Suppr超能文献

描述纯音频率差阈限随频率、时长和强度的变化关系。

Characterizing the dependence of pure-tone frequency difference limens on frequency, duration, and level.

机构信息

Auditory Perception and Cognition Laboratory, Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.

出版信息

Hear Res. 2012 Oct;292(1-2):1-13. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2012.07.004. Epub 2012 Jul 25.

Abstract

This study examined the relationship between the difference limen for frequency (DLF) of pure tones and three commonly explored stimulus parameters of frequency, duration, and sensation level. Data from 12 published studies of pure-tone frequency discrimination (a total of 583 DLF measurements across 77 normal-hearing listeners) were analyzed using hierarchical (or "mixed-effects") generalized linear models. Model parameters were estimated using two approaches (Bayesian and maximum likelihood). A model in which log-transformed DLFs were predicted using a sum of power-law functions plus a random subject- or group-specific term was found to explain a substantial proportion of the variability in the psychophysical data. The results confirmed earlier findings of an inverse-square-root relationship between log-transformed DLFs and duration, and of an inverse relationship between log(DLF) and sensation level. However, they did not confirm earlier suggestions that log(DLF) increases approximately linearly with the square-root of frequency; instead, the relationship between frequency and log(DLF) was best fitted using a power function of frequency with an exponent of about 0.8. These results, and the comprehensive quantitative analysis of pure-tone frequency discrimination on which they are based, provide a new reference for the quantitative evaluation of models of frequency (or pitch) discrimination.

摘要

本研究考察了纯音频率差阈(DLF)与频率、时长和感觉水平这三个常见的刺激参数之间的关系。使用分层(或“混合效应”)广义线性模型对来自 12 项纯音频率辨别研究的数据(来自 77 名正常听力者的总共 583 个 DLF 测量值)进行了分析。使用两种方法(贝叶斯和最大似然)估计模型参数。发现一个模型,其中对数转换后的 DLF 可以通过幂律函数之和加上随机个体或群体特定项来预测,该模型可以解释心理物理数据中相当大比例的变异性。结果证实了先前发现的对数转换后的 DLF 与时长之间的反比例平方根关系,以及对数(DLF)与感觉水平之间的反比例关系。然而,它们并没有证实先前关于对数(DLF)随频率的平方根大致呈线性增加的建议;相反,频率和对数(DLF)之间的关系最好通过频率的幂函数来拟合,其指数约为 0.8。这些结果以及基于它们的纯音频率辨别综合定量分析,为频率(或音高)辨别模型的定量评估提供了新的参考。

相似文献

6
Frequency discrimination thresholds: the effect of increment versus decrement detection of frequency.
J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol. 2004;15(1-2):29-40. doi: 10.1515/jbcpp.2004.15.1-2.29.

引用本文的文献

4
Detection of pitch errors in well-known songs.知名歌曲中音调错误的检测。
Psychol Music. 2023 Jan;51(1):172-187. doi: 10.1177/03057356221087447. Epub 2022 May 9.
6
An Active Sensing Paradigm for Studying Human Auditory Perception.一种用于研究人类听觉感知的主动传感范式。
Front Integr Neurosci. 2022 May 18;16:892951. doi: 10.3389/fnint.2022.892951. eCollection 2022.
9
Mathematical framework for place coding in the auditory system.听觉系统中位置编码的数学框架。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2021 Aug 2;17(8):e1009251. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009251. eCollection 2021 Aug.

本文引用的文献

7
Evaluating auditory performance limits: II. One-parameter discrimination with random-level variation.
Neural Comput. 2001 Oct;13(10):2317-38. doi: 10.1162/089976601750541813.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验