MedStar Health Research Institute, Hyattsville, MD 20782, USA.
Am J Kidney Dis. 2012 Nov;60(5):795-803. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2012.06.015. Epub 2012 Jul 25.
In populations with high prevalences of diabetes and obesity, estimating glomerular filtration rate (GFR) by using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation may predict cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk better than by using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Study equation.
Longitudinal cohort study comparing the association of GFR estimated using either the CKD-EPI or MDRD Study equation with incident CVD outcomes.
SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: American Indians participating in the Strong Heart Study, a longitudinal population-based cohort with high prevalences of diabetes, CVD, and CKD.
Estimated GFR (eGFR) predicted using the CKD-EPI and MDRD Study equations.
Fatal and nonfatal cardiovascular events, consisting of coronary heart disease, stroke, and heart failure.
The association between eGFR and outcomes was explored in Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for traditional risk factors and albuminuria; the net reclassification index and integrated discrimination improvement were determined for the CKD-EPI versus MDRD Study equations.
In 4,549 participants, diabetes was present in 45%; CVD, in 7%; and stages 3-5 CKD, in 10%. During a median of 15 years, there were 1,280 cases of incident CVD, 929 cases of incident coronary heart disease, 305 cases of incident stroke, and 381 cases of incident heart failure. Reduced eGFR (<90 mL/min/1.73 m2) was associated with adverse events in most models. Compared with the MDRD Study equation, the CKD-EPI equation correctly reclassified 17.0% of 2,151 participants without incident CVD to a lower risk (higher eGFR) category and 1.3% (n=28) were reclassified incorrectly to a higher risk (lower eGFR) category.
Single measurements of eGFR and albuminuria at study visits.
Although eGFR based on either equation had similar associations with incident CVD, coronary heart disease, stroke, and heart failure events, in those not having events, reclassification of participants to eGFR categories was superior using the CKD-EPI equation compared with the MDRD Study equation.
在糖尿病和肥胖症患病率较高的人群中,使用慢性肾脏病流行病学合作(CKD-EPI)方程估算肾小球滤过率(GFR)可能比使用肾脏病饮食改良研究(MDRD)方程更好地预测心血管疾病(CVD)风险。
比较使用 CKD-EPI 或 MDRD 研究方程估算的 GFR 与 CVD 事件发生率之间关联的纵向队列研究。
参加“强壮心脏研究”的美国印第安人,这是一个基于人群的纵向队列,糖尿病、CVD 和 CKD 的患病率较高。
使用 CKD-EPI 和 MDRD 研究方程预测的估计肾小球滤过率(eGFR)。
在 4549 名参与者中,45%患有糖尿病,7%患有 CVD,10%患有 3-5 期 CKD。在中位 15 年的随访期间,有 1280 例 CVD 事件、929 例冠心病事件、305 例卒中事件和 381 例心力衰竭事件。在大多数模型中,eGFR 降低(<90 mL/min/1.73 m2)与不良事件相关。与 MDRD 研究方程相比,CKD-EPI 方程正确地将 2151 名无 CVD 事件参与者中的 17.0%重新分类为风险较低(较高 eGFR)类别,而 1.3%(n=28)被错误地重新分类为风险较高(较低 eGFR)类别。
研究就诊时单次测量 eGFR 和白蛋白尿。
尽管基于两种方程的 eGFR 与 CVD、冠心病、卒中和心力衰竭事件的发生率均有相似的关联,但在无事件发生的情况下,与 MDRD 研究方程相比,使用 CKD-EPI 方程对参与者进行 eGFR 分类的重新分类效果更好。