• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

温暖优先于能力:一种有动机的偏见?

Primacy of warmth versus competence: a motivated bias?

机构信息

University of Milan-Bicocca, Faculty of Psychology, Piazza dell'Ateneo Nuovo, 1-20126 Milan, Italy.

出版信息

J Soc Psychol. 2012 Jul-Aug;152(4):417-35. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2011.623735.

DOI:10.1080/00224545.2011.623735
PMID:22822683
Abstract

In line with previous results that challenge the traditional primacy of warmth over competence in outgroup perception, we propose to bridge elements from stereotype content model and social identity theory: Perceivers will use the competence and warmth dimensions differentially when interpreting higher or lower status outgroup members' behavior. We test the hypothesis that the dimension that is less favorable for the outgroup and more favorable for the ingroup will be used. In particular, we investigate whether the warmth dimension would better predict the interpretation of higher status outgroup members' behavior than the competence dimension, whereas the competence dimension would better predict the interpretation of lower status outgroup members' behavior than the warmth dimension. Two studies separately test these effects. Results suggest the existence of a motivated bias in interpreting outgroup members' behavior, especially when there is ingroup identification.

摘要

与先前挑战对外群体感知中温暖优先于能力这一传统观点的结果一致,我们提出将刻板印象内容模型和社会认同理论的要素结合起来:当解释高地位或低地位外群体成员的行为时,感知者将对外群体成员的行为使用能力和温暖这两个维度进行不同的解读。我们测试了这样一个假设,即对外群体不利而对内群体有利的维度将被使用。具体来说,我们研究了温暖维度是否比能力维度更好地预测对高地位外群体成员行为的解释,而能力维度是否比温暖维度更好地预测对低地位外群体成员行为的解释。两项研究分别检验了这些影响。结果表明,在解释外群体成员的行为时存在一种有动机的偏见,尤其是在存在群体认同时。

相似文献

1
Primacy of warmth versus competence: a motivated bias?温暖优先于能力:一种有动机的偏见?
J Soc Psychol. 2012 Jul-Aug;152(4):417-35. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2011.623735.
2
Striving for success in outgroup settings: effects of contextually emphasizing ingroup dimensions on stigmatized group members' social identity and performance styles.在外群体环境中追求成功:情境性强调内群体维度对受污名化群体成员社会认同和表现风格的影响。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2006 May;32(5):576-88. doi: 10.1177/0146167205283336.
3
The Dynamics of Compensation: When Ingroup Favoritism Paves the Way for Outgroup Praise.群体内偏爱如何为群体外赞扬铺平道路:补偿的动态变化。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2017 May;43(5):587-600. doi: 10.1177/0146167216689066. Epub 2017 Feb 1.
4
The other side of we: when outgroup members express common identity.“我们”的另一面:当外群体成员表达共同身份时。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2008 Dec;34(12):1613-26. doi: 10.1177/0146167208323600. Epub 2008 Oct 1.
5
The stereotype consistency effect is moderated by group membership and trait valence.刻板印象一致性效应受到群体归属和特质效价的调节。
J Soc Psychol. 2013 Jan-Feb;153(1):51-61. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2012.703710.
6
Self-stereotyping: the central role of an ingroup threatening identity.自我刻板印象:群体威胁身份的核心作用。
J Soc Psychol. 2012 Jan-Feb;152(1):92-111. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2011.565382.
7
Influence of warmth and competence on the promotion of safe in-group selection: Stereotype content model and social categorization of faces.温暖与能力对促进安全的内群体选择的影响:刻板印象内容模型与面孔的社会分类
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2016;69(8):1464-79. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2015.1084339. Epub 2015 Oct 27.
8
The development of stereotype content: The use of warmth and competence in assessing social groups.刻板印象内容的发展:在评估社会群体时对热情和能力的运用。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2016 Jan;141:133-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2015.08.009. Epub 2015 Sep 26.
9
Warmth Trumps Competence in Evaluations of Both Ingroup and Outgroup.在对内群体和外群体的评价中,温暖胜过能力。
Int J Sci Commer Humanit. 2013 Sep;1(6):99-105.
10
On the immediate consequences of intergroup categorization: activation of approach and avoidance motor behavior toward ingroup and outgroup members.关于群体间分类的直接后果:对 ingroup 和 outgroup 成员的趋近与回避运动行为的激活。 (注:这里“ingroup”和“outgroup”在心理学等领域常分别译为“内群体”和“外群体” ,但原文未翻译这两个词直接保留英文表述,按要求应如此处理)
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2008 Jun;34(6):755-68. doi: 10.1177/0146167208315155. Epub 2008 Apr 3.

引用本文的文献

1
A systematic literature review of the stereotype content model in the fields of psychology and marketing: main themes examined in the literature and an agenda for future research in marketing.心理学与营销领域中刻板印象内容模型的系统文献综述:文献中探讨的主要主题及营销领域未来研究议程
Front Psychol. 2024 May 20;15:1392629. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1392629. eCollection 2024.
2
Forecasting the Primary Dimension of Social Perception: Symbolic and Realistic Threats Together Predict Warmth in the Stereotype Content Model.预测社会认知的主要维度:在刻板印象内容模型中,象征性和现实性威胁共同预测热情程度。
Soc Psychol (Gott). 2015;46(1):36-45. doi: 10.1027/1864-9335/a000219. Epub 2015 Jan 9.
3
Warmth and competence predict overoptimistic beliefs for out-group but not in-group members.
温暖和能力预测对外群体成员的过度乐观信念,但不预测内群体成员的过度乐观信念。
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 26;13(11):e0207670. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207670. eCollection 2018.
4
To Strike a Pose: No Stereotype Backlash for Power Posing Women.摆出姿势:摆姿势的女性不会受到刻板印象的反冲。
Front Psychol. 2016 Sep 27;7:1463. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01463. eCollection 2016.
5
Intergroup Biases: A Focus on Stereotype Content.群体间偏见:对刻板印象内容的关注。
Curr Opin Behav Sci. 2015 Jun;3:45-50. doi: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2015.01.010.