Hoewe Jennifer, Zeldes Geri Alumit
The Pennsylvania State University, University Park.
J Black Stud. 2012;43(4):427-43. doi: 10.1177/0021934711428070.
This study fills a gap in scholarship by exploring historical news coverage of interracial relationships. It examines coverage by The New York Times, Washington Post and Times-Herald, and Chicago Tribune of the progression of the landmark civil rights case of Loving v. Virginia, in which the Supreme Court overturned Virginia's anti-miscegenation law, which prohibited marriage between any White and non-White person. An analysis of the frames and sources used in these publications' news stories about the case indicate all three publications' coverage favored the Lovings.
本研究通过探索关于跨种族关系的历史新闻报道填补了学术空白。它考察了《纽约时报》《华盛顿邮报》《时代先驱报》和《芝加哥论坛报》对具有里程碑意义的民权案件“洛文诉弗吉尼亚州案”进展情况的报道，在该案件中，最高法院推翻了弗吉尼亚州的反异族通婚法，该法律禁止任何白人与非白人之间通婚。对这些出版物关于该案件的新闻报道中所使用的框架和来源进行分析表明，这三家出版物的报道都偏向洛文夫妇一方。
