• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

巴西和印度的产前护理使用情况:规模、服务范围和社会经济不平等。

Antenatal care use in Brazil and India: scale, outreach and socioeconomic inequality.

机构信息

Centro de Desenvolvimento e Planejamento Regional de Minas Gerais, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Avenida Antonio Carlos, 6627 FACE-UFMG, Belo Horizonte, MG 31270-901, Brazil.

出版信息

Health Place. 2012 Sep;18(5):942-50. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2012.06.014. Epub 2012 Jul 7.

DOI:10.1016/j.healthplace.2012.06.014
PMID:22832334
Abstract

This paper investigates the extent of socioeconomic inequalities in antenatal care use and related medical procedures in Brazil and India, which represent transition economies with contrasting geographical and sociocultural composition and health care provision. Concentration indices and regression analyses applied on recent Demographic Health Survey data reveal high and proportionate distribution of antenatal coverage in Brazil, whereas the Indian case present problems of both scale and equity. Inequalities in access to four or more antenatal visits are significantly pronounced in India, and in Brazil the differences are significant only for those who had six or more visits. Brazil's universal healthcare model which proved effective in promoting equitable distribution of antenatal care could be implemented in India. Future interventions should emphasis quality of care in monitoring essential antenatal services especially targeting the poor and deprived communities.

摘要

本论文调查了巴西和印度在产前护理使用及相关医疗程序方面存在的社会经济不平等程度,这两个国家都属于过渡经济体,具有不同的地理和社会文化构成以及医疗保健服务提供情况。利用最近的人口健康调查数据进行的集中指数和回归分析表明,巴西的产前护理覆盖率较高且分布较为均衡,而印度则存在规模和公平性两方面的问题。在印度,获得四次或更多次产前检查的机会不平等现象非常明显,而在巴西,只有接受六次或更多次产前检查的人之间才存在显著差异。巴西的全民医疗保健模式在促进产前护理公平分配方面效果显著,可以在印度实施。未来的干预措施应重点关注基本产前服务的质量,特别是针对贫困和弱势群体的服务。

