• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

运动网络连通性可预测健康成年人接受 theta 爆发刺激后的神经可塑性反应。

Motor network connectivity predicts neuroplastic response following theta burst stimulation in healthy adults.

机构信息

Innovation, Implementation and Clinical Translation (IIMPACT) in Health, University of South Australia, City East Campus, GPO Box 2471, Adelaide, South, 5001, Australia.

Lifespan Human Neurophysiology Group, Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, 5005, Australia.

出版信息

Brain Struct Funct. 2021 Jul;226(6):1893-1907. doi: 10.1007/s00429-021-02299-4. Epub 2021 May 27.

DOI:10.1007/s00429-021-02299-4
PMID:34043076
Abstract

A patterned repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation protocol, known as continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS), can suppress corticospinal excitability via mechanisms that appear similar to long-term depression synaptic plasticity. Despite much potential, this technique is currently limited by substantial response variability. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether baseline resting state functional connectivity is a determinant of response to cTBS. Eighteen healthy young adults participated in up to three experimental sessions. Single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation was used to quantify change in corticospinal excitability following cTBS. Three minutes of resting electroencephalographic activity was recorded, and functional connectivity was estimated using the debiased weighted phase lag index across different frequency bands. Partial least squares regression identified models of connectivity between a seed region (C3) and the whole scalp that maximally accounted for variance in cTBS responses. There was no group-level effect of a single cTBS train or spaced cTBS trains on corticospinal excitability (p = 0.092). A low beta frequency band model of connectivity accounted for the largest proportion of variance in spaced cTBS response (R = 0.50). Based on the low beta frequency model, a-priori regions of interest were identified and predicted 39% of variance in response to spaced cTBS at a subsequent session. Importantly, weaker connectivity between the seed electrode (C3) and a cluster approximating a frontocentral region was associated with greater spaced cTBS response (p = 0.02). It appears M1-frontocentral networks may have an important role in determining the effects of cTBS on corticospinal excitability.

摘要

一种模式化的重复性经颅磁刺激方案,即连续 theta 爆发刺激(cTBS),可以通过类似于长时程抑郁突触可塑性的机制来抑制皮质脊髓兴奋性。尽管有很大的潜力,但这种技术目前受到很大的反应可变性的限制。本研究的目的是探讨静息状态功能连接是否是对 cTBS 反应的决定因素。18 名健康年轻成年人参与了多达三个实验疗程。单脉冲经颅磁刺激用于量化 cTBS 后皮质脊髓兴奋性的变化。记录了 3 分钟的静息脑电图活动,并使用无偏加权相位滞后指数在不同频带之间估计功能连接。偏最小二乘回归确定了种子区域(C3)和整个头皮之间的连接模型,这些模型最大限度地解释了 cTBS 反应的变异性。单次 cTBS 训练或间隔 cTBS 训练对皮质脊髓兴奋性没有组水平的影响(p=0.092)。连接的低β频带模型解释了间隔 cTBS 反应变异性的最大比例(R=0.50)。基于低β频带模型,确定了先验的感兴趣区域,并预测了在随后的会议上间隔 cTBS 反应的 39%的变异性。重要的是,种子电极(C3)和一个近似额顶区域的集群之间的连接较弱与较大的间隔 cTBS 反应相关(p=0.02)。似乎 M1-额顶网络在确定 cTBS 对皮质脊髓兴奋性的影响方面可能起着重要作用。

