Department of Dermatology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA.
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2013 Jan;68(1):64-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2012.06.035. Epub 2012 Jul 28.
Despite widespread dissatisfaction and low treatment persistence in moderate to severe psoriasis, patients' reasons behind treatment discontinuation remain poorly understood.
We sought to characterize patient-reported reasons for discontinuing commonly used treatments for moderate to severe psoriasis in real-world clinical practice.
A total of 1095 patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis from 10 dermatology practices who received systemic treatments completed a structured interview. Eleven reasons for treatment discontinuation were assessed for all past treatments.
A total of 2231 past treatments were reported. Median treatment duration varied by treatment, ranging from 6.0 to 20.5 months (P < .001). The frequency of each cited discontinuation reasons differed by treatment (all P < .01). Patients who received etanercept (odds ratio [OR] 5.19; 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.23-8.33) and adalimumab (OR 2.10; 95% CI 1.20-3.67) were more likely to cite a loss of efficacy than those who received methotrexate. Patients who received etanercept (OR 0.34; 95% CI 0.23-0.49), adalimumab (OR 0.48; 95% CI 0.30-0.75), and ultraviolet B phototherapy (OR 0.21; 95% CI 0.14-0.31) were less likely to cite side effects than those who received methotrexate, whereas those who received acitretin (OR 1.56; 95% CI 1.08-2.25) were more likely to do so. Patients who underwent ultraviolet B phototherapy were more likely to cite an inability to afford treatment (OR 7.03; 95% CI 3.14-15.72).
The study is limited by its reliance on patient recall.
Different patterns of treatment discontinuation reasons are important to consider when developing public policy and evidence-based treatment approaches to improve successful long-term psoriasis control.
尽管中重度银屑病患者普遍不满且治疗持续性低,但他们停药的原因仍知之甚少。
我们旨在描述真实临床实践中中重度银屑病患者停止使用常用治疗方法的报告原因。
来自 10 家皮肤科诊所的 1095 名中重度斑块状银屑病患者接受了系统治疗,他们完成了一项结构化访谈。对所有既往治疗方法评估了 11 种停药原因。
共报告了 2231 种既往治疗方法。每种治疗方法的治疗持续时间中位数不同,范围为 6.0 至 20.5 个月(P<0.001)。每种治疗方法的报告停药原因频率不同(均 P<0.01)。与接受甲氨蝶呤的患者相比,接受依那西普(比值比[OR]5.19;95%置信区间[CI]3.23-8.33)和阿达木单抗(OR 2.10;95% CI 1.20-3.67)的患者更可能报告疗效丧失。与接受甲氨蝶呤的患者相比,接受依那西普(OR 0.34;95% CI 0.23-0.49)、阿达木单抗(OR 0.48;95% CI 0.30-0.75)和紫外线 B 光疗(OR 0.21;95% CI 0.14-0.31)的患者不太可能报告副作用,而接受阿维 A 的患者更可能报告副作用(OR 1.56;95% CI 1.08-2.25)。接受紫外线 B 光疗的患者更可能因无法负担治疗费用而停药(OR 7.03;95% CI 3.14-15.72)。
该研究的局限性在于依赖于患者的回忆。
在制定公共政策和循证治疗方法以改善成功的长期银屑病控制时,考虑不同的停药原因模式非常重要。