LSE Health London School of Economics, Houghton Street London WC2A, UK.
Health Econ Rev. 2011 Nov 21;1(1):18. doi: 10.1186/2191-1991-1-18.
This study provides an overview of policy measures targeting pharmaceutical expenditure in Europe and analyses their impact on originator pharmaceutical prices. Panel data methods are used to examine the market of ACE Inhibitors in six European countries (Denmark, France, Germany, Netherlands, Sweden, United Kingdom) over period 1991-2006. We find that although some measures are effective in reducing originator prices, others appear to have an insignificant effect. Results suggest that supply side measures such as mandatory generic substitution, regressive pharmacy mark-ups and claw-backs are effective in reducing pharmaceuticals prices. Results are not as strong for demand side measures. Profit controls and the use of cost-effectiveness analysis appear to have a negative effect on prices, while results on reference pricing are inconclusive. Findings also indicate that, although originator prices are not immediately affected by generic entry, they may be influenced by changes in generic prices post patent expiry.
本研究概述了欧洲针对药品支出的政策措施,并分析了这些措施对原研药价格的影响。本研究使用面板数据方法,考察了 1991 年至 2006 年间六个欧洲国家(丹麦、法国、德国、荷兰、瑞典和英国)的 ACE 抑制剂市场。我们发现,尽管一些措施在降低原研药价格方面是有效的,但其他措施似乎没有显著效果。结果表明,供应方措施,如强制性仿制药替代、递减式药房加成和回扣,在降低药品价格方面是有效的。在需求方措施方面,结果则不那么明显。利润控制和成本效益分析的使用似乎对价格产生了负面影响,而参考定价的结果则尚无定论。研究结果还表明,尽管原研药价格不会立即受到仿制药进入市场的影响,但在专利过期后,仿制药价格的变化可能会对原研药价格产生影响。