• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从患者角度看影响炎症性关节炎 b/ts DMARDs 选择的因素:全球证据的系统评价和来自香港的基于患者的调查。

Factors influencing choice of b/ts DMARDs in managing inflammatory arthritis from a patient perspective: a systematic review of global evidence and a patient-based survey from Hong Kong.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, School of Clinical Medicine, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, People's Republic of China.

Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacy, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2023 Oct 12;13(10):e069681. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069681.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069681
PMID:37827733
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10583073/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To investigate factors concerning patients regarding biological/target synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (b/ts DMARDs) in treating inflammatory arthritis (IA).

DESIGN

This study consists of a systematic review and a cross-sectional survey in Hong Kong. A systematic review of literature following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses was conducted on PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane and Embase between 1 January 2000 and 1 January 2022. Content analysis was conducted to summarise factors grouped by four themes-social aspects (SA), clinical aspects (CA), medicine characteristics (MC) and financial aspects (FA) in the decision-making process. One cross-sectional survey among Hong Kong patients with IA was conducted to add to global evidence.

SETTING

A systematic review of global evidence and a patient-based survey in Hong Kong to complement scarce evidence in Asia regions.

RESULTS

The systematic review resulted in 34 studies. The four themes were presented in descending order consistently but varied with frequency throughout decision-making processes. During decision-making involving medication initiation, preference and discontinuation, MC (reported frequency: 83%, 86%, 78%), SA (56%, 43%, 78%) and FA (39%, 33%, 56%) were the three most frequently reported factors, whereas CA was less studied. Local survey also revealed that MC factors such as treatment efficacy and the probability of severe adverse events, and SA factors such as the availability of government or charity subsidy, influenced patients' initiation and preference for b/ts DMARDs. Meanwhile, self-estimated improvement in disease conditions (SA), drug side effects (MC) and drug costs (FA) were associated with treatment discontinuation.

CONCLUSIONS

Global and local evidence consistently indicate that MC and SA are important considerations in patients' decisions regarding novel DMARDs. Health policies that reduce patients' financial burden and enhances healthcare professionals' engagement in decision-making and treatment delivery should be in place with an efficient healthcare system for managing IA optimistically.

摘要

目的

调查患者在使用生物/靶向合成的疾病修正抗风湿药物(b/ts DMARDs)治疗炎症性关节炎(IA)方面的相关因素。

设计

本研究包括香港的系统评价和横断面调查。我们在 PubMed、Web of Science、Cochrane 和 Embase 数据库中对 2000 年 1 月 1 日至 2022 年 1 月 1 日期间发表的文献进行了系统评价,检索词为“inflammatory arthritis”“biological synthetic DMARDs”“targeted synthetic DMARDs”“treatment decision”。采用内容分析法对四个主题(社会方面、临床方面、药物特性和经济方面)的决策过程中的相关因素进行了总结。我们还在香港开展了一项针对 IA 患者的横断面调查,以补充亚洲地区稀缺的证据。

地点

全球证据的系统评价和香港的患者调查,以补充亚洲地区的证据。

结果

系统评价共纳入 34 项研究。四个主题按照降序排列,但在决策过程中频率不同。在药物起始、偏好和停药的决策过程中,药物特性(报道频率:83%、86%、78%)、社会方面(56%、43%、78%)和经济方面(39%、33%、56%)是三个最常被报道的因素,而临床方面的因素研究较少。本地调查还显示,药物特性因素(如治疗效果和严重不良事件的概率)和社会方面因素(如政府或慈善机构的补贴可用性)影响患者对 b/ts DMARDs 的起始和偏好。同时,患者对疾病状况改善的自我评估(社会方面)、药物副作用(药物特性)和药物费用(经济方面)与治疗停药有关。

结论

全球和本地证据一致表明,药物特性和社会方面是患者对新型 DMARDs 决策的重要考虑因素。应制定降低患者经济负担的卫生政策,并加强医疗保健专业人员在决策和治疗实施方面的参与,以建立一个高效的卫生系统,乐观地管理 IA。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8bfa/10583073/3db45bfc0e0a/bmjopen-2022-069681f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8bfa/10583073/7da95208f7ac/bmjopen-2022-069681f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8bfa/10583073/d1e0719de994/bmjopen-2022-069681f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8bfa/10583073/3db45bfc0e0a/bmjopen-2022-069681f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8bfa/10583073/7da95208f7ac/bmjopen-2022-069681f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8bfa/10583073/d1e0719de994/bmjopen-2022-069681f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8bfa/10583073/3db45bfc0e0a/bmjopen-2022-069681f03.jpg

