Oral Radiology, Department of Dentistry, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2013;42(1):39458105. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/39458105. Epub 2012 Jul 27.
The aim of this study was to compare cone beam CT (CBCT) in a small field of view (FOV) with a solid-state sensor and a photostimulable phosphor plate system for detection of cavitated approximal surfaces.
257 non-filled approximal surfaces from human permanent premolars and molars were recorded by two intraoral digital receptors, a storage phosphor plate (Digora Optime, Soredex) and a solid-state CMOS sensor (Digora Toto, Soredex), and scanned in a cone beam CT unit (3D Accuitomo FPD80, Morita) with a FOV of 4 cm and a voxel size of 0.08 mm. Image sections were carried out in the axial and mesiodistal tooth planes. Six observers recorded surface cavitation in all images. Validation of the true absence or presence of surface cavitation was performed by inspecting the surfaces under strong light with the naked eye. Differences in sensitivity, specificity and agreement were estimated by analysing the binary data in a generalized linear model using an identity link function.
A significantly higher sensitivity was obtained by all observers with CBCT (p < 0.001), which was not compromised by a lower specificity. Therefore, a significantly higher overall agreement was obtained with CBCT (p < 0.001). There were no significant differences between the Digora Optime phosphor plate system and the Digora Toto CMOS sensor for any parameter.
CBCT was much more accurate in the detection of surface cavitation in approximal surfaces than intraoral receptors. The differences are interpreted as clinically significant. A CBCT examination performed for other reasons should also be assessed for approximal surface cavities in teeth without restorations.
本研究旨在比较小视野锥形束 CT(CBCT)与固态传感器和光激励磷光体板系统在检测近中面龋损方面的性能。
从 257 个人类恒前磨牙和磨牙的非填充近中面记录了两种口腔内数字接收器的数据,分别是存储磷光体板(Digora Optime,Soredex)和固态 CMOS 传感器(Digora Toto,Soredex),并在锥形束 CT 单元(3D Accuitomo FPD80,Morita)中以 4cm 的视野和 0.08mm 的体素大小进行扫描。图像切片在轴向和近远中牙平面进行。六名观察者在所有图像中记录表面空化。通过用肉眼在强光下检查表面,对表面空化的真实存在或不存在进行验证。通过在广义线性模型中使用恒等链接函数分析二元数据来估计敏感性、特异性和一致性的差异。
所有观察者使用 CBCT 时获得的敏感性明显更高(p <0.001),特异性没有降低。因此,使用 CBCT 获得的总体一致性明显更高(p <0.001)。对于任何参数,Digora Optime 磷光体板系统和 Digora Toto CMOS 传感器之间均无显著差异。
与口腔内接收器相比,CBCT 更准确地检测近中面的表面空化。这些差异被解释为具有临床意义。对于其他原因进行的 CBCT 检查也应该评估无修复体牙齿的近中面龋腔。