• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

日本矫形外科学会下腰痛评估问卷(JOABPEQ)用于下背部疾病:来自伊朗的一项效度研究。

The Japanese Orthopedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ) for low back disorders: a validation study from Iran.

作者信息

Azimi Parisa, Shahzadi Sohrab, Montazeri Ali

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

J Orthop Sci. 2012 Sep;17(5):521-5. doi: 10.1007/s00776-012-0267-z. Epub 2012 Jul 21.

DOI:10.1007/s00776-012-0267-z
PMID:22821408
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Lumbar disc hernia (LDH) and lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) are the most common diagnoses of low back and leg pain symptoms. The Japanese Orthopedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ) is a measure of health-related quality of life in these patients. This study aimed to cross-culturally translate and validate the JOABPEQ in Iran.

METHODS

This was a prospective clinical validation study. The translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the original questionnaire was performed in accordance with published guidelines. A total of 103 patients with LDH or LSS were asked to respond to the questionnaire at two points in time: pre- and postoperative assessments (6 months follow-up). To test reliability, the internal consistency was assessed by Cronbach's alpha coefficient, and validity was assessed using convergent validity. Responsiveness to change was also assessed comparing patients' pre- and postoperative scores.

RESULTS

The Cronbach's alpha coefficients for the JOABPEQ at pre- and postoperative assessments ranged from 0.71 to 0.81, indicating a good internal consistency for the questionnaire. In addition, the correlation of each item with its hypothesized subscale of the JOABPEQ showed satisfactory results, suggesting that the items had a substantial association with the subscale representing the concept. Further analysis also indicated that the questionnaire was responsive to change (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

In general, the Iranian version of JOABPEQ performed well, and the findings suggest that it is a reliable and valid measure of back pain evaluation among LDH and LCS patients.

摘要

背景

腰椎间盘突出症(LDH)和腰椎管狭窄症(LSS)是腰腿痛症状最常见的诊断。日本骨科协会背痛评估问卷(JOABPEQ)是衡量这些患者健康相关生活质量的一种方法。本研究旨在对JOABPEQ进行跨文化翻译并在伊朗进行验证。

方法

这是一项前瞻性临床验证研究。原始问卷的翻译和跨文化改编按照已发表的指南进行。总共103例LDH或LSS患者被要求在两个时间点回答问卷:术前和术后评估(6个月随访)。为了测试信度,通过Cronbach's α系数评估内部一致性,并使用收敛效度评估效度。还通过比较患者术前和术后得分来评估对变化的反应性。

结果

术前和术后评估时JOABPEQ的Cronbach's α系数范围为0.71至0.81,表明问卷具有良好的内部一致性。此外,JOABPEQ各项目与其假设子量表的相关性显示出令人满意的结果,表明这些项目与代表该概念的子量表有实质性关联。进一步分析还表明问卷对变化有反应(P < 0.0001)。

