日本矫形外科学会背痛评估问卷韩文版的信度和效度
The reliability and validity of the Korean version of the Japanese orthopaedic association back pain evaluation questionnaire.
作者信息
Jung Kyoung-Sim, Jung Jin-Hwa, Jang Sang-Hun, Bang Hyun-Soo, In Tae-Sung
机构信息
Department of Occupational Therapy, Semyung University, Republic of Korea.
Department of Physical Therapy, Gimcheon University, Republic of Korea.
出版信息
J Phys Ther Sci. 2017 Jul;29(7):1250-1253. doi: 10.1589/jpts.29.1250. Epub 2017 Jul 15.
Abstract
[Purpose] The purpose of this study was to establish the reliability and validity of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ) translated into Korean for use with patients' low back pain. [Subjects and Methods] Sixty-two subjects with low back pain, 28 men and 34 women, participated in the study. Reliability was determined by using the intra class correlation coefficient and Cronbach's alpha for internal consistency. Validity was examined by correlating the JOABPEQ scores with the 36 item short form health survey (SF 36). [Results] Test-retest reliability was 0.75-0.83. The criterion-related validity was established by comparison with the Korean version of the SF 36. [Conclusion] The Korean version of the JOABPEQ was shown to be a reliable and valid instrument for assessing low back pain.
摘要
[目的] 本研究旨在确定翻译成韩语的日本矫形外科学会腰痛评估问卷（JOABPEQ）用于评估患者腰痛时的信度和效度。[对象与方法] 62例腰痛患者参与了本研究，其中男性28例，女性34例。通过组内相关系数和用于内部一致性的克朗巴哈系数来确定信度。通过将JOABPEQ得分与36项简短健康调查问卷（SF-36）进行相关性分析来检验效度。[结果] 重测信度为0.75 - 0.83。通过与韩语版SF-36比较建立了效标关联效度。[结论] 韩语版JOABPEQ被证明是评估腰痛的一种可靠且有效的工具。
相似文献
1
The reliability and validity of the Korean version of the Japanese orthopaedic association back pain evaluation questionnaire.日本矫形外科学会背痛评估问卷韩文版的信度和效度
J Phys Ther Sci. 2017 Jul;29(7):1250-1253. doi: 10.1589/jpts.29.1250. Epub 2017 Jul 15.
2
The Japanese Orthopedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ): A validation of the reliability of the Thai version.日本矫形外科学会背痛评估问卷（JOABPEQ）：泰语版可靠性验证
J Orthop Sci. 2017 Jan;22(1):34-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2016.10.001. Epub 2016 Oct 25.
3
Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire.日本矫形外科学会背痛评估问卷土耳其语版本的跨文化适应、信度和效度
J Orthop Sci. 2016 May;21(3):295-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2016.01.006. Epub 2016 Feb 15.
4
Psychometric validation of the adapted Traditional Chinese version of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ).日本矫形外科学会背痛评估问卷（JOABPEQ）改编中文版的心理测量学验证。
J Orthop Sci. 2018 Sep;23(5):750-757. doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2018.04.014. Epub 2018 Jun 29.
5
The validity and reliability of the Arabic version of the Japanese Orthopedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire: Can we implement it in Saudi Arabia?日本矫形外科学会背痛评估问卷阿拉伯语版本的有效性和可靠性：我们能在沙特阿拉伯应用它吗？
J Orthop Sci. 2017 Jul;22(4):618-621. doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2017.04.001. Epub 2017 Apr 13.
6
The reliability and validity of the Korean version of the foot function index for patients with foot complaints.针对足部不适患者的韩文版足部功能指数的信效度研究。
J Phys Ther Sci. 2017 Jan;29(1):53-56. doi: 10.1589/jpts.29.53. Epub 2017 Jan 30.
7
The reliability and validity of the Korean version of the lower limb functional index.韩国版下肢功能指数的信度和效度。
J Phys Ther Sci. 2018 Jan;30(1):50-52. doi: 10.1589/jpts.30.50. Epub 2018 Jan 27.
8
The reliability and validity of the Korean version of the spine functional index.韩国版脊柱功能指数的信度和效度。
J Phys Ther Sci. 2017 Jun;29(6):1082-1084. doi: 10.1589/jpts.29.1082. Epub 2017 Jun 7.
9
The reliability and validity of the Korean version of the Upper Limb Functional Index.上肢功能指数韩文版的信度和效度。
J Phys Ther Sci. 2017 Jun;29(6):1062-1065. doi: 10.1589/jpts.29.1062. Epub 2017 Jun 7.
