Neuromotor Plasticity and Development, The Robinson Institute, School of Paediatrics and Reproductive Health, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
Brain Stimul. 2013 May;6(3):340-5. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2012.06.005. Epub 2012 Jul 5.
Continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) suppresses the excitability of motor networks responsible for generating motor evoked potentials (MEPs), and may also modulates the excitability of inhibitory motor networks. However, its effects on intracortical inhibition are modest in comparison to the effects on MEPs. The repeated, spaced, application of cTBS protocols results in more MEP suppression than seen with a single cTBS protocol, but whether this approach is also effective at modulating intracortical inhibition has not been tested.
To determine whether the paired application of cTBS effectively modulates the excitability of intracortical inhibitory motor networks.
Single and paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) were used to assess resting motor threshold (RMT), MEP amplitude, short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI), and long-interval intracortical inhibition (LICI) before and during two time periods (0-10 and 30-40 min) following application of either a single or paired cTBS protocols.
Both the single and paired cTBS conditions induced a significant reduction in both MEP amplitudes and the level of SICI. While paired cTBS produced a significantly greater MEP suppression than single cTBS, the effects on SICI were similar. Neither single nor paired cTBS had an effect on RMT or LICI.
Although the repeated application of cTBS protocols may be effective for enhancing modulation of the MEP-generating excitatory motor networks, these findings suggest that this approach offers little advantage when targeting intracortical inhibitory networks.
连续 theta 爆发刺激(cTBS)抑制了产生运动诱发电位(MEP)的运动网络的兴奋性,并且还可能调节抑制性运动网络的兴奋性。然而,与对 MEP 的影响相比,其对皮质内抑制的影响较小。重复、间隔的 cTBS 方案的应用导致 MEP 抑制作用比单次 cTBS 方案更明显,但这种方法是否也能有效地调节皮质内抑制作用尚未得到测试。
确定配对应用 cTBS 是否能有效地调节皮质内抑制性运动网络的兴奋性。
使用单脉冲和双脉冲经颅磁刺激(TMS)在应用单或双 cTBS 方案前后的两个时间段(0-10 和 30-40 分钟)评估静息运动阈值(RMT)、MEP 幅度、短间隔皮质内抑制(SICI)和长间隔皮质内抑制(LICI)。
单和双 cTBS 条件均导致 MEP 幅度和 SICI 水平显著降低。虽然双 cTBS 引起的 MEP 抑制作用明显大于单 cTBS,但对 SICI 的影响相似。单或双 cTBS 均未对 RMT 或 LICI 产生影响。
尽管重复应用 cTBS 方案可能有效增强对产生 MEP 的兴奋性运动网络的调制,但这些发现表明,当针对皮质内抑制性网络时,这种方法几乎没有优势。