结论

总体而言,伊朗版JOABPEQ表现良好,研究结果表明它是评估LDH和LCS患者背痛的可靠且有效的方法。

相似文献

1
The Japanese Orthopedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ) for low back disorders: a validation study from Iran.日本矫形外科学会下腰痛评估问卷(JOABPEQ)用于下背部疾病:来自伊朗的一项效度研究。
J Orthop Sci. 2012 Sep;17(5):521-5. doi: 10.1007/s00776-012-0267-z. Epub 2012 Jul 21.
2
An outcome measure of functionality and pain in patients with lumbar disc herniation: a validation study of the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score.腰椎间盘突出症患者功能和疼痛的结局指标:日本矫形外科学会(JOA)评分的验证研究
J Orthop Sci. 2012 Jul;17(4):341-5. doi: 10.1007/s00776-012-0232-x. Epub 2012 Apr 27.
3
The Japanese Orthopedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ): A validation of the reliability of the Thai version.日本矫形外科学会背痛评估问卷(JOABPEQ):泰语版可靠性验证
J Orthop Sci. 2017 Jan;22(1):34-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2016.10.001. Epub 2016 Oct 25.
4
An outcome measure of functionality and pain in patients with low back disorder: A validation study of the Iranian version of Core Outcome Measures Index.下背部疾病患者功能和疼痛的结局指标:伊朗版核心结局指标指数的验证研究
Asian J Neurosurg. 2015 Jan-Mar;10(1):46. doi: 10.4103/1793-5482.151511.
5
Severity of symptoms, physical functioning and satisfaction in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: a validation study of the Iranian version of the Swiss Spinal Stenosis Score.腰椎管狭窄症患者的症状严重程度、身体功能及满意度:瑞士腰椎管狭窄症评分伊朗版的验证研究
J Neurosurg Sci. 2014 Sep;58(3):177-82.
6
A comparison between the low back pain scales for patients with lumbar disc herniation: validity, reliability, and responsiveness.腰椎间盘突出症患者腰痛量表的比较:效度、信度和反应度。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Jun 10;18(1):175. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01403-2.
7
Evaluation of low back pain using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire for lumbar spinal disease in a multicenter study: differences in scores based on age, sex, and type of disease.多中心研究中使用日本骨科学会腰椎疾病下背痛评估问卷对下背痛进行评估:基于年龄、性别和疾病类型的评分差异
J Orthop Sci. 2010 Jan;15(1):86-91. doi: 10.1007/s00776-009-1426-8. Epub 2010 Feb 12.
8
The validity and reliability of the Arabic version of the Japanese Orthopedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire: Can we implement it in Saudi Arabia?日本矫形外科学会背痛评估问卷阿拉伯语版本的有效性和可靠性:我们能在沙特阿拉伯应用它吗?
J Orthop Sci. 2017 Jul;22(4):618-621. doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2017.04.001. Epub 2017 Apr 13.
9
An outcome measure of functionality and quality of life in Iranian women with osteoporotic vertebral fractures: a validation study of the QUALEFFO-41.伊朗骨质疏松性椎体骨折女性功能与生活质量的一项结局指标:QUALEFFO-41的验证研究
J Orthop Sci. 2014 Nov;19(6):860-7. doi: 10.1007/s00776-014-0609-0. Epub 2014 Jul 29.
10
Psychometric validation of the adapted Traditional Chinese version of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ).日本矫形外科学会背痛评估问卷(JOABPEQ)改编中文版的心理测量学验证。
J Orthop Sci. 2018 Sep;23(5):750-757. doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2018.04.014. Epub 2018 Jun 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and Validation of Machine Learning-Based Predictive Model for Prolonged Hospital Stay after Decompression Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis.基于机器学习的腰椎管狭窄减压术后长期住院预测模型的开发与验证
Spine Surg Relat Res. 2024 Feb 14;8(3):315-321. doi: 10.22603/ssrr.2023-0255. eCollection 2024 May 27.
2
Value of Spinal Infection Treatment Evaluation Score, Pola Classification, and Brighton Spondylodiscitis Score from Decision to Surgery in Patients with Spondylodiscitis: A Receiver-Operating Characteristic Curve Analysis.从决策到手术治疗椎体骨髓炎患者时,脊柱感染治疗评估评分、波拉分类法及布莱顿脊椎间盘炎评分的价值:一项受试者工作特征曲线分析
Asian Spine J. 2024 Apr;18(2):218-226. doi: 10.31616/asj.2023.0317. Epub 2024 Apr 23.
3
Autograft and allograft bone chips interbody fusion for spondylodiscitis: Surgery outcomes.自体骨与同种异体骨碎骨片椎间融合术治疗脊椎椎间盘炎:手术结果
Caspian J Intern Med. 2023 Winter;14(1):133-137. doi: 10.22088/cjim.14.1.133.
4
A comparison between the low back pain scales for patients with lumbar disc herniation: validity, reliability, and responsiveness.腰椎间盘突出症患者腰痛量表的比较:效度、信度和反应度。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Jun 10;18(1):175. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01403-2.
5
A Survey on the Short-term Outcome of Microlumbar Discectomy with General versus Spinal Anesthesia.全麻与椎管内麻醉行微创腰椎间盘切除术的短期疗效观察
Clin Orthop Surg. 2019 Dec;11(4):422-426. doi: 10.4055/cios.2019.11.4.422. Epub 2019 Nov 12.
6
Determination of minimally clinically important differences for JOABPEQ measure after discectomy in patients with lumbar disc herniation.腰椎间盘突出症患者椎间盘切除术后 JOABPEQ 测量的最小临床重要差异的确定。
J Spine Surg. 2018 Mar;4(1):102-108. doi: 10.21037/jss.2018.03.11.
7
The Low-Back Outcome Scale and the Oswestry disability index: are they reflective of patient satisfaction after discectomy? A cross sectional study.下背部结果量表和奥斯维斯特里残疾指数:它们能反映椎间盘切除术后患者的满意度吗?一项横断面研究。
J Spine Surg. 2017 Dec;3(4):554-560. doi: 10.21037/jss.2017.09.07.
8
Cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire to Brazilian Portuguese.日本骨科学会腰痛评估问卷的巴西葡萄牙语文化适应性、信度和效度
Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2017 Jul-Sep;15(3):313-321. doi: 10.1590/S1679-45082017AO3890.
9
Preliminary Results of Relationship between Preoperative Walking Ability and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Morphology in Patients with Lumbar Canal Stenosis: Comparison between Trefoil and Triangle Types of Spinal Stenosis.腰椎管狭窄症患者术前步行能力与磁共振成像形态学关系的初步结果:三叶形与三角形椎管狭窄类型的比较
Asian Spine J. 2017 Aug;11(4):580-585. doi: 10.4184/asj.2017.11.4.580. Epub 2017 Aug 7.
10
The reliability and validity of the Korean version of the Japanese orthopaedic association back pain evaluation questionnaire.日本矫形外科学会背痛评估问卷韩文版的信度和效度
J Phys Ther Sci. 2017 Jul;29(7):1250-1253. doi: 10.1589/jpts.29.1250. Epub 2017 Jul 15.