相似文献

1
Factors influencing choice of b/ts DMARDs in managing inflammatory arthritis from a patient perspective: a systematic review of global evidence and a patient-based survey from Hong Kong.从患者角度看影响炎症性关节炎 b/ts DMARDs 选择的因素:全球证据的系统评价和来自香港的基于患者的调查。
BMJ Open. 2023 Oct 12;13(10):e069681. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069681.
2
Factors influencing clinician prescribing of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs for inflammatory arthritis: A systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies.影响临床医生为炎症性关节炎开具疾病修正抗风湿药物的因素:系统评价和定性研究的主题综合分析。
Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2022 Aug;55:151988. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2022.151988. Epub 2022 Feb 27.
3
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
4
The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of abatacept, adalimumab, etanercept and tocilizumab for treating juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a systematic review and economic evaluation.阿巴西普、阿达木单抗、依那西普和托珠单抗治疗幼年特发性关节炎的临床有效性和成本效益:一项系统评价和经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2016 Apr;20(34):1-222. doi: 10.3310/hta20340.
5
Management of rheumatoid arthritis: 2019 updated consensus recommendations from the Hong Kong Society of Rheumatology.类风湿关节炎的管理:香港风湿病学会 2019 年更新的共识建议。
Clin Rheumatol. 2019 Dec;38(12):3331-3350. doi: 10.1007/s10067-019-04761-5. Epub 2019 Sep 4.
6
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
7
Patient participation in decisions about disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs: a cross-sectional survey.患者参与改善病情抗风湿药物治疗决策的横断面调查。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014 Oct 4;15:333. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-15-333.
8
Summary of AHRQ's comparative effectiveness review of drug therapy for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in adults--an update.美国医疗保健研究与质量局(AHRQ)对成人类风湿关节炎(RA)药物治疗的比较效果评估综述——最新情况
J Manag Care Pharm. 2012 May;18(4 Supp C):S1-18. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2012.18.s4-c.1.
9
Non-biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) improve pain in inflammatory arthritis (IA): a systematic literature review of randomized controlled trials.非生物性改善病情抗风湿药物(DMARDs)可改善炎症性关节炎(IA)的疼痛:一项随机对照试验的系统文献回顾。
Rheumatol Int. 2013 May;33(5):1105-20. doi: 10.1007/s00296-012-2619-6. Epub 2013 Jan 6.
10
Biologic or tofacitinib monotherapy for rheumatoid arthritis in people with traditional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) failure: a Cochrane Systematic Review and network meta-analysis (NMA).生物制剂或托法替布单药治疗传统抗风湿药物(DMARD)治疗失败的类风湿关节炎患者:一项Cochrane系统评价和网状Meta分析(NMA)
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Nov 17;11(11):CD012437. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012437.

引用本文的文献

1
Analysis of data on biosimilar prescription rates in rheumatology practice from a reference center in Turkey.来自土耳其一个参考中心的风湿病学实践中生物类似药处方率数据的分析。
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 7;15(1):28853. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-14816-0.
2
Cost-Effectiveness of Biosimilars vs Leflunomide in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis.生物类似药与来氟米特治疗类风湿关节炎患者的成本效益比较。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jun 3;7(6):e2418800. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.18800.

本文引用的文献

1
Methods to Summarize Discrete-Choice Experiments in a Systematic Review: A Scoping Review.系统评价中总结离散选择实验的方法:范围综述。
Patient. 2022 Nov;15(6):629-639. doi: 10.1007/s40271-022-00587-7. Epub 2022 Jul 13.
2
Patient Perspectives on Biologics for Axial Spondyloarthritis in a Cross-sectional Study in a Predominantly Female Population: Treatment Satisfaction, Wear-off Between Doses, and Use of Supplemental Medication.在一项以女性为主的横断面研究中,强直性脊柱炎患者对生物制剂的看法:治疗满意度、剂量间隔期药效减退及补充药物的使用情况
Rheumatol Ther. 2022 Apr;9(2):509-520. doi: 10.1007/s40744-021-00417-6. Epub 2021 Dec 27.
3
A Systematic Review of Discrete Choice Experiment Studies in Rheumatoid Arthritis Biological Medicines.
类风湿性关节炎生物药物离散选择实验研究的系统评价
Mediterr J Rheumatol. 2021 Jun 30;32(2):104-111. doi: 10.31138/mjr.32.2.104. eCollection 2021 Jun.
4
Preference for Telemedicine Versus In-Person Visit Among Patients with Psoriasis Receiving Biological Drugs.接受生物药物治疗的银屑病患者对远程医疗与面对面就诊的偏好。
Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2021 Aug;11(4):1333-1343. doi: 10.1007/s13555-021-00555-3. Epub 2021 Jun 25.
5
Psoriasis awareness among general population: preliminary results of an online survey.银屑病认知度在普通人群中的调查:一项在线调查的初步结果。
Ital J Dermatol Venerol. 2021 Dec;156(6):665-668. doi: 10.23736/S2784-8671.21.06822-X. Epub 2021 Apr 29.
6
Updating guidance for reporting systematic reviews: development of the PRISMA 2020 statement.更新系统评价报告指南:PRISMA 2020 声明的制定。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Jun;134:103-112. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.02.003. Epub 2021 Feb 9.
7
Exploring determinants of psoriasis patients' treatment choices: a discrete-choice experiment study in the United States and Germany.探究银屑病患者治疗选择的决定因素:一项在美国和德国开展的离散选择实验研究。
J Dermatolog Treat. 2022 May;33(3):1511-1520. doi: 10.1080/09546634.2020.1839007. Epub 2021 Feb 3.
8
Patient preferences on rheumatoid arthritis second-line treatment: a discrete choice experiment of Swedish patients.患者对类风湿关节炎二线治疗的偏好:瑞典患者的离散选择实验。
Arthritis Res Ther. 2020 Dec 19;22(1):288. doi: 10.1186/s13075-020-02391-w.
9
Pop a pill or give myself a shot? Patient perspectives of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug choice for rheumatoid arthritis.口服药物还是自我注射?类风湿关节炎患者对疾病修饰抗风湿药物选择的看法。
Joint Bone Spine. 2021 Jan;88(1):105053. doi: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2020.07.002. Epub 2020 Jul 15.
10
The importance of understanding patient and physician preferences for psoriasis treatment characteristics: a systematic review of discrete-choice experiments.理解患者和医生对银屑病治疗特征的偏好的重要性:一项离散选择实验的系统评价。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2020 Aug;36(8):1257-1275. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2020.1776233. Epub 2020 Jul 1.