相似文献

1
Antenatal care use in Brazil and India: scale, outreach and socioeconomic inequality.巴西和印度的产前护理使用情况:规模、服务范围和社会经济不平等。
Health Place. 2012 Sep;18(5):942-50. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2012.06.014. Epub 2012 Jul 7.
2
Antenatal care: provision and inequality in rural north India.产前护理:印度北部农村地区的提供情况与不平等现象
Soc Sci Med. 2004 Sep;59(6):1147-58. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2003.11.045.
3
Equity in antenatal care quality: an analysis of 91 national household surveys.产前护理质量中的公平性:91 项国家家庭调查分析。
Lancet Glob Health. 2018 Nov;6(11):e1186-e1195. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30389-9.
4
Family health strategy and equity in prenatal care: a population based cross-sectional study in Minas Gerais, Brazil.家庭健康战略与产前保健公平性:巴西米纳斯吉拉斯州的一项基于人群的横断面研究。
Int J Equity Health. 2017 Jan 21;16(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s12939-016-0503-9.
5
Multiple deprivations and maternal care in India.印度的多重剥夺与母婴关怀。
Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2012 Mar;38(1):6-14. doi: 10.1363/3800612.
6
Antenatal care and morbidity profile of pregnant women in an urban resettlement colony of Delhi, India.印度德里一个城市安置区孕妇的产前护理与发病情况
East Afr J Public Health. 2011 Jun;8(2):157-60.
7
On the socio-economic determinants of antenatal care utilization in Azerbaijan: evidence and policy implications for reforms.阿塞拜疆产前护理利用的社会经济决定因素:改革的证据和政策含义。
Health Econ Policy Law. 2011 Apr;6(2):175-203. doi: 10.1017/S1744133110000174. Epub 2010 Jul 2.
8
How twins differ: multiple pregnancy and the use of health care in the 2008 Nigeria Demographic and Health Survey.双胞胎的差异:2008 年尼日利亚人口与健康调查中的多胎妊娠和医疗保健利用情况。
Trop Med Int Health. 2012 May;17(5):637-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2012.02967.x. Epub 2012 Apr 2.
9
Determinants of demand for antenatal care in Colombia.哥伦比亚产前护理需求的决定因素。
Health Policy. 2008 May;86(2-3):363-72. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2007.12.002. Epub 2008 Jan 16.
10
Utilization of maternal health care services among married adolescent women: insights from the Nigeria Demographic and Health Survey, 2008.已婚青少年女性利用妇幼保健服务的情况:来自 2008 年尼日利亚人口与健康调查的见解。
Womens Health Issues. 2012 Jul-Aug;22(4):e407-14. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2012.05.001.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors associated with underutilization of antenatal care in India: Results from 2019-2021 National Family Health Survey.印度产前护理利用不足的相关因素:2019-2021 年全国家庭健康调查结果。
PLoS One. 2023 May 8;18(5):e0285454. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285454. eCollection 2023.
2
High chlamydia infection and its associated factors among patients seeking clinic-based STI services in Southern China: A preliminary cross-sectional study.中国南方地区寻求基于诊所的性传播感染服务患者中高衣原体感染及其相关因素:一项初步的横断面研究。
Front Public Health. 2022 Nov 23;10:1005334. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1005334. eCollection 2022.
3
Decomposing socio-economic inequalities in antenatal care utilisation in 12 Southern African Development Community countries.
剖析南部非洲发展共同体12个国家产前护理利用方面的社会经济不平等现象。
SSM Popul Health. 2021 Dec 16;17:101004. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.101004. eCollection 2022 Mar.
4
Social determinants of maternal health: a scoping review of factors influencing maternal mortality and maternal health service use in India.孕产妇健康的社会决定因素:对影响印度孕产妇死亡率和孕产妇保健服务利用情况的因素进行的范围综述
Public Health Rev. 2020 Jun 2;41:13. doi: 10.1186/s40985-020-00125-6. eCollection 2020.
5
Oral problems and associated risk indicators in adults in the Russian Federation, India, and China.俄罗斯联邦、印度和中国成年人的口腔问题及相关风险指标。
BMC Oral Health. 2019 Jun 14;19(1):114. doi: 10.1186/s12903-019-0811-8.
6
Antenatal care and caesarean sections: trends and inequalities in four population-based birth cohorts in Pelotas, Brazil, 1982-2015.产前保健和剖宫产术:1982-2015 年巴西佩洛塔斯四个基于人群的出生队列的趋势和不平等。
Int J Epidemiol. 2019 Apr 1;48(Suppl 1):i37-i45. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyy211.
7
Progress and inequalities in infant and young child feeding practices in India between 2006 and 2016.2006 年至 2016 年期间印度婴幼儿喂养实践的进展和不平等。
Matern Child Nutr. 2018 Nov;14 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):e12663. doi: 10.1111/mcn.12663.
8
Heterogeneities in utilization of antenatal care in Uttar Pradesh, India: the need to contextualize interventions to individual contexts.印度北方邦产前护理利用情况的异质性:根据个体情况对干预措施进行情境化处理的必要性。
Glob Health Action. 2018;11(1):1517929. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2018.1517929.
9
Analysis of socioeconomic differences in the quality of antenatal services in low and middle-income countries (LMICs).低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)产前服务质量的社会经济差异分析。
PLoS One. 2018 Feb 23;13(2):e0192513. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192513. eCollection 2018.
10
Cascade of access to interventions to prevent HIV mother to child transmission in the metropolitan area of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.巴西里约热内卢大都市区预防艾滋病毒母婴传播干预措施的连续获得。
Braz J Infect Dis. 2014 May-Jun;18(3):252-60. doi: 10.1016/j.bjid.2013.11.002. Epub 2014 Jan 2.