• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

SHOX-2甲基化检测对恶性胸腔积液的诊断准确性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析

Diagnostic accuracy of SHOX-2 methylation for malignant pleural effusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Wang Hao-Jie, Cui Jian-Ying, Hou Wen-Jie, Hao Xu-Lei, Zheng Wen-Qi, Hu Zhi-De, Cao Xi-Shan, Yan Li

机构信息

Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, the Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot, China.

Key Laboratory for Biomarkers, Inner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot, China.

出版信息

Transl Cancer Res. 2025 Aug 31;14(8):4955-4964. doi: 10.21037/tcr-2025-686. Epub 2025 Aug 19.

DOI:10.21037/tcr-2025-686
PMID:40950690
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12432786/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Some studies have assessed the diagnostic value of SHOX-2 methylation for malignant pleural effusion (MPE), but their findings were inconsistent. This study aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of SHOX-2 methylation for MPE.

METHODS

We searched the PubMed and Web of Science databases to identify studies involving SHOX-2 methylation in diagnosing MPE. The last search date was in December 2024. We evaluated the quality of the included studies using the revised Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool-2 (QUADAS-2). A bivariate model was used to pool the sensitivity, specificity, and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of SHOX-2 methylation. The overall diagnostic accuracy of SHOX-2 methylation was assessed by a summary receiver operating characteristic (sROC) curve. The publication bias was analyzed using Deek's test.

RESULTS

Six studies with 613 MPE patients and 723 benign pleural effusion (BPE) patients were included. The pooled sensitivity (95% CI) and specificity (95% CI) of SHOX-2 methylation were 0.64 (0.36-0.85) and 0.96 (0.92-0.98), respectively. The area under the sROC curve was 0.96 (95% CI: 0.94-0.97). There was no publication bias across the eligible studies.

CONCLUSIONS

SHOX-2 methylation has a moderate diagnostic value for MPE.

摘要

背景

一些研究评估了SHOX-2甲基化对恶性胸腔积液(MPE)的诊断价值,但其结果并不一致。本研究旨在进行系统评价和荟萃分析,以评估SHOX-2甲基化对MPE的诊断准确性。

方法

我们检索了PubMed和Web of Science数据库,以识别涉及SHOX-2甲基化诊断MPE的研究。最后一次检索日期为2024年12月。我们使用修订后的诊断准确性研究质量评估工具-2(QUADAS-2)评估纳入研究的质量。采用双变量模型汇总SHOX-2甲基化的敏感性、特异性及其95%置信区间(CI)。通过汇总受试者工作特征(sROC)曲线评估SHOX-2甲基化的总体诊断准确性。使用Deek检验分析发表偏倚。

结果

纳入了6项研究,共613例MPE患者和723例良性胸腔积液(BPE)患者。SHOX-2甲基化的合并敏感性(95%CI)和特异性(95%CI)分别为0.64(0.36-0.85)和0.96(0.92-0.98)。sROC曲线下面积为0.96(95%CI:0.94-0.97)。在符合条件的研究中没有发表偏倚。

