Section of Forensic Chemistry, Department of Forensic Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Clin Chem. 2012 Sep;58(9):1292-301. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2012.182543. Epub 2012 Jul 24.
In recent years, increasing focus has been directed to the methodology for evaluating (new) tests or biomarkers. A key step in the evaluation of a diagnostic test is the investigation into its accuracy.
We reviewed the literature on how to assess the accuracy of diagnostic tests. Accuracy refers to the amount of agreement between the results of the test under evaluation (index test) and the results of a reference standard or test. The generally recommended approach is to use a prospective cohort design in patients who are suspected of having the disease of interest, in which each individual undergoes the index and same reference standard tests. This approach presents several challenges, including the problems that can arise with the verification of the index test results by the preferred reference standard test, the choice of cutoff value in case of a continuous index test result, and the determination of how to translate accuracy results to recommendations for clinical use. This first in a series of 4 reports presents an overview of the designs of single-test accuracy studies and the concepts of specificity, sensitivity, posterior probabilities (i.e., predictive values) for the presence of target disease, ROC curves, and likelihood ratios, all illustrated with empirical data from a study on the diagnosis of suspected deep venous thrombosis. Limitations of the concept of the diagnostic accuracy for a single test are also highlighted.
The prospective cohort design in patients suspected of having the disease of interest is the optimal approach to estimate the accuracy of a diagnostic test. However, the accuracy of a diagnostic index test is not constant but varies across different clinical contexts, disease spectrums, and even patient subgroups.
近年来,人们越来越关注评估(新)测试或生物标志物的方法学。诊断测试评估的关键步骤是调查其准确性。
我们回顾了评估诊断测试准确性的文献。准确性是指评估测试(指标测试)结果与参考标准或测试结果之间的一致性程度。通常推荐的方法是在疑似患有目标疾病的患者中使用前瞻性队列设计,其中每个个体都接受指标和相同的参考标准测试。这种方法提出了几个挑战,包括通过首选参考标准测试验证指标测试结果可能出现的问题、连续指标测试结果的截止值选择以及如何将准确性结果转化为临床应用建议的问题。这是一系列 4 份报告中的第一份,概述了单测试准确性研究的设计以及特异性、敏感性、针对目标疾病存在的后验概率(即预测值)、ROC 曲线和似然比的概念,所有这些都通过疑似深静脉血栓形成诊断研究中的经验数据进行了说明。还强调了单一测试诊断准确性概念的局限性。
在疑似患有目标疾病的患者中使用前瞻性队列设计是估计诊断测试准确性的最佳方法。然而,诊断指标测试的准确性不是固定的,而是因不同的临床情况、疾病谱甚至患者亚组而异。