Dacus J V, Schulz K, Sibai B M, Gonzalez-Ruiz A
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tennessee, Memphis.
J Reprod Med. 1990 Dec;35(12):1150-2.
The substitution of capillary reflectance meter glucose values for plasma or serum glucose values would be practical and cost saving. A direct comparison was performed of simultaneous capillary reflectance meter and plasma glucose values in routine screening and oral glucose tolerance testing in a pregnant population. The use of capillary glucose in 50-g glucola screening had a sensitivity of 82.6% and specificity of 98.1% as compared to the standard plasma method. Even though our data demonstrate a good correlation (r = 0.897) between capillary and plasma glucose values, our results do not support the direct substitution of plasma glucose values with capillary reflectance meter glucose values in screening for or diagnosing glucose intolerance in an obstetric population.
用毛细血管反射仪测得的血糖值替代血浆或血清血糖值既实用又节省成本。在对孕妇群体进行常规筛查和口服葡萄糖耐量试验时,对同时使用毛细血管反射仪测得的血糖值和血浆血糖值进行了直接比较。与标准血浆法相比,在50克葡萄糖筛查中使用毛细血管血糖的灵敏度为82.6%,特异性为98.1%。尽管我们的数据表明毛细血管血糖值与血浆血糖值之间具有良好的相关性(r = 0.897),但我们的结果并不支持在产科人群中筛查或诊断糖耐量异常时直接用毛细血管反射仪测得的血糖值替代血浆血糖值。