• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过小组概念映射开发和验证一种银屑病治疗可接受性测量工具。

Development and validation of a psoriasis treatment acceptability measure through group concept mapping.

机构信息

Clinical Outcomes Solutions, 1820 E River Rd, Ste 220, Tucson, AZ, 85718, USA.

Clinical Outcomes Solutions, Chicago, IL, USA.

出版信息

Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2023 Aug 8;21(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s12955-023-02162-6.

DOI:10.1186/s12955-023-02162-6
PMID:37553594
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10408213/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Psoriasis is a common autoimmune dermatologic condition which has a pronounced negative impact on patient quality of life and disease burden. Currently, there are a number of treatments available for psoriasis, with differences in efficacy, mechanism of action, mode of administration, adverse effects, and tolerability. However, a reliable, validated patient-reported instrument to address patient expectations and of psoriasis treatment has not been developed. This project was undertaken with the aim of developing a fit-for-purpose self-reported instrument to inform patient expectations and preferences of psoriasis treatments.

METHODS

Two studies, both utilizing qualitative and quantitative methods, were conducted in patients within the entire spectrum of psoriasis severity. In Study 1, a group concept mapping (GCM) exercise was conducted with dermatologists and moderate-to-severe psoriasis patients to identify concepts important in the treatment of psoriasis. In Study 2, a preliminary Treatment Acceptability Questionnaire (TAQ) was developed using GCM-derived concepts from Studies 1 and 2, followed by cognitive debriefing (CD) telephone interviews of the preliminary TAQ. In Study 2, another GCM exercise was conducted with mild and newly diagnosed psoriasis patients. Psychometric analyses were performed on the TAQ to evaluate validity and reliability.

RESULTS

The Study 1 GCM exercise generated 43 concepts from moderate-to-severe psoriasis patients (n = 20) and dermatologists (n = 10). In Study 2, 37 GCM concepts were generated from mild and newly diagnosed psoriasis patients (n = 20). From the 2 GCM exercises, 28 concepts were selected to form the preliminary TAQ; CD interviews indicated strong understanding and relevance of TAQ items among patients with disease ranging from mild to severe. The final TAQ consisted of 20 items; psychometric analysis demonstrated strong validity and reliability of the TAQ.

CONCLUSIONS

The TAQ is a novel psychometrically validated patient-reported instrument to inform healthcare providers of patients' expectations of and preferences for treatment of their psoriasis and can help in shared decision making between patients and physicians.

摘要

背景

银屑病是一种常见的自身免疫性皮肤病,对患者的生活质量和疾病负担有明显的负面影响。目前,有许多治疗银屑病的方法,其疗效、作用机制、给药方式、不良反应和耐受性存在差异。然而,尚未开发出一种可靠、经过验证的患者报告工具来评估患者对银屑病治疗的期望。本项目旨在开发一种适合的自我报告工具,以了解患者对银屑病治疗的期望和偏好。

方法

两项研究均采用定性和定量方法,在整个银屑病严重程度范围内的患者中进行。在研究 1 中,对皮肤科医生和中重度银屑病患者进行了小组概念映射(GCM)练习,以确定治疗银屑病的重要概念。在研究 2 中,使用来自研究 1 和 2 的 GCM 衍生概念开发了初步的治疗可接受性问卷(TAQ),随后对初步 TAQ 进行了认知访谈。在研究 2 中,还对轻度和新诊断的银屑病患者进行了另一次 GCM 练习。对 TAQ 进行了心理测量学分析,以评估其有效性和可靠性。

结果

研究 1 的 GCM 练习从中重度银屑病患者(n=20)和皮肤科医生(n=10)中生成了 43 个概念。在研究 2 中,20 名轻度和新诊断的银屑病患者生成了 37 个 GCM 概念。从这 2 项 GCM 练习中,选择了 28 个概念来形成初步的 TAQ;认知访谈表明,疾病从轻度到重度的患者对 TAQ 项目有很强的理解和相关性。最终的 TAQ 由 20 个项目组成;心理测量分析表明 TAQ 具有很强的有效性和可靠性。

