Telethon Institute for Child Health Research, Centre for Child Health Research, University of Western Australia, Subiaco, Western Australia, Australia.
PLoS One. 2013 Apr 16;8(4):e61699. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0061699. Print 2013.
Mothers delivering as private patients in Australia have a high rate of assisted deliveries, which could lead to adverse infant outcomes in this group of patients. We investigated whether the risk of adverse infant outcomes after assisted deliveries was different for mothers admitted as public or private patients for delivery, when compared with unassisted deliveries.
We included 158,241 vaginal, singleton, term birth admissions in our study where the infant was live born and without birth defects. The study population was identified from statutory birth and hospital data collections held by the Western Australian (WA) Department of Health. We estimated odds ratios and confidence intervals using logistic regression models adjusted for a range of maternal demographic, pregnancy and birth characteristics. Interaction was assessed by including interaction terms in the models. Outcomes included low Apgar scores at five minutes (< 7), neonatal resuscitation and special care admission. Mothers delivering as private patients had an increased risk of assisted vaginal delivery compared with public patients (adjusted OR 1.74, 95% CI = 1.68-1.80). Compared with unassisted vaginal deliveries, assisted deliveries were associated with increased risk of Apgar scores at five minutes below 7 (OR 1.25, 1.08-1.45), neonatal resuscitation (OR = 1.69, 1.42-2.00) and admission to special care nursery (OR = 1.64, 1.53-1.76). The increased risk of neonatal resuscitation was higher for mothers admitted as private patients for delivery (OR = 2.13) than public patients (OR = 1 .55, p(interaction) = 0.03).
Our results suggested that the high risk of neonatal resuscitation following assisted vaginal deliveries compared to unassisted is higher in private patients than public patients. Whether this phenomenon is due to the twofold higher rate of assisted vaginal deliveries in this group of patients or a higher rate of fetal indications for assisted vaginal delivery remains to be answered.
在澳大利亚,选择私人病房分娩的产妇中,辅助分娩的比例较高,这可能导致该人群的婴儿出现不良结局。我们调查了与未经辅助的分娩相比,选择私人病房分娩的产妇与选择公共病房分娩的产妇在接受辅助分娩后,婴儿不良结局的风险是否不同。
我们的研究纳入了 158241 例阴道分娩、单胎、足月分娩的住院分娩病例,这些婴儿均为活产且无出生缺陷。该研究人群是从西澳大利亚州(WA)卫生部管理的法定分娩和医院数据收集库中确定的。我们使用逻辑回归模型估计了比值比和置信区间,并对一系列产妇人口统计学、妊娠和分娩特征进行了调整。通过在模型中纳入交互项来评估交互作用。结局包括 5 分钟时 Apgar 评分较低(<7)、新生儿复苏和重症监护病房入院。与公共病房的产妇相比,选择私人病房分娩的产妇接受辅助阴道分娩的风险更高(调整后的比值比 1.74,95%置信区间 1.68-1.80)。与未经辅助的阴道分娩相比,辅助阴道分娩与 5 分钟时 Apgar 评分低于 7 的风险增加相关(比值比 1.25,1.08-1.45)、新生儿复苏(比值比 1.69,1.42-2.00)和重症监护病房入院(比值比 1.64,1.53-1.76)。与公共病房的产妇相比,选择私人病房分娩的产妇新生儿复苏的风险更高(比值比 2.13),而公共病房的产妇则更低(比值比 1.55,p(交互)=0.03)。
我们的研究结果表明,与未经辅助的阴道分娩相比,辅助阴道分娩后新生儿复苏的风险较高,而在私人病房的产妇中这一风险比公共病房的产妇更高。这种现象是由于该人群中辅助阴道分娩的比例较高,还是由于辅助阴道分娩的胎儿指征较高,仍有待回答。