• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

国家多学科处方教育方法的效果。

Effectiveness of a national approach to prescribing education for multiple disciplines.

机构信息

NPS: MedicineWise, Surry Hills, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2013 Mar;75(3):756-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2012.04399.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2125.2012.04399.x
PMID:22844974
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3575941/
Abstract

AIMS

To evaluate the effectiveness of a national approach to prescribing education on health professional students' prescribing and therapeutics knowledge, across multiple disciplines.

METHODS

In a university examination setting, 83 medical, 40 pharmacy and 13 nurse practitioner students from three different universities completed a set of multiple choice questions (MCQs) before and after completing an online module from the National Prescribing Curriculum (NPC). To minimize overestimation of knowledge, students had to indicate the level of certainty for each answer on a three-point scale. MCQs were scored using a validated certainty-based marking scheme resulting in a composite score (maximum 30 and minimum -60). Students were asked to rate their perception of usefulness of the module.

RESULTS

At the pre-module phase, there were no significant differences in the composite MCQ scores between the medical (9.0 ± 10.3), pharmacy (10.2 ± 10.6) and nurse practitioner (8.0 ± 10.7) students. The scores improved significantly for all groups at the post-module phase (P < 0.01 for all groups) by similar extents (post-module results: medical, 14.5 ± 9.6; pharmacy, 14.4 ± 9.9; nurse practitioner, 12.1 ± 9.6). 39.4% of the MCQs answered incorrectly with high level of certainty at the pre-module phase were still answered incorrectly with high level of certainty at the post-module phase. Almost all students (with no significant difference between the groups) found the NPC modules, post-module MCQs and feedback useful as a learning tool.

CONCLUSIONS

A national online approach to prescribing education can improve therapeutics knowledge of students from multiple disciplines of health care and contribute towards streamlining interdisciplinary learning in medication management.

摘要

目的

评估国家规定的处方教育方法对医学生、药剂师和护士从业者的处方和治疗知识的有效性,涉及多个学科。

方法

在大学考试环境中,来自三所不同大学的 83 名医学生、40 名药剂师和 13 名护士从业者在完成国家处方课程(NPC)的在线模块前后完成了一组多项选择题(MCQ)。为了最小化知识的高估,学生必须在三点量表上为每个答案表示确定性水平。MCQ 使用经过验证的基于确定性的评分方案进行评分,得出综合分数(最高 30 分,最低-60 分)。学生被要求对模块的有用性进行评分。

结果

在模块前阶段,医学生(9.0±10.3)、药剂师(10.2±10.6)和护士从业者(8.0±10.7)的综合 MCQ 分数之间没有显著差异。所有组在模块后阶段的分数都显著提高(所有组 P<0.01),提高幅度相似(模块后结果:医学生,14.5±9.6;药剂师,14.4±9.9;护士从业者,12.1±9.6)。在模块前阶段有 39.4%的 MCQ 回答错误且具有高度确定性,在模块后阶段仍以高度确定性回答错误。几乎所有的学生(各组之间没有显著差异)都认为 NPC 模块、模块后的 MCQ 和反馈作为学习工具很有用。

