• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

3 套 4P 问卷的心理计量学评估。

Psychometric evaluation of 3-set 4P questionnaire.

机构信息

School of Health Sciences, Jönköping University, Jönköping, Sweden.

出版信息

Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2013 Feb;29(1):40-7. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2012.06.002. Epub 2012 Jul 24.

DOI:10.1016/j.iccn.2012.06.002
PMID:22835992
Abstract

This is a further development of a specific questionnaire, the 3-set 4P, to be used for measuring former ICU patients' physical and psychosocial problems after intensive care and the need for follow-up. The aim was to psychometrically test and evaluate the 3-set 4P questionnaire in a larger population. The questionnaire consists of three sets: "physical", "psychosocial" and "follow-up". The questionnaires were sent by mail to all patients with more than 24-hour length of stay on four ICUs in Sweden. Construct validity was measured with exploratory factor analysis with Varimax rotation. This resulted in three factors for the "physical set", five factors for the "psychosocial set" and four factors for the "follow-up set" with strong factor loadings and a total explained variance of 62-77.5%. Thirteen questions in the SF-36 were used for concurrent validity showing Spearman's r(s) 0.3-0.6 in eight questions and less than 0.2 in five. Test-retest was used for stability reliability. In set follow-up the correlation was strong to moderate and in physical and psychosocial sets the correlations were moderate to fair. This may have been because the physical and psychosocial status changed rapidly during the test period. All three sets had good homogeneity. In conclusion, the 3-set 4P showed overall acceptable results, but it has to be further modified in different cultures before being considered a fully operational instrument for use in clinical practice.

摘要

这是特定问卷的进一步发展,即 3 组 4P,用于测量重症监护后患者的身体和心理社会问题以及随访需求。目的是在更大的人群中对 3 组 4P 问卷进行心理测量测试和评估。问卷由三部分组成:“身体”、“心理社会”和“随访”。问卷通过邮件发送给瑞典四个 ICU 中住院时间超过 24 小时的所有患者。采用探索性因子分析和 Varimax 旋转进行结构效度测量。这导致“身体组”有三个因素,“心理社会组”有五个因素,“随访组”有四个因素,具有较强的因子负荷和 62-77.5%的总解释方差。使用 SF-36 中的 13 个问题进行同时效度,在 8 个问题中显示 Spearman's r(s) 为 0.3-0.6,在 5 个问题中小于 0.2。测试-重测用于稳定性可靠性。在随访组中,相关性很强到中度,在身体和心理社会组中,相关性为中度到轻度。这可能是因为身体和心理社会状况在测试期间迅速变化。三组的同质性都很好。总之,3 组 4P 总体结果可接受,但在不同文化中需要进一步修改,才能被视为临床实践中完全可用的工具。

相似文献

1
Psychometric evaluation of 3-set 4P questionnaire.3 套 4P 问卷的心理计量学评估。
Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2013 Feb;29(1):40-7. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2012.06.002. Epub 2012 Jul 24.
2
Development of the 3-SET 4P questionnaire for evaluating former ICU patients' physical and psychosocial problems over time: a pilot study.用于评估既往ICU患者随时间推移的身体和心理社会问题的3套4项问卷的开发:一项试点研究
Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2009 Apr;25(2):80-9. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2008.06.004. Epub 2008 Aug 8.
3
Development of the Italian version of the Neck Pain and Disability Scale, NPDS-I: cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity.意大利版颈部疼痛与功能障碍量表(NPDS-I)的研制:跨文化调适、信度与效度
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Jun 1;33(13):E429-34. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318175c2b0.
4
Development of a social inclusion index to capture subjective and objective life domains (Phase II): psychometric development study.发展一个社会包容指数来捕捉主观和客观的生活领域(第二阶段):心理测量发展研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2012;16(1):iii-vii, ix-xii, -1-241. doi: 10.3310/hta16010.
5
Development of a new chewing function questionnaire for assessment of a self-perceived chewing function.开发一种新的咀嚼功能问卷,用于评估自我感知的咀嚼功能。
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2013 Dec;41(6):565-73. doi: 10.1111/cdoe.12048. Epub 2013 Apr 1.
6
[Disease-specific Questionnaire for Quality of Life in Patients with Peripheral Arterial Occlusive Disease in the Stage of Critical Ischemia (FLeQKI)--methodical development of a specific measuring instrument and psychometric evaluation of its validity and reliability (Part 1)].[重症缺血期外周动脉闭塞性疾病患者生活质量疾病特异性问卷(FLeQKI)——一种特定测量工具的方法学开发及其效度和信度的心理测量学评估(第1部分)]
Rofo. 2007 Dec;179(12):1251-7. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-963515. Epub 2007 Nov 14.
7
Craniofacial pain and disability inventory (CF-PDI): development and psychometric validation of a new questionnaire.颅面疼痛与功能障碍量表(CF-PDI):一种新问卷的编制及心理测量学验证
Pain Physician. 2014 Jan-Feb;17(1):95-108.
8
Development of the Italian version of the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI-I): A cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity study.意大利版奥斯威斯利功能障碍指数(ODI-I)的开发:一项跨文化适应、信效度研究
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Sep 1;34(19):2090-5. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181aa1e6b.
9
Development of a psychosocial adaptation questionnaire for Chinese patients with visual impairments.视障患者心理社会适应问卷的编制。
J Clin Nurs. 2011 Oct;20(19-20):2822-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03813.x.
10
Validity and reliability of the modified Chinese version of the Older People's Quality of Life Questionnaire (OPQOL) in older people living alone in China.在中国独居老年人中使用改良后的中文版老年人生活质量问卷(OPQOL)的有效性和可靠性。
Int J Older People Nurs. 2014 Dec;9(4):306-16. doi: 10.1111/opn.12042. Epub 2013 Oct 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Identifying patients' support needs following critical illness: a scoping review of the qualitative literature.确定危重病患者的支持需求:定性文献的范围综述。
Crit Care. 2019 May 24;23(1):187. doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2441-6.
2
A systematic review finds limited data on measurement properties of instruments measuring outcomes in adult intensive care unit survivors.一项系统评价发现,关于测量成年重症监护病房幸存者结局的工具的测量特性的数据有限。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Feb;82:37-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.08.014. Epub 2016 Nov 16.