Archambault Patrick M, Blouin Danielle, Poitras Julien, Fountain Renée-Marie, Fleet Richard, Bilodeau Andrea, Légaré France
Centre de santé et de services sociaux Alphonse-Desjardins, Lévis, Canada.
Inform Prim Care. 2011;19(4):207-16. doi: 10.14236/jhi.v19i4.815.
Web 2.0 collaborative writing technologies have shown positive effects on medical education. One such technology, Google Docs(™), offers collaborative writing applications that improve healthcare students' sharing of information. Since 2008, all graduating residents in emergency medicine in Canada have had access to an online Google Docs(™) slideshow designed to help them share summaries of landmark articles in preparation for their Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada certification exam. A recent evaluation showed that contributions to the presentation were low.
This study will identify the factors that influence residents' decision to contribute or not to contribute to this online collaborative project.
Using the Theory of Planned Behaviour, semistructured interviews will be conducted with 25 graduating emergency medicine residents in Canada. Content from the interviews will be analysed to determine the most important beliefs in relation to the defined behaviour.
To our knowledge, this study will be the first to use a theory based framework to identify healthcare trainees' salient beliefs concerning their decision whether to contribute to an online collaborative writing project using Google Docs(™).
网络2.0协作写作技术已在医学教育中显示出积极效果。谷歌文档(™)就是这样一种技术,它提供协作写作应用程序,可改善医学生的信息共享。自2008年以来,加拿大所有即将毕业的急诊医学住院医师都可以使用一个在线谷歌文档(™)幻灯片演示文稿,该文稿旨在帮助他们分享具有里程碑意义的文章摘要,为加拿大皇家内科医师和外科医师学院认证考试做准备。最近的一项评估显示,对该演示文稿的贡献度较低。
本研究将确定影响住院医师决定是否参与这个在线协作项目的因素。
运用计划行为理论,对加拿大25名即将毕业的急诊医学住院医师进行半结构化访谈。将对访谈内容进行分析,以确定与既定行为相关的最重要信念。
据我们所知,本研究将首次使用基于理论的框架来确定医学生对于是否参与使用谷歌文档(™)的在线协作写作项目的显著信念。