Suppr超能文献

经颅超声小脑测量评估胎龄:哪种方法最佳?

Assessment of gestational age using cerebellar measurements at cranial ultrasound: what is the best approach?

机构信息

Serviço de Neonatologia, Departamento de Pediatria, Hospital de Santa Maria/Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.

出版信息

Early Hum Dev. 2013 Jan;89(1):1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2012.07.008. Epub 2012 Jul 24.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Clinical assessment of gestational age (GA) in preterm infants can be challenging. Several ultrasound approaches for estimating GA using cerebellar measurements are reported, claiming to be simpler and more accurate than clinical assessment, but they are not widely used. We aimed to compare the accuracy of four previously described measurements and compare their use in preterm infants.

METHODS

We studied infants <32weeks of GA defined by in-vitro fertilization date or early fetal ultrasound, excluding infants with neurological problems. Vermis anterior-posterior diameter (VAPD), vermis height (VH), and transverse cerebellar diameter via anterior (TCDa) and mastoid fontanelles (TCDm) were measured.Estimated PMA was calculated using published equations, and compared to known PMA using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Intra and inter-observer reliability were determined.

RESULTS

We studied 80 infants (mean GA 28.5weeks [range 24-32], mean post-natal age 5.7days). ICC was 0.761 (VAPD), 0.632 (VH), 0.115 (TCDa) and 0.825 (TCDm). The TCDm equation gave the best estimate of GA (mean estimate -2days; 95% CI±13.8days). TCDa and TCDm absolute measurements were similar for each infant. Accuracy for estimating GA was similar for appropriately grown and small-for-gestation infants. Inter and intra-observer reliability was very good for all measurements.

CONCLUSIONS

Three previously described equations for estimating GA from cerebellar measurements gave good estimates of GA in preterms. The equation described for TCDm gave the narrowest 95% CI. We recommend the TCDm equation for the estimation of GA in VLBW infants but the TCD measurement can be made via either the anterior or mastoid fontanelle.

摘要

背景与目的

临床评估早产儿的胎龄(GA)可能具有挑战性。有几种使用小脑测量值来估计 GA 的超声方法已被报道,据称比临床评估更简单、更准确,但并未广泛应用。我们旨在比较之前描述的四种测量方法的准确性,并比较它们在早产儿中的应用。

方法

我们研究了通过体外受精日期或早期胎儿超声定义的<32 周 GA 的婴儿,排除了有神经问题的婴儿。测量了 vermis 前后直径(VAPD)、vermis 高度(VH)以及通过前囟(TCDa)和乳突囟门(TCDm)的横向小脑直径。使用已发表的公式计算估计的 PMA,并使用组内相关系数(ICC)与已知的 PMA 进行比较。确定了观察者内和观察者间的可靠性。

结果

我们研究了 80 名婴儿(平均 GA 为 28.5 周[范围 24-32],平均产后年龄为 5.7 天)。ICC 为 0.761(VAPD)、0.632(VH)、0.115(TCDa)和 0.825(TCDm)。TCDm 方程对 GA 的估计最好(平均估计值为-2 天;95%CI±13.8 天)。对于每个婴儿,TCDa 和 TCDm 的绝对测量值相似。对于适当生长和小于胎龄的婴儿,估计 GA 的准确性相似。所有测量的观察者内和观察者间可靠性均非常好。

结论

三种以前描述的从小脑测量值估计 GA 的方程在早产儿中可以很好地估计 GA。描述的 TCDm 方程给出了最窄的 95%CI。我们建议在极低出生体重儿中使用 TCDm 方程来估计 GA,但 TCD 测量可以通过前囟或乳突囟门进行。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验