相似文献

1
Motor network connectivity predicts neuroplastic response following theta burst stimulation in healthy adults.运动网络连通性可预测健康成年人接受 theta 爆发刺激后的神经可塑性反应。
Brain Struct Funct. 2021 Jul;226(6):1893-1907. doi: 10.1007/s00429-021-02299-4. Epub 2021 May 27.
2
Neuroplasticity and network connectivity of the motor cortex following stroke: A transcranial direct current stimulation study.脑卒后运动皮层的神经可塑性和网络连通性:经颅直流电刺激研究。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2018 Aug;39(8):3326-3339. doi: 10.1002/hbm.24079. Epub 2018 Apr 14.
3
Inter- and intra-subject variability of motor cortex plasticity following continuous theta-burst stimulation.连续θ波爆发刺激后运动皮层可塑性的受试者间和受试者内变异性。
Neuroscience. 2015 Sep 24;304:266-78. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2015.07.043. Epub 2015 Jul 21.
4
Cortical oscillatory activity and the induction of plasticity in the human motor cortex.皮质振荡活动与人类运动皮层的可塑性诱导。
Eur J Neurosci. 2011 May;33(10):1916-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2011.07673.x. Epub 2011 Apr 13.
5
Oscillatory beta activity mediates neuroplastic effects of motor cortex stimulation in humans.振荡β活动介导了人类运动皮层刺激的神经可塑性效应。
J Neurosci. 2013 May 1;33(18):7919-27. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5624-12.2013.
6
Priming theta-burst repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation with low- and high-frequency stimulation.采用低频和高频刺激启动theta爆发式重复经颅磁刺激
Exp Brain Res. 2009 May;195(2):307-15. doi: 10.1007/s00221-009-1791-8. Epub 2009 Apr 11.
7
Insights on the neural basis of motor plasticity induced by theta burst stimulation from TMS-EEG.经 TMS-EEG 观察到的 theta 爆发刺激诱导运动可塑性的神经基础。
Eur J Neurosci. 2013 Feb;37(4):598-606. doi: 10.1111/ejn.12069. Epub 2012 Nov 28.
8
Reproducibility of the effects of theta burst stimulation on motor cortical plasticity in healthy participants.健康参与者中 theta 爆发刺激对运动皮质可塑性影响的可重复性。
Clin Neurophysiol. 2014 Feb;125(2):320-6. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2013.07.004. Epub 2013 Aug 7.
9
Resting state functional connectivity measures correlate with the response to anodal transcranial direct current stimulation.静息态功能连接测量值与阳极经颅直流电刺激的反应相关。
Eur J Neurosci. 2017 Mar;45(6):837-845. doi: 10.1111/ejn.13508. Epub 2017 Jan 18.
10
Neuroplastic modulation of inhibitory motor cortical networks by spaced theta burst stimulation protocols.经空间 theta 爆发刺激方案对抑制性运动皮质网络的神经可塑性调节。
Brain Stimul. 2013 May;6(3):340-5. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2012.06.005. Epub 2012 Jul 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Parietal Cortex Connectivity as a Marker of Shift in Spatial Attention Following Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation.顶叶皮层连接性作为连续theta爆发刺激后空间注意力转移的标志物。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2021 Sep 8;15:718662. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.718662. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Towards Targeted Brain Stimulation in Stroke: Connectivity as a Biomarker of Response.迈向中风的靶向脑刺激:连通性作为反应的生物标志物
J Exp Neurosci. 2018 Nov 5;12:1179069518809060. doi: 10.1177/1179069518809060. eCollection 2018.
2
Neuroplasticity and network connectivity of the motor cortex following stroke: A transcranial direct current stimulation study.脑卒后运动皮层的神经可塑性和网络连通性:经颅直流电刺激研究。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2018 Aug;39(8):3326-3339. doi: 10.1002/hbm.24079. Epub 2018 Apr 14.
3
Using non-invasive transcranial stimulation to improve motor and cognitive function in Parkinson's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
使用非侵入性经颅刺激改善帕金森病的运动和认知功能:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Sci Rep. 2017 Nov 1;7(1):14840. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-13260-z.
4
A Data-Driven Approach to Responder Subgroup Identification after Paired Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation.一种基于数据驱动的配对连续 theta 爆发刺激后反应者亚组识别方法。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2017 Aug 4;11:382. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00382. eCollection 2017.
5
Priming theta burst stimulation enhances motor cortex plasticity in young but not old adults.经预刺激的 theta 爆发刺激增强年轻成年人而不是老年成年人运动皮层的可塑性。
Brain Stimul. 2017 Mar-Apr;10(2):298-304. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2017.01.003. Epub 2017 Jan 4.
6
Variability in neural excitability and plasticity induction in the human cortex: A brain stimulation study.人类皮层神经兴奋性和可塑性诱导的变异性:一项脑刺激研究。
Brain Stimul. 2017 May-Jun;10(3):588-595. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2016.12.001. Epub 2016 Dec 9.
7
Resting state functional connectivity measures correlate with the response to anodal transcranial direct current stimulation.静息态功能连接测量值与阳极经颅直流电刺激的反应相关。
Eur J Neurosci. 2017 Mar;45(6):837-845. doi: 10.1111/ejn.13508. Epub 2017 Jan 18.
8
Minimum number of trials required for within- and between-session reliability of TMS measures of corticospinal excitability.经颅磁刺激测量皮质脊髓兴奋性的组内和组间信度所需的最少试验次数。
Neuroscience. 2016 Apr 21;320:205-9. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2016.02.012. Epub 2016 Feb 9.
9
A Tutorial Review of Functional Connectivity Analysis Methods and Their Interpretational Pitfalls.功能连接性分析方法及其解释误区的教程式综述
Front Syst Neurosci. 2016 Jan 8;9:175. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2015.00175. eCollection 2015.
10
Inter-individual variability in cortical excitability and motor network connectivity following multiple blocks of rTMS.多次重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)后皮质兴奋性和运动网络连接的个体间变异性。
Neuroimage. 2015 Sep;118:209-18. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.06.004. Epub 2015 Jun 5.