Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 601 N Caroline St, JHOC 5165, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.
Radiology. 2012 Oct;265(1):254-9. doi: 10.1148/radiol.12112640. Epub 2012 Jul 27.
To prospectively assess overlay technology in providing accurate and efficient targeting for magnetic resonance (MR) imaging-guided shoulder and hip joint arthrography.
A prototype augmented reality image overlay system was used in conjunction with a clinical 1.5-T MR imager. A total of 24 shoulder joint and 24 hip joint injections were planned in 12 human cadavers. Two operators (A and B) participated, each performing procedures on different cadavers using image overlay guidance. MR imaging was used to confirm needle positions, monitor injections, and perform MR arthrography. Accuracy was assessed according to the rate of needle adjustment, target error, and whether the injection was intraarticular. Efficiency was assessed according to arthrography procedural time. Operator differences were assessed with comparison of accuracy and procedure times between the operators. Mann-Whitney U test and Fisher exact test were used to assess group differences.
Forty-five arthrography procedures (23 shoulders, 22 hips) were performed. Three joints had prostheses and were excluded. Operator A performed 12 shoulder and 12 hip injections. Operator B performed 11 shoulder and 10 hip injections. Needle adjustment rate was 13% (six of 45; one for operator A and five for operator B). Target error was 3.1 mm±1.2 (standard deviation) (operator A, 2.9 mm±1.4; operator B, 3.5 mm±0.9). Intraarticular injection rate was 100% (45 of 45). The average arthrography time was 14 minutes (range, 6-27 minutes; 12 minutes [range, 6-25 minutes] for operator A and 16 minutes [range, 6-27 min] for operator B). Operator differences were not significant with regard to needle adjustment rate (P=.08), target error (P=.07), intraarticular injection rate (P>.99), and arthrography time (P=.22).
Image overlay technology provides accurate and efficient MR guidance for successful shoulder and hip arthrography in human cadavers.
前瞻性评估叠加技术在磁共振(MR)成像引导的肩和髋关节关节造影中实现准确和高效靶向的能力。
使用原型增强现实图像叠加系统与临床 1.5-T MR 成像仪配合使用。在 12 具人体尸体中计划进行 24 次肩关节和 24 次髋关节注射。两名操作员(A 和 B)参与,每位操作员使用图像叠加引导分别在不同的尸体上进行操作。MR 成像用于确认针的位置、监测注射过程和进行 MR 关节造影。根据针的调整率、目标误差和注射是否进入关节腔来评估准确性。根据关节造影程序时间来评估效率。通过操作员之间的准确性和程序时间比较来评估操作员差异。使用 Mann-Whitney U 检验和 Fisher 确切检验评估组间差异。
共进行了 45 次关节造影术(23 个肩部,22 个髋关节)。有 3 个关节有假体,被排除在外。操作员 A 进行了 12 次肩部和 12 次髋关节注射。操作员 B 进行了 11 次肩部和 10 次髋关节注射。针的调整率为 13%(45 次中的 6 次;操作员 A 1 次,操作员 B 5 次)。目标误差为 3.1mm±1.2(标准差)(操作员 A,2.9mm±1.4;操作员 B,3.5mm±0.9)。关节内注射率为 100%(45 次中的 45 次)。平均关节造影时间为 14 分钟(范围,6-27 分钟;操作员 A 为 12 分钟[范围,6-25 分钟],操作员 B 为 16 分钟[范围,6-27 分钟])。在针的调整率(P=.08)、目标误差(P=.07)、关节内注射率(P>.99)和关节造影时间(P=.22)方面,操作员之间的差异无统计学意义。
图像叠加技术为人体尸体的成功肩和髋关节关节造影提供了准确和高效的 MR 引导。