Department of Health Management and Health Economics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Aug;120(2 Pt 1):252-60. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182605b1a.
To estimate the association between delivery preferences during pregnancy and actual delivery mode.
This was a prospective cohort study using data from the Norwegian Mother and Child Cohort Study (N=65,959). We analyzed predictors of birth outcome by means of women's preferences for mode or delivery and a range of medical and socioeconomic factors with multivariable logistic regression models. The term "elective" cesarean delivery includes cesarean deliveries planned 8 hours or more before delivery and performed as planned.
When asked about delivery preference at 30 weeks of gestation, 5% of the women reported a preference for a cesarean delivery, 84% had a preference for vaginal delivery, and 11% were neutral. Among those with a cesarean delivery preference, 48% subsequently had a cesarean delivery (12% acute and 36% elective), and of those with a vaginal preference 12% delivered by cesarean (8.7% acute and 3.1% elective). When adjusting for maternal characteristics and medical indications, the odds for an acute cesarean delivery among nulliparous women with a cesarean delivery preference was almost two times higher (odds ratio [OR] 1.97, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.49-2.62) and for elective cesarean delivery the preference was 12 times higher (OR 12.61, 95% CI 9.69-16.42) than for women with a vaginal preference. For multiparous women, the corresponding figures were OR 3.13 (95% CI 1.39-7.05) and OR 10.04 (95% CI 4.59-21.99). When multiparous women with previous cesarean deliveries were excluded, the OR for an elective cesarean delivery was 26 times higher given a cesarean delivery preference compared with a vaginal delivery preference (OR 25.78, 95% CI 7.89-84.28). Based on a small subset of women with planned cesarean delivery on maternal request (n=560), we estimated a predicted probability of 16% for nulliparous women (25% for multiparous women) for such cesarean delivery.
Pregnant women's expressed preferences for delivery mode were associated with both elective and acute cesarean deliveries.
II.
评估孕期分娩偏好与实际分娩方式之间的关联。
这是一项使用挪威母亲和儿童队列研究(N=65959)数据的前瞻性队列研究。我们通过多变量逻辑回归模型,分析了分娩结局的预测因素,包括女性对分娩方式的偏好以及一系列医疗和社会经济因素。“选择性”剖宫产包括计划在分娩前 8 小时或更早进行的剖宫产,且按计划进行。
在 30 周妊娠时询问分娩偏好时,5%的女性表示偏好剖宫产,84%的女性偏好阴道分娩,11%的女性表示中立。在有剖宫产偏好的女性中,48%最终行剖宫产(12%为急症,36%为选择性),而有阴道分娩偏好的女性中有 12%行剖宫产(8.7%为急症,3.1%为选择性)。调整产妇特征和医学指征后,初产妇有剖宫产偏好时行急症剖宫产的几率几乎增加两倍(优势比[OR]1.97,95%置信区间[CI]1.49-2.62),而选择性剖宫产的偏好则增加 12 倍(OR 12.61,95%CI 9.69-16.42),高于有阴道分娩偏好的女性。对于经产妇,相应的数字分别为 OR 3.13(95%CI 1.39-7.05)和 OR 10.04(95%CI 4.59-21.99)。排除有既往剖宫产史的经产妇后,与阴道分娩偏好相比,剖宫产偏好行选择性剖宫产的几率高 26 倍(OR 25.78,95%CI 7.89-84.28)。根据有计划的基于产妇要求的剖宫产(n=560)的一小部分女性,我们估计初产妇这种剖宫产的预测概率为 16%(经产妇为 25%)。
孕妇对分娩方式的表达偏好与选择性和急症剖宫产均有关。
II。