• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

日本矫形外科学会背痛评估问卷(JOABPEQ):泰语版可靠性验证

The Japanese Orthopedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ): A validation of the reliability of the Thai version.

作者信息

Poosiripinyo Thanate, Paholpak Permsak, Jirarattanaphochai Kitti, Kosuwon Weerachai, Sirichativapee Winai, Wisanuyotin Taweechok, Laupattarakasem Pat, Sukhonthamarn Kamolsak, Jeeravipoolvarn Polasak, Sakakibara Toshihiko, Kasai Yuichi

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, 40002, Thailand.

Department of Orthopedics, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, 40002, Thailand.

出版信息

J Orthop Sci. 2017 Jan;22(1):34-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2016.10.001. Epub 2016 Oct 25.

DOI:10.1016/j.jos.2016.10.001
PMID:27793440
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Japanese Orthopedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ) was developed by the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) for assessment of lower back pain and lumbar spinal disease. We aimed to translate the JOABPEQ into Thai and test its reliability and validity in the Thai context.

METHODS

The original JOABPEQ was translated into Thai in accordance with international recommendations. Then 180 lumbar spinal disease patients (mean age 58.58 ± 11.97, 68.3% female) were asked to complete the Thai version of the JOABPEQ twice at 2-week intervals. Test-retest reliability was analyzed using the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). Internal consistencies were analyzed using Cronbach's alpha, while the construct validity was compared with the Thai version of the modified SF-36, and tested using the Spearman's rank correlation coefficient.

RESULTS

The Thai JOABPEQ showed satisfactory test-retest reliability in all parameters (Intra-class Correlation Coefficient 0.761-0.862). The variables low back pain, walking ability, social life function, and mental health had satisfactory internal consistency (the respective Cronbach's α was 0.798, 0.721, 0.707, and 0.795). Only the lumbar function parameter showed moderate reliability (Cronbach's α = 0.654). All of the variables in the Thai JOABPEQ had a statistically positive correlation with the correspondent Thai SF-36 subscales (Spearman's rank correlation p value < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The Thai version of JOABPEQ had satisfactory internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and construct validity; it can be used as a reliable tool for assessing quality of life for lumbar spinal disease patients in Thailand.

摘要

背景

日本矫形外科学会背痛评估问卷(JOABPEQ)由日本矫形外科学会(JOA)制定,用于评估下背痛和腰椎疾病。我们旨在将JOABPEQ翻译成泰语,并在泰国背景下测试其信度和效度。

方法

按照国际建议将原始的JOABPEQ翻译成泰语。然后,180名腰椎疾病患者(平均年龄58.58±11.97岁,女性占68.3%)被要求每隔2周完成两次泰语版的JOABPEQ。使用组内相关系数(ICC)分析重测信度。使用克朗巴哈系数分析内部一致性,同时将结构效度与泰语版的改良SF - 36进行比较,并使用斯皮尔曼等级相关系数进行测试。

结果

泰语版JOABPEQ在所有参数上均显示出令人满意的重测信度(组内相关系数为0.761 - 0.862)。下背痛、行走能力、社会生活功能和心理健康等变量具有令人满意的内部一致性(各自的克朗巴哈α系数分别为0.798、0.721、0.707和0.795)。只有腰椎功能参数显示出中等信度(克朗巴哈α系数 = 0.654)。泰语版JOABPEQ中的所有变量与相应的泰语SF - 36分量表均具有统计学上的正相关(斯皮尔曼等级相关p值 < 0.05)。

