Suppr超能文献

在背外侧前额叶皮层进行连续theta爆发刺激后,没有证据表明γ-氨基丁酸(GABA)浓度、功能连接性或工作记忆发生变化。

No evidence for changes in GABA concentration, functional connectivity, or working memory following continuous theta burst stimulation over dorsolateral prefrontal cortex.

作者信息

Thapa Tribikram, Hendrikse Joshua, Thompson Sarah, Suo Chao, Biabani Mana, Morrow James, Hoy Kate E, Fitzgerald Paul B, Fornito Alex, Rogasch Nigel C

机构信息

Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, and Monash Biomedical Imaging, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Epworth Centre for Innovation in Mental Health, Epworth Healthcare and Department of Psychiatry, Monash University, 888 Toorak Rd, Camberwell, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Neuroimage Rep. 2021 Nov 17;1(4):100061. doi: 10.1016/j.ynirp.2021.100061. eCollection 2021 Dec.

Abstract

Continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) is thought to reduce cortical excitability and modulate functional connectivity, possibly by altering cortical inhibition at the site of stimulation. However, most evidence comes from the motor cortex and it remains unclear whether similar effects occur following stimulation over other brain regions. We assessed whether cTBS over left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex altered gamma aminobutyric acid (GABA) concentration, functional connectivity and brain dynamics at rest, and brain activation and memory performance during a working memory task. Seventeen healthy individuals participated in a randomised, sham-controlled, cross-over experiment. Before and after either real or sham cTBS, magnetic resonance spectroscopy was obtained at rest to measure GABA concentrations. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was also recorded at rest and during an n-back working memory task to measure functional connectivity, regional brain activity (low-frequency fluctuations), and task-related patterns of brain activity. We could not find evidence for changes in GABA concentration ( = 0.66, Bayes factor [BF] = 0.07), resting-state functional connectivity (  > 0.05), resting-state low-frequency fluctuations ( = 0.88, BF = 0.04), blood-oxygen level dependent activity during the n-back task (  > 0.05), or working memory performance ( = 0.13, BF = 0.05) following real or sham cTBS. Our findings add to a growing body of literature suggesting the effects of cTBS are highly variable between individuals and question the notion that cTBS is a universal 'inhibitory' paradigm.

摘要

连续θ波刺激(cTBS)被认为可以降低皮质兴奋性并调节功能连接,可能是通过改变刺激部位的皮质抑制来实现的。然而,大多数证据来自运动皮层,目前尚不清楚在其他脑区进行刺激后是否会产生类似的效果。我们评估了对左侧背外侧前额叶皮层进行cTBS是否会改变静息状态下的γ-氨基丁酸(GABA)浓度、功能连接和脑动力学,以及在工作记忆任务期间的脑激活和记忆表现。17名健康个体参与了一项随机、假刺激对照、交叉实验。在进行真实或假cTBS之前和之后,在静息状态下进行磁共振波谱分析以测量GABA浓度。还在静息状态和n-back工作记忆任务期间记录功能磁共振成像(fMRI),以测量功能连接、局部脑活动(低频波动)以及与任务相关的脑活动模式。我们没有发现证据表明真实或假cTBS后GABA浓度(P = 0.66,贝叶斯因子[BF] = 0.07)、静息态功能连接(P > 0.05)、静息态低频波动(P = 0.88,BF = 0.04)、n-back任务期间的血氧水平依赖活动(P > 0.05)或工作记忆表现(P = 0.13,BF = 0.05)发生了变化。我们的研究结果进一步丰富了越来越多的文献,表明cTBS的效果在个体之间差异很大,并对cTBS是一种普遍的“抑制性”范式这一观点提出了质疑。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b749/12172724/7a0a5cb4c777/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验