• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

The structure of Turkish trait-descriptive adjectives.

作者信息

Somer O, Goldberg L R

机构信息

Edebiyat Fakultesi, Ege Universitesi, Izmir, Turkiye.

出版信息

J Pers Soc Psychol. 1999 Mar;76(3):431-50. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.76.3.431.

DOI:10.1037//0022-3514.76.3.431
PMID:10101877
Abstract

This description of the Turkish lexical project reports some initial findings on the structure of Turkish personality-related variables. In addition, it provides evidence on the effects of target evaluative homogeneity vs. heterogeneity (e.g., samples of well-liked target individuals vs. samples of both liked and disliked targets) on the resulting factor structures, and thus it provides a first test of the conclusions reached by D. Peabody and L. R. Goldberg (1989) using English trait terms. In 2 separate studies, and in 2 types of data sets, clear versions of the Big Five factor structure were found. And both studies replicated and extended the findings of Peabody and Goldberg; virtually orthogonal factors of relatively equal size were found in the homogeneous samples, and a more highly correlated set of factors with relatively large Agreeableness and Conscientiousness dimensions was found in the heterogeneous samples.

摘要

相似文献

1
The structure of Turkish trait-descriptive adjectives.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1999 Mar;76(3):431-50. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.76.3.431.
2
Factor structure of English-language personality type-nouns.英语中人格类型名词的因素结构。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003 Oct;85(4):695-708. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.85.4.695.
3
The factor structure of Greek personality adjectives.希腊人格形容词的因素结构。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2005 May;88(5):856-75. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.88.5.856.
4
Testing the lexical hypothesis: are socially important traits more densely reflected in the English lexicon?检验词汇假设:社会重要特质在英语词汇中是否有更密集的反映?
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2015 Feb;108(2):317-35. doi: 10.1037/a0038343.
5
An alternative "description of personality": the big-five factor structure.另一种“人格描述”:大五因素结构。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1990 Dec;59(6):1216-29. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.59.6.1216.
6
Separating description and evaluation in the structure of personality attributes.在人格属性结构中分离描述与评价。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1994 Jan;66(1):141-54. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.66.1.141.
7
The factor structure of Lithuanian personality-descriptive adjectives of the highest frequency of use.立陶宛语中使用频率最高的人格描述形容词的因素结构。
Int J Psychol. 2017 Dec;52(6):453-462. doi: 10.1002/ijop.12247. Epub 2016 Jan 18.
8
Unifying the aspects of the Big Five, the interpersonal circumplex, and trait affiliation.统一大五人格、人际关系双元模型和特质关联。
J Pers. 2013 Oct;81(5):465-75. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12020. Epub 2013 Feb 21.
9
A six-factor structure of personality-descriptive adjectives: solutions from psycholexical studies in seven languages.人格描述形容词的六因素结构:来自七种语言心理词汇学研究的解决方案
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2004 Feb;86(2):356-66. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.86.2.356.
10
Situation-based contingencies underlying trait-content manifestation in behavior.行为中特质内容表现所基于的情境性偶然因素。
J Pers. 2007 Aug;75(4):825-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2007.00458.x.

引用本文的文献

1
The Big Five and dark triad personality traits as predictors of emotional labour.作为情绪劳动预测指标的大五人格特质和黑暗三人格特质
Aust J Psychol. 2024 Aug 12;76(1):2389842. doi: 10.1080/00049530.2024.2389842. eCollection 2024.
2
The Role of Personality Traits Toward Organizational Commitments and Service Quality Commitments.人格特质对组织承诺和服务质量承诺的作用。
Front Psychol. 2020 May 15;11:631. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00631. eCollection 2020.
3
The Turkish Adaptation of the Ten-Item Personality Inventory.《十项人格量表的土耳其语改编版》
Noro Psikiyatr Ars. 2013 Dec;50(4):312-319. doi: 10.4274/npa.y6128. Epub 2013 Dec 1.