• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

另一种“人格描述”:大五因素结构。

An alternative "description of personality": the big-five factor structure.

作者信息

Goldberg L R

机构信息

University of Oregon, Eugene.

出版信息

J Pers Soc Psychol. 1990 Dec;59(6):1216-29. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.59.6.1216.

DOI:10.1037//0022-3514.59.6.1216
PMID:2283588
Abstract

In the 45 years since Cattell used English trait terms to begin the formulation of his "description of personality," a number of investigators have proposed an alternative structure based on 5 orthogonal factors. The generality of this 5-factor model is here demonstrated across unusually comprehensive sets of trait terms. In the first of 3 studies, 1,431 trait adjectives grouped into 75 clusters were analyzed; virtually identical structures emerged in 10 replications, each based on a different factor-analytic procedure. A 2nd study of 479 common terms grouped into 133 synonym clusters revealed the same structure in 2 samples of self-ratings and in 2 samples of peer ratings. None of the factors beyond the 5th generalized across the samples. In the 3rd study, analyses of 100 clusters derived from 339 trait terms suggest their potential utility as Big-Five markers in future studies.

摘要

自卡特尔用英语特质术语开始构建其“人格描述”以来的45年里,许多研究者提出了一种基于五个正交因素的替代结构。本文通过异常全面的特质术语集证明了这种五因素模型的普遍性。在三项研究的第一项中,对1431个特质形容词进行了分析,这些形容词被归为75个类别;在10次重复分析中出现了几乎相同的结构,每次分析都基于不同的因素分析程序。第二项研究对479个常用术语进行了分析,这些术语被归为133个同义词类别,在两份自评样本和两份同伴评价样本中都揭示了相同的结构。除第五个因素外,没有其他因素在各样本中具有普遍性。在第三项研究中,对从339个特质术语中衍生出的100个类别进行的分析表明,它们在未来研究中作为大五人格标记具有潜在效用。

相似文献

1
An alternative "description of personality": the big-five factor structure.另一种“人格描述”:大五因素结构。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1990 Dec;59(6):1216-29. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.59.6.1216.
2
Asymmetry in judgments of personality: others are less differentiated than the self.人格判断中的不对称性:他人比自我的区分度更低。
J Pers. 2008 Jun;76(3):535-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2008.00495.x. Epub 2008 Apr 8.
3
The structure of Turkish trait-descriptive adjectives.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1999 Mar;76(3):431-50. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.76.3.431.
4
The relationship of personality traits as measured in the questionnaire medium and by self-ratings.通过问卷方式以及自我评定所测量的人格特质之间的关系。
J Psychol. 1975 Nov;91(2d Half):173-82. doi: 10.1080/00223980.1975.9923939.
5
Effects of variable selection on the factor structure of person descriptors.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1997 Dec;73(6):1296-312. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.73.6.1296.
6
Unifying the aspects of the Big Five, the interpersonal circumplex, and trait affiliation.统一大五人格、人际关系双元模型和特质关联。
J Pers. 2013 Oct;81(5):465-75. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12020. Epub 2013 Feb 21.
7
The factor structure of Chinese personality terms.汉语人格术语的因素结构。
J Pers. 2009 Apr;77(2):363-400. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2008.00551.x. Epub 2009 Feb 2.
8
Hierarchical structure of personality in patients with acute myocardial infarction.
Psychol Rep. 1997 Aug;81(1):175-86. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1997.81.1.175.
9
Metatraits of the Big Five differentially predict engagement and restraint of behavior.大五人格的元特质对行为的参与和抑制有不同的预测作用。
J Pers. 2009 Aug;77(4):1085-102. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2009.00575.x. Epub 2009 May 19.
10
Ratings of interpersonal conduct in small groups by aggregated peers and self: replicated factor analyses.
J Soc Psychol. 1996 Oct;136(5):597-611. doi: 10.1080/00224545.1996.9714044.

引用本文的文献

1
GPT-4V shows human-like social perceptual capabilities at phenomenological and neural levels.GPT-4V在现象学和神经层面展现出类人的社会感知能力。
Imaging Neurosci (Camb). 2025 Sep 2;3. doi: 10.1162/IMAG.a.134. eCollection 2025.
2
EVALUATING JOINT MODELS OF PSYCHOPATHOLOGY AND PERSONALITY ITEMS IN CHILDREN.评估儿童精神病理学和人格项目的联合模型
Pers Individ Dif. 2025 Nov;246. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2025.113385. Epub 2025 Jul 25.
3
Social Environment and Personality Factors Associated with Giving and Receiving Help Among Sober Living House Residents.
与清醒生活之家居民给予和接受帮助相关的社会环境和人格因素。
Alcohol Treat Q. 2025;43(3):414-429. doi: 10.1080/07347324.2024.2448458. Epub 2025 Jan 4.
4
Dimensions of music use motivations: Genetic and environmental underpinnings, and associations with Big Five and Empathy traits.音乐使用动机的维度:遗传和环境基础,以及与大五人格和共情特质的关联。
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 8;20(8):e0329808. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0329808. eCollection 2025.
5
Personal Growth and Wellbeing: An Iterative Mindset Assessment and Perspective.个人成长与幸福:一种迭代式思维模式评估与视角
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Jul 4;15(7):906. doi: 10.3390/bs15070906.
6
Measuring shame in eating disorders: confirmatory factor analyses and psychometric properties of a new internal and external shame scale.饮食失调中羞耻感的测量:一种新的内在与外在羞耻感量表的验证性因素分析及心理测量特性
Eat Weight Disord. 2025 Jul 17;30(1):55. doi: 10.1007/s40519-025-01759-8.
7
Idiographic momentary profiles of personality facets.人格特质的独特即时概况。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2025 Jul 14. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000568.
8
Mechanisms of childhood trauma: an integrative review of a multimodal, transdiagnostic pathway.儿童期创伤的机制:多模式、跨诊断途径的综合综述
Neurobiol Stress. 2025 Jun 3;37:100737. doi: 10.1016/j.ynstr.2025.100737. eCollection 2025 Jul.
9
Cooperative decision-making in borderline personality disorder: insights from a preregistered study using a comprehensive economic task battery.边缘型人格障碍中的合作决策:一项使用综合经济任务组的预注册研究的见解
Borderline Personal Disord Emot Dysregul. 2025 Jun 17;12(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s40479-025-00295-2.
10
Validation of the Polish Self and Interpersonal Functioning Scale (SIFS-PL) in community and clinical samples.波兰自我与人际功能量表(SIFS-PL)在社区和临床样本中的效度验证。
Curr Issues Personal Psychol. 2025 Jan 9;13(2):138-147. doi: 10.5114/cipp/194231. eCollection 2025.