Magaji S A, Singh H P, Pandey R K
University Hospital of Leicester NHS Trust, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester LE3 9QP, UK.
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012 Aug;94(8):1086-9. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.94B8.29001.
A total of 92 patients with symptoms for over six months due to subacromial impingement of the shoulder, who were being treated with physiotherapy, were included in this study. While continuing with physiotherapy they waited a further six months for surgery. They were divided into three groups based on the following four clinical and radiological criteria: temporary benefit following steroid injection, pain in the mid-arc of abduction, a consistently positive Hawkins test and radiological evidence of impingement. Group A fulfilled all four criteria, group B three criteria and group C two criteria. A total of nine patients improved while waiting for surgery and were excluded, leaving 83 who underwent arthroscopic subacromial decompression (SAD). The new Oxford shoulder score was recorded pre-operatively and at three and 12 months post-operatively. A total of 51 patients (group A) had a significant improvement in the mean shoulder score from 18 (13 to 22) pre-operatively to 38 (35 to 42) at three months (p < 0.001). The mean score in this group was significantly better than in group B (21 patients) and C (11 patients) at this time. At one year patients in all groups showed improvement in scores, but patients in group A had a higher mean score (p = 0.01). At one year patients in groups A and B did better than those in group C (p = 0.01). Arthroscopic SAD is a beneficial intervention in selected patients. The four criteria could help identify patients in whom it is likely to be most effective.
本研究纳入了92例因肩部肩峰下撞击综合征出现症状超过6个月且正在接受物理治疗的患者。在继续进行物理治疗的同时,他们等待了6个月才接受手术。根据以下四项临床和影像学标准将他们分为三组:类固醇注射后有暂时改善、外展中弧疼痛、Hawkins试验持续阳性以及有撞击的影像学证据。A组符合所有四项标准,B组符合三项标准,C组符合两项标准。共有9例患者在等待手术期间病情改善,被排除在外,剩下83例接受了关节镜下肩峰下减压术(SAD)。术前及术后3个月和12个月记录新的牛津肩部评分。共有51例患者(A组)的平均肩部评分从术前的18分(13至22分)显著提高到术后3个月的38分(35至42分)(p<0.001)。此时,该组的平均评分显著高于B组(21例患者)和C组(11例患者)。在1年时,所有组的患者评分均有改善,但A组患者的平均评分更高(p = 0.01)。在1年时,A组和B组的患者比C组的患者情况更好(p = 0.01)。关节镜下SAD对选定患者是一种有益的干预措施。这四项标准有助于识别可能最有效的患者。