• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对 2204 例汶川地震腹部钝性创伤患者进行超声筛查。

Screening ultrasonography of 2,204 patients with blunt abdominal trauma in the Wenchuan earthquake.

机构信息

Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China.

出版信息

J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012 Oct;73(4):890-4. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318256dfe1.

DOI:10.1097/TA.0b013e318256dfe1
PMID:22835997
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Abdominal injuries constitute a small proportion of all earthquake-related traumas; however, it often resulted in fatal hemorrhage. Ultrasonography has been described as an effective triage tool in the evaluation of blunt abdominal trauma. We aimed to present an overview of the diagnostic accuracy of screening ultrasonography for patients with blunt abdominal trauma admitted to various hospitals during the Wenchuan earthquake in China.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the patients with blunt abdominal trauma who underwent ultrasonography after admission to various hospitals. Ultrasonography findings were considered positive if evidence of free fluid or a parenchymal injury was identified. Ultrasonography findings were compared with the findings of computed tomography, diagnostic peritoneal lavage, repeated ultrasonography, cystography, operation, and/or the clinical course.

RESULTS

Findings from 2,204 ultrasonographic examinations were evaluated. Findings of 199 ultrasonographic examinations (9.0%) were considered positive. Of the patients, 12 (0.5%) had a false-negative ultrasonographic findings; of this group, 3 (25%) required exploratory laparotomy. Ultrasonography had a sensitivity of 91.9%, specificity of 96.9%, and an accuracy of 96.6% for detection of abdominal injuries. Positive predictive value was 68.3%, and negative predictive value was 99.4%.

CONCLUSION

Screening ultrasonography is highly reliable in the setting of blunt abdominal trauma after earthquake. It should be used as an initial diagnostic modality in the evaluation of most blunt abdominal trauma.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic study, level III.

摘要

背景

腹部损伤在所有与地震相关的创伤中所占比例较小,但往往导致致命性出血。超声检查已被描述为评估钝性腹部创伤的有效分诊工具。我们旨在介绍中国汶川地震期间各医院收治的钝性腹部创伤患者的超声筛查诊断准确性概述。

方法

我们回顾性分析了各医院收治的钝性腹部创伤患者。如果发现游离液体或实质损伤,则认为超声检查结果阳性。将超声检查结果与计算机断层扫描、诊断性腹腔灌洗、重复超声检查、膀胱造影、手术和/或临床过程进行比较。

结果

共评估了 2204 次超声检查的结果。199 次超声检查(9.0%)结果阳性。在这些患者中,有 12 例(0.5%)超声检查结果为假阴性;其中 3 例(25%)需要剖腹探查。超声检查对腹部损伤的敏感性为 91.9%,特异性为 96.9%,准确性为 96.6%。阳性预测值为 68.3%,阴性预测值为 99.4%。

结论

地震后,超声筛查在钝性腹部创伤中具有高度可靠性。它应作为评估大多数钝性腹部创伤的初始诊断方法。

证据水平

诊断研究,III 级。

相似文献

1
Screening ultrasonography of 2,204 patients with blunt abdominal trauma in the Wenchuan earthquake.对 2204 例汶川地震腹部钝性创伤患者进行超声筛查。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012 Oct;73(4):890-4. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318256dfe1.
2
Diagnostic value of ultrasonography in the evaluation of blunt abdominal trauma.超声检查在钝性腹部创伤评估中的诊断价值
Diagn Interv Radiol. 2005 Mar;11(1):41-4.
3
Blunt abdominal trauma: screening us in 2,693 patients.钝性腹部创伤:对2693例患者进行超声筛查。
Radiology. 2001 Feb;218(2):352-8. doi: 10.1148/radiology.218.2.r01fe42352.
4
Hypotensive patients with blunt abdominal trauma: performance of screening US.腹部钝性创伤的低血压患者:超声筛查的表现
Radiology. 2005 May;235(2):436-43. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2352040583. Epub 2005 Mar 29.
5
FAST scan: is it worth doing in hemodynamically stable blunt trauma patients?快速扫描:在血流动力学稳定的钝性创伤患者中是否值得进行?
Surgery. 2010 Oct;148(4):695-700; discussion 700-1. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2010.07.032. Epub 2010 Aug 30.
6
Importance of evaluating organ parenchyma during screening abdominal ultrasonography after blunt trauma.钝性创伤后腹部超声筛查期间评估器官实质的重要性。
J Ultrasound Med. 2001 Jun;20(6):577-83; quiz 585. doi: 10.7863/jum.2001.20.6.577.
7
Blunt abdominal trauma: clinical value of negative screening US scans.钝性腹部创伤:超声筛查阴性的临床价值
Radiology. 2004 Mar;230(3):661-8. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2303021707.
8
Role of ultrasonography, computed tomography and diagnostic peritoneal lavage in abdominal blunt trauma.超声检查、计算机断层扫描及诊断性腹腔灌洗在腹部钝性创伤中的作用
Saudi Med J. 2002 Nov;23(11):1350-5.
9
Detection of significant bowel and mesenteric injuries in blunt abdominal trauma with 64-slice computed tomography.64 层螺旋 CT 检测钝性腹部创伤中的显著性肠和肠系膜损伤。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013 Apr;74(4):1081-6. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182827178.
10
Not so FAST.没那么快。
J Trauma. 2003 Jan;54(1):52-9; discussion 59-60. doi: 10.1097/00005373-200301000-00007.

引用本文的文献

1
Destructive disasters, trauma, crush syndrome, and beyond.破坏性灾害、创伤、挤压综合征等等。
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2023 Nov;57(6):305-314. doi: 10.5152/j.aott.2023.23147.
2
Traumatic hemorrhage and chain of survival.创伤性出血与生存链。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2023 May 24;31(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s13049-023-01088-8.
3
Duodeno-pancreatic and extrahepatic biliary tree trauma: WSES-AAST guidelines.十二指肠-胰腺和肝外胆道树创伤:WSES-AAST 指南。
World J Emerg Surg. 2019 Dec 11;14:56. doi: 10.1186/s13017-019-0278-6. eCollection 2019.
4
Point-of-care ultrasonography for diagnosing thoracoabdominal injuries in patients with blunt trauma.床旁超声检查在钝性创伤患者胸腹部损伤诊断中的应用
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Dec 12;12(12):CD012669. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012669.pub2.
5
Clinically Unjustified Diagnostic Imaging - a Worrisome Tendency in Today's Medical Practice.临床不合理的诊断性影像学检查——当今医疗实践中令人担忧的趋势。
Pol J Radiol. 2016 Jul 13;81:325-30. doi: 10.12659/PJR.896847. eCollection 2016.