结论

国家在线处方教育方法可以提高来自多个医疗保健学科的学生的治疗知识水平,并有助于简化药物管理方面的跨学科学习。

相似文献

1
Effectiveness of a national approach to prescribing education for multiple disciplines.国家多学科处方教育方法的效果。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2013 Mar;75(3):756-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2012.04399.x.
2
Impact of online toxicology training on health professionals: the Global Educational Toxicology Uniting Project (GETUP).在线毒理学培训对卫生专业人员的影响:全球毒理学教育联合项目(GETUP)
Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2017 Nov;55(9):981-985. doi: 10.1080/15563650.2017.1330480. Epub 2017 Jun 15.
3
Certainty rating in pre-and post-tests of study modules in an online clinical pharmacy course - A pilot study to evaluate teaching and learning.在线临床药学课程中学习模块的课前和课后测试的确定性评级——一项评估教学与学习的试点研究
BMC Med Educ. 2016 Oct 14;16(1):267. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0783-1.
4
An interprofessional pediatric prescribing workshop.跨专业儿科处方工作坊。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2012 Aug 10;76(6):111. doi: 10.5688/ajpe766111.
5
Healthcare professional students' knowledge of drug-drug interactions.医学生对药物相互作用的了解。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2011 Dec 15;75(10):199. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7510199.
6
Inter-professional prescribing masterclass for medical students and non-medical prescribing students (nurses and pharmacists): a pilot study.面向医学生和非医学处方开具专业学生(护士和药剂师)的跨专业处方开具大师班:一项试点研究。
Scott Med J. 2015 Nov;60(4):202-7. doi: 10.1177/0036933015606583. Epub 2015 Sep 23.
7
Comparison of the problem based learning-driven with the traditional didactic-lecture-based curricula.基于问题的学习驱动课程与传统讲授式课程的比较。
Int J Med Educ. 2016 Jun 12;7:181-7. doi: 10.5116/ijme.5749.80f5.
8
A computer-based module for prescribing error instruction.基于计算机的医嘱错误指导模块。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2009 Oct 1;73(6):101. doi: 10.5688/aj7306101.
9
Improving prescribing practices: A pharmacist-led educational intervention for nurse practitioner students.改善处方实践:一项由药剂师主导的针对执业护士学生的教育干预措施。
J Am Assoc Nurse Pract. 2017 May;29(5):248-254. doi: 10.1002/2327-6924.12446. Epub 2017 Feb 18.
10
Multiprofessional learning: the attitudes of medical, nursing and pharmacy students to shared learning.多专业学习:医学、护理和药学专业学生对共享学习的态度。
Med Educ. 2001 Sep;35(9):876-83. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2001.00959.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Nurse practitioner and midwife antibiotic prescribing in Australia.澳大利亚执业护士和助产士的抗生素处方情况。
Eur J Midwifery. 2023 May 26;7:11. doi: 10.18332/ejm/162439. eCollection 2023.
2
Teaching rational prescribing in undergraduate medical education: a systematic search and review.本科医学教育中的合理处方教学:系统检索与综述
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2023 Mar;79(3):341-348. doi: 10.1007/s00228-022-03448-2. Epub 2023 Jan 9.
3
Certainty-based marking in a formative assessment improves student course appreciation but not summative examination scores.基于确定性的形成性评估标记提高了学生对课程的欣赏度,但对总结性考试成绩没有影响。
BMC Med Educ. 2019 May 31;19(1):178. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1610-2.
4
Certainty rating in pre-and post-tests of study modules in an online clinical pharmacy course - A pilot study to evaluate teaching and learning.在线临床药学课程中学习模块的课前和课后测试的确定性评级——一项评估教学与学习的试点研究
BMC Med Educ. 2016 Oct 14;16(1):267. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0783-1.
5
Implementation of the WHO-6-step method in the medical curriculum to improve pharmacology knowledge and pharmacotherapy skills.在医学课程中实施世界卫生组织的六步法,以提高药理学知识和药物治疗技能。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2015 Jun;79(6):896-906. doi: 10.1111/bcp.12575.

本文引用的文献

1
Improved junior paediatric prescribing skills after a short e-learning intervention: a randomised controlled trial.短期电子学习干预后,儿童初级处方技能提高:一项随机对照试验。
Arch Dis Child. 2011 Dec;96(12):1191-4. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2011-300577.
2
Pharmacists in general practice--a proposed role in the multidisciplinary team.全科医疗中的药剂师——多学科团队中的一个拟议角色。
Aust Fam Physician. 2010 Mar;39(3):163-4.
3
Nurse practitioner prescribing practice in Australia.澳大利亚执业护士的处方开具实践。
J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2010 Mar;22(3):150-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-7599.2009.00484.x.
4
Acquiring and refining CBT skills and competencies: which training methods are perceived to be most effective?获得并提升认知行为疗法(CBT)的技能和能力:哪些培训方法被认为是最有效的?
Behav Cogn Psychother. 2009 Oct;37(5):571-83. doi: 10.1017/S1352465809990270. Epub 2009 Aug 25.
5
Do medical courses adequately prepare interns for safe and effective prescribing in New South Wales public hospitals?医学课程是否充分使实习医生为新南威尔士州公立医院的安全有效处方做好准备?
Intern Med J. 2009 Jul;39(7):428-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2009.01942.x. Epub 2009 Mar 10.
6
Why do interns make prescribing errors? A qualitative study.实习医生为何会出现处方错误?一项定性研究。
Med J Aust. 2008 Jan 21;188(2):89-94. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2008.tb01529.x.
7
A systematic review of peer teaching and learning in clinical education.临床教育中同伴教学与学习的系统评价。
J Clin Nurs. 2008 Mar;17(6):703-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2007.01954.x. Epub 2007 Nov 30.
8
Construction and evaluation of a web-based interactive prescribing curriculum for senior medical students.面向高年级医学生的基于网络的交互式处方课程的构建与评估
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2006 Dec;62(6):653-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2006.02651.x.
9
Critical thinking as an outcome of context-based learning among post RN students: a literature review.批判性思维作为注册护士后学生基于情境学习的成果:一项文献综述。
Nurse Educ Today. 2007 Jul;27(5):420-6. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2006.07.004. Epub 2006 Sep 1.
10
Five pitfalls in decisions about diagnosis and prescribing.诊断与开处方决策中的五个陷阱。
BMJ. 2005 Apr 2;330(7494):781-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.330.7494.781.