• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

应用对比增强超声评估钝性腹部创伤患者的腹部实质脏器损伤。

The use of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for the evaluation of solid abdominal organ injury in patients with blunt abdominal trauma.

机构信息

School of Medicine, Virginia Tech Carilion, Roanoke, Virginia, USA.

出版信息

J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012 Nov;73(5):1100-5. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31825a74b5.

DOI:10.1097/TA.0b013e31825a74b5
PMID:22832765
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The evaluation and management of blunt abdominal trauma is primarily nonoperative. Previous attempts to identify parenchymal solid-organ injury with sonography have been unsatisfactory. The use of Perflutren Lipid Microsphere (Definity) contrast-enhanced ultrasound (DUS) may provide an additional modality for evaluation of solid-organ injury with decreased risk of radiation exposure and contrast-related complications.

METHODS

Injured patients admitted to a state-designated Level I trauma center (January 2008 to July 2009), who showed evidence of solid-organ injury after blunt abdominal trauma on initial computed tomography (CT) were eligible for entry into the study. Patients underwent DUS examinations within 12 hours of initial CT. Ultrasound images were then compared with findings of CT for organ location, size, and grade of injury.

RESULTS

Twenty patients with evidence of solid-organ injury on CT were evaluated with DUS. DUS correctly identified five of eight liver lesions, with a sensitivity of 62.5%. DUS correctly identified all nine splenic lesions demonstrating a sensitivity of 100%. DUS correctly identified one of two kidney injuries, demonstrating a sensitivity of 50%. Overall, the positive predictive value for all solid-organ injuries was 100%, with negative predictive value of 20%. The overall sensitivity for DUS was 79% (15 of 19 patients), and specificity was 100% (15 of 15 patients).

CONCLUSION

Contrast-enhanced sonography is a potential new modality for the evaluation of solid-organ injury for patients with blunt abdominal trauma. With further research, DUS may provide a safe and accurate alternative to CT.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic study, level IV.

摘要

背景

钝性腹部创伤的评估和管理主要是非手术的。以前,人们尝试使用超声来评估实质脏器损伤,但效果并不理想。使用 Perflutren Lipid Microsphere(Definity)造影超声(DUS)可能为评估实质脏器损伤提供一种新的方法,同时还可以降低辐射暴露和造影剂相关并发症的风险。

方法

本研究纳入了 2008 年 1 月至 2009 年 7 月期间在州指定的一级创伤中心接受治疗、受伤后立即行 CT 检查显示有实质脏器损伤的患者。在 CT 检查后 12 小时内行 DUS 检查。然后,将超声图像与 CT 检查的结果进行比较,比较内容包括脏器位置、大小和损伤分级。

结果

在 20 名 CT 检查显示有实质脏器损伤的患者中,有 20 名接受了 DUS 检查。DUS 正确识别了 8 个肝脏病变中的 5 个,敏感性为 62.5%。DUS 正确识别了 9 个脾脏病变中的 9 个,敏感性为 100%。DUS 正确识别了 2 个肾脏损伤中的 1 个,敏感性为 50%。总的来说,所有实质脏器损伤的阳性预测值为 100%,阴性预测值为 20%。DUS 的总体敏感性为 79%(15/19 例患者),特异性为 100%(15/15 例患者)。

