Watts Amy R, Williams Ben, Kim Susan W, Bramwell Donald C, Krishnan Jeganath
Department of Orthopaedics, School of Medicine, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia.
International Musculoskeletal Research Institute, Adelaide, Australia.
Shoulder Elbow. 2017 Jan;9(1):31-41. doi: 10.1177/1758573216663201. Epub 2016 Aug 20.
Shoulder impingement syndrome (SIS) is a common diagnosis for patients with pain and dysfunction of the shoulder. Variations in the signs and symptoms might lead to uncertainty regarding the definition of SIS. The aim of this review is to explore the participant selection criteria used in the literature when investigating SIS and to assess differences in criteria among treating professions.
This is a PRISMA systematic review of publications from 2009 to 2014 from MEDLINE, PubMed, The Cochrane Library, Embase, Scopus and CINAHL.
Ninety-seven articles met inclusion criteria for this review. Twenty-five different surgical and nonsurgical treatments were investigated. Impingement-specific index tests were used in all studies. Exclusion index tests were used in 62% of studies. Twenty index tests were identified. Radiological investigations were reported in 53% of all studies, of which a further 53% reported using two or more radiological investigations.
This systematic review has illustrated that studies investigating SIS test for various signs and symptoms, which is in keeping with describing the condition as a 'syndrome'. However, there are inconsistencies in participant selection criteria between health disciplines, highlighting a need for harmonization of the selection criteria in the form of an international editorial consensus.
肩峰撞击综合征(SIS)是肩部疼痛和功能障碍患者的常见诊断。体征和症状的差异可能导致对SIS定义的不确定性。本综述的目的是探讨文献中在研究SIS时使用的参与者选择标准,并评估不同治疗专业之间标准的差异。
这是一项对2009年至2014年来自MEDLINE、PubMed、Cochrane图书馆、Embase、Scopus和CINAHL的出版物进行的PRISMA系统综述。
97篇文章符合本综述的纳入标准。研究了25种不同的手术和非手术治疗方法。所有研究均使用了特定于撞击的指标测试。62%的研究使用了排除指标测试。确定了20项指标测试。53%的所有研究报告了影像学检查,其中进一步有53%报告使用了两种或更多种影像学检查。
本系统综述表明,研究SIS的研究针对各种体征和症状进行测试,这与将该病症描述为“综合征”相一致。然而,不同健康学科之间在参与者选择标准上存在不一致,突出表明需要以国际编辑共识的形式统一选择标准。