School of Health Sciences, Jönköping University, Jönköping, Sweden.
Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2013 Feb;29(1):40-7. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2012.06.002. Epub 2012 Jul 24.
This is a further development of a specific questionnaire, the 3-set 4P, to be used for measuring former ICU patients' physical and psychosocial problems after intensive care and the need for follow-up. The aim was to psychometrically test and evaluate the 3-set 4P questionnaire in a larger population. The questionnaire consists of three sets: "physical", "psychosocial" and "follow-up". The questionnaires were sent by mail to all patients with more than 24-hour length of stay on four ICUs in Sweden. Construct validity was measured with exploratory factor analysis with Varimax rotation. This resulted in three factors for the "physical set", five factors for the "psychosocial set" and four factors for the "follow-up set" with strong factor loadings and a total explained variance of 62-77.5%. Thirteen questions in the SF-36 were used for concurrent validity showing Spearman's r(s) 0.3-0.6 in eight questions and less than 0.2 in five. Test-retest was used for stability reliability. In set follow-up the correlation was strong to moderate and in physical and psychosocial sets the correlations were moderate to fair. This may have been because the physical and psychosocial status changed rapidly during the test period. All three sets had good homogeneity. In conclusion, the 3-set 4P showed overall acceptable results, but it has to be further modified in different cultures before being considered a fully operational instrument for use in clinical practice.
这是特定问卷的进一步发展,即 3 组 4P,用于测量重症监护后患者的身体和心理社会问题以及随访需求。目的是在更大的人群中对 3 组 4P 问卷进行心理测量测试和评估。问卷由三部分组成:“身体”、“心理社会”和“随访”。问卷通过邮件发送给瑞典四个 ICU 中住院时间超过 24 小时的所有患者。采用探索性因子分析和 Varimax 旋转进行结构效度测量。这导致“身体组”有三个因素,“心理社会组”有五个因素,“随访组”有四个因素,具有较强的因子负荷和 62-77.5%的总解释方差。使用 SF-36 中的 13 个问题进行同时效度,在 8 个问题中显示 Spearman's r(s) 为 0.3-0.6,在 5 个问题中小于 0.2。测试-重测用于稳定性可靠性。在随访组中,相关性很强到中度,在身体和心理社会组中,相关性为中度到轻度。这可能是因为身体和心理社会状况在测试期间迅速变化。三组的同质性都很好。总之,3 组 4P 总体结果可接受,但在不同文化中需要进一步修改,才能被视为临床实践中完全可用的工具。