结论

SHOX-2甲基化对MPE具有中等诊断价值。

相似文献

1
Diagnostic accuracy of SHOX-2 methylation for malignant pleural effusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.SHOX-2甲基化检测对恶性胸腔积液的诊断准确性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Transl Cancer Res. 2025 Aug 31;14(8):4955-4964. doi: 10.21037/tcr-2025-686. Epub 2025 Aug 19.
2
Pleural fluid human epididymis secretory protein 4 in differentiating between malignant and benign pleural effusions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.胸腔积液中人附睾分泌蛋白4在鉴别恶性和良性胸腔积液中的应用:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
J Thorac Dis. 2025 Aug 31;17(8):5951-5959. doi: 10.21037/jtd-2025-342. Epub 2025 Aug 28.
3
PET-CT for assessing mediastinal lymph node involvement in patients with suspected resectable non-small cell lung cancer.正电子发射断层显像-计算机断层扫描用于评估疑似可切除非小细胞肺癌患者的纵隔淋巴结受累情况。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Nov 13;2014(11):CD009519. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009519.pub2.
4
Plasma and cerebrospinal fluid amyloid beta for the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease dementia and other dementias in people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI).血浆和脑脊液β淀粉样蛋白用于诊断轻度认知障碍(MCI)患者的阿尔茨海默病性痴呆及其他痴呆。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jun 10;2014(6):CD008782. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008782.pub4.
5
Interventions for the management of malignant pleural effusions: a network meta-analysis.恶性胸腔积液管理的干预措施:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 May 8;2016(5):CD010529. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010529.pub2.
6
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
7
Non-invasive diagnostic tests for Helicobacter pylori infection.幽门螺杆菌感染的非侵入性诊断测试。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Mar 15;3(3):CD012080. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012080.pub2.
8
Are Artificial Intelligence Models Reliable for Clinical Application in Pediatric Fracture Detection on Radiographs? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.人工智能模型在儿科骨折X线片检测中的临床应用是否可靠?一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Aug 20. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003660.
9
Three-dimensional saline infusion sonography compared to two-dimensional saline infusion sonography for the diagnosis of focal intracavitary lesions.三维盐水灌注超声与二维盐水灌注超声在诊断腔内局灶性病变中的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 May 5;5(5):CD011126. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011126.pub2.
10
Amplitude-integrated electroencephalography compared with conventional video-electroencephalography for detection of neonatal seizures.振幅整合脑电图与传统视频脑电图在新生儿惊厥检测中的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Aug 11;8(8):CD013546. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013546.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
A comparative diagnostic yield among cytologic examination, cell block and closed pleural biopsy in exudative pleural effusion.渗出性胸腔积液中细胞学检查、细胞块和闭式胸膜活检的诊断率比较
J Thorac Dis. 2024 Oct 31;16(10):6770-6777. doi: 10.21037/jtd-24-1006. Epub 2024 Oct 30.
2
Tumor markers determination in malignant pleural effusion: pearls and pitfalls.恶性胸腔积液中肿瘤标志物的测定:要点与陷阱
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2024 Aug 16;63(3):515-520. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2024-0542. Print 2025 Feb 25.
3
Pleural fluid biomarkers: a narrative review.
胸腔积液生物标志物:一篇综述
J Thorac Dis. 2024 Jul 30;16(7):4764-4771. doi: 10.21037/jtd-24-467. Epub 2024 Jul 18.
4
Diagnostic value and safety of medical thoracoscopy in undiagnosed pleural effusions-a prospective observational cohort study.内科胸腔镜检查在不明原因胸腔积液中的诊断价值及安全性——一项前瞻性观察队列研究
J Thorac Dis. 2024 May 31;16(5):3142-3151. doi: 10.21037/jtd-24-219. Epub 2024 May 22.
5
Performance of SHOX2 and RASSF1A methylation assay in supernatants and matched cell pellets for the diagnosis of malignant pleural effusion.SHOX2和RASSF1A甲基化检测在恶性胸腔积液诊断中超滤液和匹配细胞沉淀中的性能
Clin Chim Acta. 2024 Jan 15;553:117699. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2023.117699. Epub 2023 Dec 10.
6
Combined Methylation of and Genes in Diagnosing Malignant Pleural Effusion.联合 和 基因甲基化用于诊断恶性胸腔积液
Discov Med. 2023 Oct;35(178):845-852. doi: 10.24976/Discov.Med.202335178.79.
7
DNA Methylation Analysis of the and Panel Using Cell-Free DNA in the Diagnosis of Malignant Pleural Effusion.利用游离DNA对恶性胸腔积液诊断中[具体内容缺失]和[具体内容缺失]面板进行DNA甲基化分析。
J Oncol. 2023 Jan 14;2023:5888844. doi: 10.1155/2023/5888844. eCollection 2023.
8
Pleural fluid biochemical analysis: the past, present and future.胸腔液生化分析:过去、现在和未来。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2022 Nov 17;61(5):921-934. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2022-0844. Print 2023 Apr 25.
9
Diagnosis and Treatment of Pleural Effusion. Recommendations of the Spanish Society of Pulmonology and Thoracic Surgery. Update 2022.胸腔积液的诊断和治疗。西班牙肺病学和胸外科学会的建议。2022 年更新。
Arch Bronconeumol. 2023 Jan;59(1):27-35. doi: 10.1016/j.arbres.2022.09.017. Epub 2022 Sep 30.
10
A detection panel of novel methylated DNA markers for malignant pleural effusion.一种用于恶性胸腔积液的新型甲基化DNA标志物检测面板。
Front Oncol. 2022 Sep 13;12:967079. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.967079. eCollection 2022.