Zheng Y P
Research Institute of Mental Health, Hunan Medical University, Changsha.
Zhonghua Shen Jing Jing Shen Ke Za Zhi. 1990 Oct;23(5):275-9, 318-9.
This paper describes the development of Depression Inventory (DI), its reliability, validity, and distributional value of DI score, using a sample of 329 currently depressed patients from 24 hospitals. Comparing to Hamilton Depression Scale (HDS), the correlation efficient between Hamilton Depression Scale and DI, and Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) is 0.608 and 0.536, respectively. The validity of DI is better than BDI. Item contents of DI are understood and rated easily for depressive patients. Four factors are derived from DI, those are alarm, agitation, somatic symptoms, and depression/retardation. Factor construction and items of DI are reasonable, and reflect the clinical features of depression, especially the alarm factor provides a parametric index for prevention and prediction of suicide.
本文描述了抑郁量表（DI）的编制过程、信度、效度以及DI得分的分布情况，研究样本来自24家医院的329名当前患有抑郁症的患者。与汉密尔顿抑郁量表（HDS）相比，汉密尔顿抑郁量表与DI以及贝克抑郁量表（BDI）之间的相关系数分别为0.608和0.536。DI的效度优于BDI。抑郁患者对DI的项目内容易于理解和评分。DI可归纳为四个因子，即警觉、激越、躯体症状以及抑郁/迟缓。DI的因子结构和项目合理，反映了抑郁症的临床特征，尤其是警觉因子为自杀的预防和预测提供了一个参数指标。
