Department of Genetics, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Ecol Evol. 2012 Mar;2(3):493-500. doi: 10.1002/ece3.94.
Divergence time studies rely on calibration information from several sources. The age of volcanic islands is one of the standard references to obtain chronological data to estimate the absolute times of lineage diversifications. This strategy assumes that cladogenesis is necessarily associated with island formation, and punctual calibrations are commonly used to date the splits of endemic island species. Here, we re-examined three studies that inferred divergence times for different Hawaiian lineages assuming fixed calibration points. We show that, by permitting probabilistic calibrations, some divergences are estimated to be significantly younger or older than the age of the island formation, thus yielding distinct ecological scenarios for the speciation process. The results highlight the importance of using calibration information correctly, as well as the possibility of incorporating volcanic island studies into a formal, biogeographical hypothesis-testing framework.
分歧时间研究依赖于来自多个来源的校准信息。火山岛的年龄是获得时间数据的标准参考之一,用于估计谱系分歧的绝对时间。该策略假设分支发生必然与岛屿形成有关,并且通常使用定点校准来为特有岛屿物种的分裂日期。在这里,我们重新检查了三项研究,这些研究假设固定的校准点来推断不同夏威夷谱系的分歧时间。我们表明,通过允许概率校准,可以估计某些分歧的年龄比岛屿形成的年龄要年轻或年长得多,从而为物种形成过程提供了不同的生态场景。结果强调了正确使用校准信息的重要性,以及将火山岛研究纳入正式的生物地理假设检验框架的可能性。