结论

对比增强超声是评估钝性腹部创伤患者实质脏器损伤的一种潜在的新方法。随着进一步的研究,DUS 可能为 CT 检查提供一种安全、准确的替代方法。

证据等级

诊断研究,IV 级。

相似文献

1
The use of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for the evaluation of solid abdominal organ injury in patients with blunt abdominal trauma.应用对比增强超声评估钝性腹部创伤患者的腹部实质脏器损伤。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012 Nov;73(5):1100-5. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31825a74b5.
2
Accuracy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the identification and characterization of traumatic solid organ lesions in children: a retrospective comparison with baseline US and CE-MDCT.对比增强超声(CEUS)在儿童创伤性实性器官病变识别与特征描述中的准确性:与基线超声及对比增强多层螺旋CT的回顾性比较
Radiol Med. 2015 Nov;120(11):989-1001. doi: 10.1007/s11547-015-0535-z. Epub 2015 Mar 31.
3
Contrast enhanced ultrasound for the evaluation of blunt pediatric abdominal trauma.超声造影在小儿腹部钝性创伤中的应用价值评估。
J Pediatr Surg. 2018 Mar;53(3):548-552. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2017.03.042. Epub 2017 Mar 20.
4
Blunt abdominal trauma: does the use of a second-generation sonographic contrast agent help to detect solid organ injuries?钝性腹部创伤:使用第二代超声造影剂有助于检测实质性器官损伤吗?
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004 Nov;183(5):1293-301. doi: 10.2214/ajr.183.5.1831293.
5
Blunt abdominal trauma: emergency contrast-enhanced sonography for detection of solid organ injuries.钝性腹部创伤:用于检测实体器官损伤的急诊对比增强超声检查
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006 May;186(5):1361-7. doi: 10.2214/AJR.05.0027.
6
Comparison between MRI and CEUS in the follow-up of patients with blunt abdominal trauma managed conservatively.磁共振成像(MRI)与超声造影(CEUS)在保守治疗的钝性腹部创伤患者随访中的比较。
Radiol Med. 2016 Jan;121(1):27-37. doi: 10.1007/s11547-015-0578-1. Epub 2015 Aug 8.
7
Blunt abdominal trauma: diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced US in children--initial experience.钝性腹部创伤:超声造影在儿童中的诊断效能——初步经验
Radiology. 2008 Mar;246(3):903-9. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2463070652. Epub 2008 Jan 14.
8
Renal ultrasound to evaluate for blunt renal trauma in children: A retrospective comparison to contrast enhanced CT imaging.肾脏超声评估儿童钝性肾损伤:与对比增强CT成像的回顾性比较
J Pediatr Urol. 2020 Oct;16(5):557.e1-557.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2020.04.020. Epub 2020 Apr 29.
9
Diagnostic value of ultrasonography in the evaluation of blunt abdominal trauma.超声检查在钝性腹部创伤评估中的诊断价值
Diagn Interv Radiol. 2005 Mar;11(1):41-4.
10
Admission or observation is not necessary after a negative abdominal computed tomographic scan in patients with suspected blunt abdominal trauma: results of a prospective, multi-institutional trial.对于疑似钝性腹部创伤的患者,腹部计算机断层扫描结果为阴性后无需入院或观察:一项前瞻性多机构试验的结果
J Trauma. 1998 Feb;44(2):273-80; discussion 280-2. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199802000-00005.

引用本文的文献

1
Renal Trauma: A 4-Year Retrospective Review of Injury Severity, Treatment Approaches, and Outcomes from a Polish Trauma Center.肾创伤:波兰一家创伤中心对损伤严重程度、治疗方法及结果的4年回顾性研究
Clin Pract. 2025 Mar 21;15(4):67. doi: 10.3390/clinpract15040067.
2
Detection of post-traumatic abdominal pseudoaneurysms by CEUS and CT: A prospective comparative global study (the PseAn study)-study protocol.对比增强超声(CEUS)和CT检测创伤后腹部假性动脉瘤:一项前瞻性全球比较研究(PseAn研究)——研究方案
Front Surg. 2023 Feb 20;10:1124087. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1124087. eCollection 2023.
3
Point-of-care ultrasonography for diagnosing thoracoabdominal injuries in patients with blunt trauma.
床旁超声检查在钝性创伤患者胸腹部损伤诊断中的应用
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Dec 12;12(12):CD012669. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012669.pub2.
4
Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography: A Promising Method for Blood Flow and Perfusion Evaluation in Critically Ill Patients.对比增强超声检查:一种用于评估危重症患者血流和灌注的有前景的方法。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2018 May 20;131(10):1135-1137. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.231527.
5
Diagnostic accuracy of contrast enhanced ultrasound in patients with blunt abdominal trauma presenting to the emergency department: a systematic review and meta-analysis.急诊钝性腹部创伤患者对比增强超声的诊断准确性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Sci Rep. 2017 Jun 30;7(1):4446. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-04779-2.
6
Contrast-enhanced ultrasound of the spleen.脾脏的超声造影检查
Ultrasound. 2016 Feb;24(1):41-9. doi: 10.1177/1742271X15617214. Epub 2016 Jan 14.
7
Diagnostic imaging of blunt abdominal trauma in pediatric patients.小儿钝性腹部创伤的诊断影像学。
Radiol Med. 2016 May;121(5):409-30. doi: 10.1007/s11547-016-0637-2. Epub 2016 Apr 13.
8
International guidelines for contrast-enhanced ultrasonography: ultrasound imaging in the new millennium.国际对比增强超声造影指南:新世纪的超声成像
Ultrasonography. 2016 Apr;35(2):89-103. doi: 10.14366/usg.15057. Epub 2015 Dec 23.
9
Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in blunt abdominal trauma.腹部钝性创伤中的超声造影(CEUS)
Br J Radiol. 2016;89(1061):20150823. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20150823. Epub 2016 Jan 8.
10
Non-operative management attempted for selective high grade blunt hepatosplenic trauma is a feasible strategy.对于选择性高等级钝性肝脾创伤,尝试非手术治疗是一种可行的策略。
World J Emerg Surg. 2014 Sep 25;9(1):51. doi: 10.1186/1749-7922-9-51. eCollection 2014.