Poller Wolfram C, Schwerg Marius, Melzer Christoph
Department for Cardiology and Angiology Charité University Hospital, Berlin, Germany.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2012 Oct;35(10):1217-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2012.03479.x. Epub 2012 Jul 30.
Cardiac device infections are serious complications that require aggressive treatment strategies, including interventional or surgical lead extraction.
Here we describe the long-time follow-up of vacuum-assisted closure (V.A.C.) treatment in five patients with local cardiac device infection (LDI). In these patients the device was removed, the electrodes were shortened, and a V.A.C. treatment was applied. The primary endpoint was defined as time to re-LDI.
Three patients had LDI of a pacemaker pocket, whereas two presented with an infection of their ICD pocket. The V.A.C. treatment was applied for 34.4 ± 17.9 days. The mean hospitalization time was 38.6 ± 19.2 days. The follow-up period was assessed for 34.6 ± 19.2 months. Only one patient developed re-LDI, 69 days after removal of the device. The other four patients did not show any signs of reinfection during the follow-up period. None of the five patients sustained serious adverse events.
V.A.C. treatment may be an option for selected patients with LDI who refuse a laser-guided lead extraction or surgical removal of the electrodes as the primary therapy.
心脏设备感染是严重的并发症,需要积极的治疗策略,包括介入或手术取出导线。
在此,我们描述了5例局部心脏设备感染(LDI)患者接受真空辅助闭合(V.A.C.)治疗的长期随访情况。在这些患者中,移除了设备,缩短了电极,并进行了V.A.C.治疗。主要终点定义为再次发生LDI的时间。
3例患者发生起搏器囊袋LDI,2例患者发生植入式心律转复除颤器(ICD)囊袋感染。V.A.C.治疗持续了34.4±17.9天。平均住院时间为38.6±19.2天。随访期为34.6±19.2个月。仅1例患者在设备移除后69天发生再次LDI。其他4例患者在随访期间未出现任何再感染迹象。5例患者均未发生严重不良事件。
对于拒绝将激光引导导线取出或手术移除电极作为主要治疗方法的特定LDI患者,V.A.C.治疗可能是一种选择。