Suppr超能文献

正常听力和听力受损听众在阈值时的总和带宽。

Summation bandwidths at threshold in normal and hearing-impaired listeners.

作者信息

Higgins M B, Turner C W

机构信息

Boys Town National Research Hospital, Omaha, Nebraska 68131.

出版信息

J Acoust Soc Am. 1990 Dec;88(6):2625-30. doi: 10.1121/1.399982.

Abstract

The bandwidths for summation at threshold were measured for subjects with normal hearing and subjects with sensorineural hearing loss. Thresholds in quiet and in the presence of a masking noise were measured for complex stimuli consisting of 1 to 40 pure-tone components spaced 20 Hz apart. The single component condition consisted of a single pure tone at 1100 Hz; additional components were added below this frequency, in a replication of the Gässler [Acustica 4, 408-414 (1954)] procedure. For the normal subjects, thresholds increased approximately 3 dB per doubling of bandwidth for signal bandwidths exceeding the critical bandwidth. This slope was less for the hearing-impaired subjects. Summation bandwidths, as estimated from two-line fits, were wider for the hearing-impaired than for the normal subjects. These findings provide evidence that hearing-impaired subjects integrate sound energy over a wider-than-normal frequency range for the detection of complex signals. A second experiment used stimuli similar to those of Spiegel [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 66, 1356-1363 (1979)], and added components both above and below the frequency of the initial component. Using these stimuli, the slope of the threshold increase beyond the critical bandwidth was approximately 1.5 dB per doubling of bandwidth, thus replicating the Spiegel (1979) experiment. It is concluded that the differences between the Gässler (1954) and Spiegel (1979) studies were due to the different frequency content of the stimuli used in each study. Based upon the present results, it would appear that the slope of threshold increase is dependent upon the direction of signal expansion, and the size of the critical bands into which the signal is expanded.

摘要

对听力正常的受试者和感音神经性听力损失的受试者测量了阈值处的总和带宽。针对由1至40个纯音成分组成、间隔20 Hz的复杂刺激,测量了安静环境下以及存在掩蔽噪声时的阈值。单成分条件由1100 Hz的单个纯音组成;按照盖斯勒[《声学学报》4, 408 - 414 (1954)]的程序,在该频率以下添加其他成分。对于正常受试者,当信号带宽超过临界带宽时,阈值每翻倍带宽大约增加3 dB。听力受损受试者的这个斜率较小。根据二线拟合估计,听力受损受试者的总和带宽比正常受试者更宽。这些发现提供了证据,表明听力受损受试者在检测复杂信号时,在比正常更宽的频率范围内整合声能。第二个实验使用了与施皮格尔[《美国声学学会杂志》66, 1356 - 1363 (1979)]类似的刺激,并在初始成分频率之上和之下都添加了成分。使用这些刺激,超过临界带宽时阈值增加的斜率大约是每翻倍带宽1.5 dB,从而重复了施皮格尔(1979)的实验。得出的结论是,盖斯勒(1954)和施皮格尔(1979)研究之间的差异是由于每项研究中使用的刺激频率内容不同。基于目前的结果,似乎阈值增加的斜率取决于信号扩展的方向以及信号扩展到的临界带的大小。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验