Raven Melissa, Parry Peter
Discipline of Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2012 Jun;200(6):512-6. doi: 10.1097/nmd.0b013e318257c6c7.
The descriptive diagnostic model since DSM-III has often led to "cookbook" diagnosis and assumptions of "chemical imbalance" for psychiatric disorders. Pharmaceutical companies have exploited this in their marketing. This includes promoting self-diagnosis with online checklists. Significant overprescribing of psychotropics has resulted. DSM-5 will provide new disorders and broader diagnostic criteria that will likely exacerbate this. Most psychotropic prescribing is done by primary care physicians, who are problematically excluded from DSM-5 field trials and are influenced by industry funded key opinion leaders who may promote diagnosis of subthreshold cases. More lax criteria will increase diagnosis of subthreshold cases. Expansion of not otherwise specified (NOS) categories can be used to justify off-label promotion. Pediatric bipolar disorder, constructed within the bipolar disorder NOS category, became an "epidemic" in the United States, fuelled by diagnostic upcoding pressures. Disruptive mood dysregulation disorder may similarly cause overdiagnosis and excessive prescribing, as will other new disorders and lower diagnostic thresholds.
自《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版(DSM - III)以来的描述性诊断模型常常导致“照本宣科”式的诊断以及对精神疾病“化学失衡”的假设。制药公司在其营销中利用了这一点,包括通过在线清单推广自我诊断。这导致了精神药物的大量过度开方。《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版(DSM - 5)将提供新的疾病分类和更宽泛的诊断标准,这可能会使情况恶化。大多数精神药物的开方是由初级保健医生进行的,他们被有问题地排除在DSM - 5的现场试验之外,并且受到行业资助的关键意见领袖的影响,这些领袖可能会推动对阈下病例的诊断。更宽松的标准将增加对阈下病例的诊断。“未另行规定”(NOS)类别的扩展可被用于为标签外推广提供理由。在双相情感障碍NOS类别中构建的儿童双相情感障碍在美国成为一种“流行病”,诊断升级压力起到了推波助澜的作用。破坏性情绪失调障碍可能同样会导致过度诊断和过度开方,其他新的疾病分类和更低的诊断阈值也会如此。