结论

泰语版JOABPEQ具有令人满意的内部一致性、重测信度和结构效度;它可以作为评估泰国腰椎疾病患者生活质量的可靠工具。

相似文献

1
The Japanese Orthopedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ): A validation of the reliability of the Thai version.日本矫形外科学会背痛评估问卷(JOABPEQ):泰语版可靠性验证
J Orthop Sci. 2017 Jan;22(1):34-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2016.10.001. Epub 2016 Oct 25.
2
Validation of the reliability of the Thai version of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire (JOACMEQ).日本骨科学会颈椎病评估问卷(JOACMEQ)泰语版可靠性的验证。
J Orthop Sci. 2016 Mar;21(2):124-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2015.12.017. Epub 2016 Jan 21.
3
Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the reliability of the Thai version of the Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS).《髋关节功能障碍与骨关节炎疗效评分(HOOS)泰语版的跨文化适应及信度验证》
Rheumatol Int. 2016 Oct;36(10):1455-8. doi: 10.1007/s00296-016-3505-4. Epub 2016 Jun 4.
4
The validity and reliability of the Arabic version of the Japanese Orthopedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire: Can we implement it in Saudi Arabia?日本矫形外科学会背痛评估问卷阿拉伯语版本的有效性和可靠性:我们能在沙特阿拉伯应用它吗?
J Orthop Sci. 2017 Jul;22(4):618-621. doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2017.04.001. Epub 2017 Apr 13.
5
Psychometric validation of the adapted Traditional Chinese version of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ).日本矫形外科学会背痛评估问卷(JOABPEQ)改编中文版的心理测量学验证。
J Orthop Sci. 2018 Sep;23(5):750-757. doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2018.04.014. Epub 2018 Jun 29.
6
The Japanese Orthopedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ) for low back disorders: a validation study from Iran.日本矫形外科学会下腰痛评估问卷(JOABPEQ)用于下背部疾病:来自伊朗的一项效度研究。
J Orthop Sci. 2012 Sep;17(5):521-5. doi: 10.1007/s00776-012-0267-z. Epub 2012 Jul 21.
7
Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire.日本矫形外科学会背痛评估问卷土耳其语版本的跨文化适应、信度和效度
J Orthop Sci. 2016 May;21(3):295-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2016.01.006. Epub 2016 Feb 15.
8
Evaluation of low back pain using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire for lumbar spinal disease in a multicenter study: differences in scores based on age, sex, and type of disease.多中心研究中使用日本骨科学会腰椎疾病下背痛评估问卷对下背痛进行评估:基于年龄、性别和疾病类型的评分差异
J Orthop Sci. 2010 Jan;15(1):86-91. doi: 10.1007/s00776-009-1426-8. Epub 2010 Feb 12.
9
A comparison between the low back pain scales for patients with lumbar disc herniation: validity, reliability, and responsiveness.腰椎间盘突出症患者腰痛量表的比较:效度、信度和反应度。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Jun 10;18(1):175. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01403-2.
10
Simplified Chinese Version of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire: Cross-cultural Adaptation, Reliability, and Validity for Patients With Low Back Pain.日本矫形协会腰痛评估问卷简体中文版:腰痛患者的跨文化适应性、信度和效度。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018 Mar 15;43(6):E357-E364. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002424.

引用本文的文献

1
Comprehensive Assessment of Indirect Decompression Through Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Japanese Orthopedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire-Based Analysis.基于日本矫形外科学会背痛评估问卷的分析:对腰椎侧方椎间融合术间接减压治疗退变性腰椎管狭窄症的综合评估
Global Spine J. 2025 Mar;15(2):656-667. doi: 10.1177/21925682231204254. Epub 2023 Sep 26.
2
The impact of sarcopenia on low back pain and quality of life in patients with osteoporosis.肌少症对骨质疏松症患者腰痛和生活质量的影响。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Feb 11;23(1):142. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05086-2.
3
Examination of the regression model to quantify the degree of low back pain and lower limb symptoms in patients with lumbar disc herniation by the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ).
采用日本矫形外科学会腰痛疾患疗效评价问卷(JOABPEQ)对腰椎间盘突出症患者的腰痛和下肢症状进行量化的回归模型检查。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 14;15(12):e0243861. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243861. eCollection 2020.
4
A comparison between the low back pain scales for patients with lumbar disc herniation: validity, reliability, and responsiveness.腰椎间盘突出症患者腰痛量表的比较:效度、信度和反应度。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Jun 10;18(1):175. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01403-2.
5
Cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire to Brazilian Portuguese.日本骨科学会腰痛评估问卷的巴西葡萄牙语文化适应性、信度和效度
Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2017 Jul-Sep;15(3):313-321. doi: 10.1590/S1679-45082017AO3890.
6
The reliability and validity of the Korean version of the Japanese orthopaedic association back pain evaluation questionnaire.日本矫形外科学会背痛评估问卷韩文版的信度和效度
J Phys Ther Sci. 2017 Jul;29(7):1250-1253. doi: 10.1589/jpts.29.1250. Epub 2017 Jul 15.