Suppr超能文献

产妇对剖宫产的偏好:女性能否如愿以偿?

Maternal preference for cesarean delivery: do women get what they want?

机构信息

Department of Health Management and Health Economics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Aug;120(2 Pt 1):252-60. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182605b1a.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the association between delivery preferences during pregnancy and actual delivery mode.

METHODS

This was a prospective cohort study using data from the Norwegian Mother and Child Cohort Study (N=65,959). We analyzed predictors of birth outcome by means of women's preferences for mode or delivery and a range of medical and socioeconomic factors with multivariable logistic regression models. The term "elective" cesarean delivery includes cesarean deliveries planned 8 hours or more before delivery and performed as planned.

RESULTS

When asked about delivery preference at 30 weeks of gestation, 5% of the women reported a preference for a cesarean delivery, 84% had a preference for vaginal delivery, and 11% were neutral. Among those with a cesarean delivery preference, 48% subsequently had a cesarean delivery (12% acute and 36% elective), and of those with a vaginal preference 12% delivered by cesarean (8.7% acute and 3.1% elective). When adjusting for maternal characteristics and medical indications, the odds for an acute cesarean delivery among nulliparous women with a cesarean delivery preference was almost two times higher (odds ratio [OR] 1.97, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.49-2.62) and for elective cesarean delivery the preference was 12 times higher (OR 12.61, 95% CI 9.69-16.42) than for women with a vaginal preference. For multiparous women, the corresponding figures were OR 3.13 (95% CI 1.39-7.05) and OR 10.04 (95% CI 4.59-21.99). When multiparous women with previous cesarean deliveries were excluded, the OR for an elective cesarean delivery was 26 times higher given a cesarean delivery preference compared with a vaginal delivery preference (OR 25.78, 95% CI 7.89-84.28). Based on a small subset of women with planned cesarean delivery on maternal request (n=560), we estimated a predicted probability of 16% for nulliparous women (25% for multiparous women) for such cesarean delivery.

CONCLUSION

Pregnant women's expressed preferences for delivery mode were associated with both elective and acute cesarean deliveries.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

摘要

目的

评估孕期分娩偏好与实际分娩方式之间的关联。

方法

这是一项使用挪威母亲和儿童队列研究(N=65959)数据的前瞻性队列研究。我们通过多变量逻辑回归模型,分析了分娩结局的预测因素,包括女性对分娩方式的偏好以及一系列医疗和社会经济因素。“选择性”剖宫产包括计划在分娩前 8 小时或更早进行的剖宫产,且按计划进行。

结果

在 30 周妊娠时询问分娩偏好时,5%的女性表示偏好剖宫产,84%的女性偏好阴道分娩,11%的女性表示中立。在有剖宫产偏好的女性中,48%最终行剖宫产(12%为急症,36%为选择性),而有阴道分娩偏好的女性中有 12%行剖宫产(8.7%为急症,3.1%为选择性)。调整产妇特征和医学指征后,初产妇有剖宫产偏好时行急症剖宫产的几率几乎增加两倍(优势比[OR]1.97,95%置信区间[CI]1.49-2.62),而选择性剖宫产的偏好则增加 12 倍(OR 12.61,95%CI 9.69-16.42),高于有阴道分娩偏好的女性。对于经产妇,相应的数字分别为 OR 3.13(95%CI 1.39-7.05)和 OR 10.04(95%CI 4.59-21.99)。排除有既往剖宫产史的经产妇后,与阴道分娩偏好相比,剖宫产偏好行选择性剖宫产的几率高 26 倍(OR 25.78,95%CI 7.89-84.28)。根据有计划的基于产妇要求的剖宫产(n=560)的一小部分女性,我们估计初产妇这种剖宫产的预测概率为 16%(经产妇为 25%)。

结论

孕妇对分娩方式的表达偏好与选择性和急症剖宫产均有关。

证据水平

II。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验