of monitoring the development of early changes to tailor and optimize individual patient care. Further research is needed to examine treatment motivation in regard to internet-based treatment for BED with more validated measures.
缺乏动机被广泛认为是饮食失调治疗中断和治疗效果不佳的一个重要因素。基于互联网的治疗中治疗依从性较低。本研究旨在评估在基于互联网的由治疗师指导的暴食症(BED)干预中治疗动机与治疗效果之间的关系。
153名有轻度至中度BED症状的成年人参加了一个为期10节的基于互联网的治疗项目。使用“改变的准备度”和“对改变的信念”的基线及治疗期间得分来预测治疗结束时的治疗完成情况和饮食失调症状减轻情况(EDE-Q总分、BED-Q以及每周暴食发作次数)。
基线治疗动机无法预测治疗完成情况或症状减轻情况。治疗动机的早期测量指标(第1至5节的回归斜率)显著预测了治疗完成情况和治疗后症状减轻情况。“对改变的信念”是完成治疗(OR = 2.18,95%置信区间:1.06,4.46)和减轻症状(EDE-Q总分:β = -0.53,p = 0.001;每周暴食发作次数:β = 0.81,p < 0.01)的最强预测因素。
结果表明,进入BED在线治疗的患者动机很高。然而,基线治疗动机无法显著预测治疗完成情况,这与先前的研究相矛盾。治疗动机早期测量指标的显著预测能力支持了监测早期变化发展以定制和优化个体患者护理的临床相关性。需要进一步研究以使用更有效的测量方法来研究BED基于互联网治疗的治疗动机。