• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

电梯间交流:公共场所不当言论的观察性研究

Elevator talk: observational study of inappropriate comments in a public space.

作者信息

Ubel P A, Zell M M, Miller D J, Fischer G S, Peters-Stefani D, Arnold R M

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA.

出版信息

Am J Med. 1995 Aug;99(2):190-4. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(99)80139-9.

DOI:10.1016/s0002-9343(99)80139-9
PMID:7625424
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

We conducted a study to determine the type and frequency of inappropriate comments made by hospital employees while riding hospital elevators.

METHODS

Four observers rode in elevators at five hospitals, listening for any comments made by hospital employees that might be deemed inappropriate. All potentially inappropriate comments were reviewed by the research team and were classified as inappropriate if they met at least one of the following criteria: violated patient confidentiality, raised concerns about the speaker's ability or desire to provide high-quality patient care, raised concerns about poor quality of care in the hospital (by persons other than the speaker), or contained derogatory remarks about patients or their families.

RESULTS

We observed 259 one-way elevator trips offering opportunity for conversation. We overheard a total of 39 inappropriate comments, which took place on 36 rides (13.9% of the trips). The most frequent comments (18) were violations of patients confidentiality. Next most frequent (10 comments) were unprofessional remarks in which clinicians talked about themselves in ways that raised questions about their ability or desire to provide high-quality patient care. Other comments included derogatory statements about the general quality of hospital care (8) and derogatory remarks about patients (5). Physicians were involved in 15 of the comments, nurses in 10, and other hospital employees in the remainder.

CONCLUSION

Inappropriate comments took place with disturbing frequency in the elevator rides we sampled. These comments did not exclusively involve violations of patient confidentiality, but encompassed a range of discussions that health care employees must be careful to avoid.

摘要

目的

我们开展了一项研究,以确定医院员工在乘坐医院电梯时发表的不当言论的类型和频率。

方法

四名观察者在五家医院乘坐电梯,倾听医院员工可能被视为不当的任何言论。研究团队对所有可能不当的言论进行了审查,如果符合以下至少一项标准,则被归类为不当言论:违反患者保密规定、引发对发言者提供高质量患者护理的能力或意愿的担忧、引发对医院护理质量差的担忧(发言者以外的人)或包含对患者或其家属的贬损言论。

结果

我们观察到259次单向电梯行程,提供了交谈机会。我们总共无意中听到39条不当言论,发生在36次行程中(占行程的13.9%)。最常见的言论(18条)是违反患者保密规定。其次最常见的(10条言论)是不专业的言论,临床医生以引发对其提供高质量患者护理的能力或意愿的质疑的方式谈论自己。其他言论包括对医院护理总体质量的贬损性陈述(8条)和对患者的贬损言论(5条)。医生参与了15条言论,护士参与了10条,其余由其他医院员工参与。

结论

在我们抽样的电梯行程中,不当言论出现的频率令人不安。这些言论并不只涉及违反患者保密规定,而是涵盖了一系列医护人员必须小心避免的讨论。

相似文献

1
Elevator talk: observational study of inappropriate comments in a public space.电梯间交流:公共场所不当言论的观察性研究
Am J Med. 1995 Aug;99(2):190-4. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(99)80139-9.
2
[What do people talk about in Danish hospital elevators?].
Ugeskr Laeger. 1997 Nov 10;159(46):6819-21.
3
Re Inquiry into the Confidentiality of Health Records in Ontario.关于安大略省健康记录保密性的再调查。
Dom Law Rep. 1978 Jun 30;90:576-85.
4
Confidentiality and privacy breaches in a university hospital emergency department.大学医院急诊科的保密和隐私侵犯问题。
Acad Emerg Med. 1997 Dec;4(12):1142-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.1997.tb03697.x.
5
Privacy of patients' information in hospital lifts: observational study.医院电梯中患者信息的隐私性:观察性研究
BMJ. 2003 Nov 1;327(7422):1024-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7422.1024.
6
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
7
Responsiveness to the hospital patient needs in Poland.波兰医院对患者需求的响应能力。
Rocz Panstw Zakl Hig. 2014;65(2):155-64.
8
Confidentiality breaches in clinical practice: what happens in hospitals?临床实践中的保密性违规行为:医院里发生了什么?
BMC Med Ethics. 2016 Sep 2;17(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s12910-016-0136-y.
9
[Use of stairs in a hospital increased by a sign near the stairs or the elevator].通过楼梯或电梯附近的标识,医院楼梯的使用率有所提高。
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2005 Dec 24;149(52):2900-3.
10
Professional ethics of psychologists and physicians: morality, confidentiality, and sexuality in Israel.以色列心理学家和医生的职业道德:道德、保密与性行为
Ethics Behav. 1996;6(3):213-38. doi: 10.1207/s15327019eb0603_4.

引用本文的文献

1
Keeping medical information safe and confidential: a qualitative study on perceptions of Israeli physicians.确保医疗信息安全和保密:一项关于以色列医生看法的定性研究。
Isr J Health Policy Res. 2024 Sep 27;13(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s13584-024-00641-9.
2
The Impact of Health Professionals' Language on Patient Experience: A Case Study.医疗专业人员的语言对患者体验的影响:一项案例研究。
J Patient Exp. 2022 Apr 7;9:23743735221092572. doi: 10.1177/23743735221092572. eCollection 2022.
3
Knowledge, practices, and patterns of data confidentiality among pharmacists in a developing country.
发展中国家药剂师的数据保密知识、实践与模式
Heliyon. 2022 Mar 15;8(3):e09115. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09115. eCollection 2022 Mar.
4
Physicians' Knowledge, Perceptions, and Attitudes Related to Patient Confidentiality and Data Sharing.医生关于患者保密和数据共享的知识、认知及态度。
Int J Gen Med. 2021 Mar 2;14:721-731. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S301800. eCollection 2021.
5
Assessment of Doctors' Knowledge and Attitudes Towards Confidentiality in Hospital Care.评估医生在医院护理中对保密性的知识和态度。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2019 Oct;25(5):1531-1548. doi: 10.1007/s11948-018-0078-5. Epub 2019 Jan 2.
6
Confidentiality breaches in clinical practice: what happens in hospitals?临床实践中的保密性违规行为:医院里发生了什么?
BMC Med Ethics. 2016 Sep 2;17(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s12910-016-0136-y.
7
[A guide to successful public relations for hospitals and emergency medical services].[医院及紧急医疗服务机构成功公共关系指南]
Anaesthesist. 2014 Apr;63(4):338-46. doi: 10.1007/s00101-014-2296-9.
8
Informational risk, institutional review, and autonomy in the proposed changes to the common rule.信息风险、机构审查以及《通用规则》拟议修订中的自主性
IRB. 2012 May-Jun;34(3):17-9.
9
Violations of medical confidentiality: opinions of primary care physicians.违反医疗保密规定:初级保健医生的观点。
Br J Gen Pract. 2009 Oct;59(567):e344-52. doi: 10.3399/bjgp09X472647.
10
Content of weblogs written by health professionals.健康专业人员撰写的网络日志内容。
J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Oct;23(10):1642-6. doi: 10.1007/s11606-008-0726-6. Epub 2008 Jul 23.