10
The Japanese Orthopedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ) for low back disorders: a validation study from Iran.日本矫形外科学会下腰痛评估问卷（JOABPEQ）用于下背部疾病：来自伊朗的一项效度研究。
J Orthop Sci. 2012 Sep;17(5):521-5. doi: 10.1007/s00776-012-0267-z. Epub 2012 Jul 21.
引用本文的文献
1
Development and Validation of Machine Learning-Based Predictive Model for Prolonged Hospital Stay after Decompression Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis.基于机器学习的腰椎管狭窄减压术后长期住院预测模型的开发与验证
Spine Surg Relat Res. 2024 Feb 14;8(3):315-321. doi: 10.22603/ssrr.2023-0255. eCollection 2024 May 27.
2
Comprehensive Assessment of Indirect Decompression Through Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Japanese Orthopedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire-Based Analysis.基于日本矫形外科学会背痛评估问卷的分析：对腰椎侧方椎间融合术间接减压治疗退变性腰椎管狭窄症的综合评估
Global Spine J. 2025 Mar;15(2):656-667. doi: 10.1177/21925682231204254. Epub 2023 Sep 26.
3
Effect of Combined Traditional Acupuncture, Pharmacopuncture and Applied Kinesiology on Lumbar Diseases of Resident Patients.传统针灸、药针疗法与应用运动机能学联合治疗住院患者腰椎疾病的效果
J Pharmacopuncture. 2019 Sep;22(3):184-191. doi: 10.3831/KPI.2019.22.025. Epub 2019 Sep 30.
本文引用的文献
1
The Japanese Orthopedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ): A validation of the reliability of the Thai version.日本矫形外科学会背痛评估问卷（JOABPEQ）：泰语版可靠性验证
J Orthop Sci. 2017 Jan;22(1):34-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2016.10.001. Epub 2016 Oct 25.
2
Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire.日本矫形外科学会背痛评估问卷土耳其语版本的跨文化适应、信度和效度
J Orthop Sci. 2016 May;21(3):295-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2016.01.006. Epub 2016 Feb 15.
3
The Japanese Orthopedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ) for low back disorders: a validation study from Iran.日本矫形外科学会下腰痛评估问卷（JOABPEQ）用于下背部疾病：来自伊朗的一项效度研究。
J Orthop Sci. 2012 Sep;17(5):521-5. doi: 10.1007/s00776-012-0267-z. Epub 2012 Jul 21.
4
Content comparison of questionnaires and scales used in low back pain based on the international classification of functioning, disability and health: a systematic review.基于国际功能、残疾和健康分类的下腰痛问卷和量表内容比较：系统评价。
Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34(14):1167-77. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2011.637602. Epub 2012 Mar 12.
5
A systematic review of the global prevalence of low back pain.一项关于全球腰痛患病率的系统评价。
Arthritis Rheum. 2012 Jun;64(6):2028-37. doi: 10.1002/art.34347. Epub 2012 Jan 9.
6
Low back pain in primary care: costs of care and prediction of future health care utilization.基层医疗中的下背痛：医疗成本和未来医疗利用的预测。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Aug 15;35(18):1714-20. doi: 10.1097/brs.0b013e3181cd656f.
7
Assessing dimensionality and responsiveness of outcomes measures for patients with low back pain.评估腰痛患者结局测量指标的维度和反应度。
Pain Pract. 2011 Jan-Feb;11(1):57-69. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-2500.2010.00390.x.
8
The quality of spine surgery from the patient's perspective: part 2. Minimal clinically important difference for improvement and deterioration as measured with the Core Outcome Measures Index.从患者角度看脊柱手术的质量：第2部分。用核心结局指标指数衡量改善和恶化的最小临床重要差异
Eur Spine J. 2009 Aug;18 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):374-9. doi: 10.1007/s00586-009-0931-y. Epub 2009 Mar 19.
9
Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire. Part 3. Validity study and establishment of the measurement scale : Subcommittee on Low Back Pain and Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation of the Clinical Outcome Committee of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association, Japan.日本骨科学会腰痛评估问卷。第3部分。效度研究与测量量表的建立：日本骨科学会临床结果委员会下腰痛与颈椎病脊髓病评估小组委员会，日本。
J Orthop Sci. 2008 May;13(3):173-9. doi: 10.1007/s00776-008-1213-y. Epub 2008 Jun 6.
10
Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire. Part 2. Verification of its reliability : The Subcommittee on Low Back Pain and Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation of the Clinical Outcome Committee of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association.日本矫形外科学会背痛评估问卷。第2部分。其可靠性验证：日本矫形外科学会临床结果委员会下腰痛和颈椎病脊髓病评估小组委员会。
J Orthop Sci. 2007 Nov;12(6):526-32. doi: 10.1007/s00776-007-1168-4. Epub 2007 Nov 30.
Zotero 插件