Suppr超能文献

信息风险、机构审查以及《通用规则》拟议修订中的自主性

Informational risk, institutional review, and autonomy in the proposed changes to the common rule.

作者信息

Allyse Megan, Karkazis Katrina, Lee Sandra Soo-Jin, Tobin Sara L, Greely Henry T, Cho Mildred K, Magnus David

机构信息

Stanford Center for the Integration of Research on Genetics and Ethics, Stanford University, CA, USA.

出版信息

IRB. 2012 May-Jun;34(3):17-9.

Abstract

In 2011, the Department of Health and Human Services proposed changes to the regulations which govern human subjects protection in Federally funded research. The proposed changes involve modifying inclusion standards for minimal risk research and removing the necessity of review from certain categories of non-invasive research. All studies would instead be required to comply with privacy protections as initiated by the Health Information Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA). We argue that relying on HIPAA to protect participants from participation-related risks in non-invasive research is insufficient to protect the autonomy and psychological health of potential research participants. Instead, we suggest a streamlined review format for these categories of research.

摘要

2011年,美国卫生与公众服务部提议对联邦资助研究中保护人类受试者的法规进行修改。提议的修改包括调整最低风险研究的纳入标准,以及免除某些非侵入性研究类别的审查必要性。相反,所有研究都将被要求遵守《健康保险流通与责任法案》(HIPAA)所启动的隐私保护规定。我们认为,依靠HIPAA来保护非侵入性研究中参与者免受与参与相关的风险,不足以保护潜在研究参与者的自主性和心理健康。相反,我们建议对这些研究类别采用简化的审查形式。

相似文献

6
Privacy in genetics research.遗传学研究中的隐私问题。
Science. 1999 Aug 27;285(5432):1359-61. doi: 10.1126/science.285.5432.1359.

本文引用的文献

3
Broadening consent--and diluting ethics?扩大同意范围——以及稀释伦理准则?
J Med Ethics. 2009 Feb;35(2):125-9. doi: 10.1136/jme.2008.024851.
6
Tearoom trade: means and ends in social research.
Stud Hastings Cent. 1973 Apr;1(1):27-38.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验