Suppr超能文献

为什么医疗保健专业人员不谈论性?对英国近期开展的定性研究的系统评价。

Why don't healthcare professionals talk about sex? A systematic review of recent qualitative studies conducted in the United kingdom.

机构信息

Institute of Health, Life and Social Sciences, University of Lincoln, Lincoln, UK Institute of Work, Health and Organisations, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.

出版信息

J Sex Med. 2013 Nov;10(11):2658-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2012.02856.x. Epub 2012 Jul 30.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Sexuality is considered to be an important aspect of holistic care, yet research has demonstrated that it is not routinely addressed in healthcare services. A greater understanding of this can be achieved through synthesizing qualitative studies investigating healthcare professionals' experiences of talking about sex. In doing so, policy makers and healthcare providers may be able to better address the sexual issues of service users.

AIM

To gain an in-depth understanding of healthcare professionals' subjective experience of discussing sexuality with service users by identifying the factors that impede and facilitate such discussions.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Review of healthcare professionals' experience of discussing sexuality with service users.

METHODS

Electronic databases and reference lists of published articles were searched in July 2011. Primary research studies were included in the review if they explored health professionals' experiences of discussing sexuality with adult service users, used qualitative methods, and were conducted in the United Kingdom over the last 10 years. Each study was reviewed and assessed. A secondary thematic analysis method was used where key themes were extracted and grouped and key concepts were explored.

RESULTS

Nineteen interconnected themes emerged relating to healthcare professionals' experience of discussing sexuality with service users, including fear about "opening up a can of worms," lack of time, resources, and training, concern about knowledge and abilities, worry about causing offense, personal discomfort, and a lack of awareness about sexual issues. Some themes were particularly marked relating to the sexuality of the opposite-gender, black and ethnic minority groups, older and nonheterosexual service users, and those with intellectual disabilities.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of healthcare professionals do not proactively discuss sexuality issues with service users, and this warrants further attention. An understanding of the perceived barriers and facilitators indicates that interventions to improve the extent to which sexuality issues are addressed need to take organizational, structural, and personal factors into consideration.

摘要

简介

性被认为是整体护理的一个重要方面,但研究表明,医疗保健服务中通常不涉及性问题。通过综合研究医疗保健专业人员谈论性的经验,可以更好地了解这一点。通过这种方式,政策制定者和医疗保健提供者也许能够更好地解决服务使用者的性问题。

目的

通过确定阻碍和促进此类讨论的因素,深入了解医疗保健专业人员与服务使用者讨论性问题的主观经验。

主要结果测量

审查医疗保健专业人员与服务使用者讨论性问题的经验。

方法

于 2011 年 7 月检索电子数据库和已发表文章的参考文献列表。如果研究探讨了卫生专业人员与成年服务使用者讨论性问题的经验,使用定性方法,并在过去 10 年内在英国进行,则将这些研究纳入综述。对每项研究进行了审查和评估。使用二级主题分析方法,提取和分组关键主题,并探讨关键概念。

结果

出现了 19 个相互关联的主题,涉及医疗保健专业人员与服务使用者讨论性问题的经验,包括担心“打开潘多拉的盒子”、缺乏时间、资源和培训、对知识和能力的关注、担心冒犯、个人不适和对性问题的认识不足。有些主题特别明显,涉及异性、黑人和少数族裔群体、年龄较大和非异性恋服务使用者以及智力残疾服务使用者的性问题。

结论

大多数医疗保健专业人员不会主动与服务使用者讨论性问题,这值得进一步关注。对感知障碍和促进因素的理解表明,为了提高解决性问题的程度,需要考虑组织、结构和个人因素的干预措施。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验