Suppr超能文献

性别与性别的陷阱和跳板:医学与健康科学领域性别研究人员的焦点小组研究

Sex and gender traps and springboards: a focus group study among gender researchers in medicine and health sciences.

作者信息

Christianson Monica, Alex Lena, Wiklund Anncristine Fjellman, Hammarström Anne, Lundman Berit

机构信息

Department of Nursing, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.

出版信息

Health Care Women Int. 2012;33(8):739-55. doi: 10.1080/07399332.2011.645970.

Abstract

We explored the difficulties that gender researchers encounter in their research and the strategies they use for solving these problems. Sixteen Swedish researchers, all women, took part in focus group discussions; the data were analyzed using qualitative content analysis. The problems reported fell into four main categories: the ambiguity of the concepts of sex and gender; traps associated with dichotomization; difficulties with communication; and issues around publication. Categories of suggested problem-solving strategies were adaptation, pragmatism, addressing the complexities, and definition of terms. Here the specific views of gender researchers in medicine and health sciences-"medical insiders"-bring new challenges into focus.

摘要

我们探讨了性别研究人员在其研究中遇到的困难以及他们用于解决这些问题的策略。16位瑞典研究人员(均为女性)参与了焦点小组讨论;使用定性内容分析法对数据进行了分析。报告的问题主要分为四类:性与性别的概念模糊;与二分法相关的陷阱;沟通困难;以及出版方面的问题。建议的解决问题策略类别包括调整、实用主义、应对复杂性以及术语定义。在此,医学和健康科学领域的性别研究人员——“医学内部人士”的具体观点使新的挑战成为焦点。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验