结论

TAQ 是一种新颖的心理测量验证患者报告工具,可向医疗保健提供者提供患者对其银屑病治疗的期望和偏好,并有助于患者和医生之间的共同决策。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c039/10408213/dbc0443bc24d/12955_2023_2162_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c039/10408213/3ab804505ad4/12955_2023_2162_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c039/10408213/dbc0443bc24d/12955_2023_2162_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c039/10408213/3ab804505ad4/12955_2023_2162_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c039/10408213/dbc0443bc24d/12955_2023_2162_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Development and validation of a psoriasis treatment acceptability measure through group concept mapping.通过小组概念映射开发和验证一种银屑病治疗可接受性测量工具。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2023 Aug 8;21(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s12955-023-02162-6.
2
Development and Content Validity Testing of a Patient-Reported Treatment Acceptance Measure for Use in Patients Receiving Treatment via Subcutaneous Injection.皮下注射治疗患者报告的治疗接受度测量工具的开发与内容效度测试
Value Health. 2015 Dec;18(8):1000-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2015.09.2937. Epub 2015 Nov 18.
3
Development and preliminary validation of the Adolescent Psoriasis Quality of Life instrument: a disease-specific measure of quality of life in adolescents with psoriasis.青少年银屑病生活质量量表的开发与初步验证:一种针对青少年银屑病患者生活质量的疾病特异性测量工具。
Br J Dermatol. 2020 Jul;183(1):96-104. doi: 10.1111/bjd.18719. Epub 2020 Jan 29.
4
Development and psychometric evaluation of the self-assessment of psoriasis symptoms (SAPS) - clinical trial and the SAPS - real world patient-reported outcomes.银屑病症状自我评估(SAPS)的开发与心理测量评估——临床试验及SAPS——真实世界患者报告结局
J Dermatolog Treat. 2017 Sep;28(6):505-514. doi: 10.1080/09546634.2017.1290206. Epub 2017 Mar 2.
5
Development and psychometric validation of the REFlective evaLuation of psoriasis Efficacy of Treatment and Severity (REFLETS) questionnaire: a common measure of plaque-type psoriasis severity and treatment efficacy for patients and clinicians.银屑病治疗效果与严重程度的反思性评估(REFLETS)问卷的开发及心理测量学验证:一种用于患者和临床医生的斑块型银屑病严重程度及治疗效果的通用测量工具
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2015 Mar;29(3):498-506. doi: 10.1111/jdv.12601. Epub 2014 Jul 25.
6
The Psoriasis Symptom Diary: development and content validity of a novel patient-reported outcome instrument.银屑病症状日记:一种新型患者报告结局工具的开发与内容效度
Int J Dermatol. 2014 Jun;53(6):714-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-4632.2012.05798.x. Epub 2013 Apr 4.
7
Psychometric evaluation of a patient-reported outcomes instrument for congenital thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura.先天性血栓性血小板减少性紫癜患者报告结局量表的心理计量学评价。
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2023 Jul 14;7(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s41687-023-00592-w.
8
Is the EQ-5D fit for purpose in asthma? Acceptability and content validity from the patient perspective.EQ-5D 在哮喘中的适用性如何?从患者角度看可接受性和内容效度。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018 Aug 3;16(1):160. doi: 10.1186/s12955-018-0970-3.
9
Development of the PSORIQoL, a psoriasis-specific measure of quality of life designed for use in clinical practice and trials.银屑病生活质量量表(PSORIQoL)的开发,这是一种专为临床实践和试验设计的银屑病特异性生活质量测量工具。
Br J Dermatol. 2003 Aug;149(2):323-31. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2133.2003.05492.x.
10
Psychometric Evaluation of a Treatment Acceptance Measure for Use in Patients Receiving Treatment via Subcutaneous Injection.用于接受皮下注射治疗患者的治疗接受度测量工具的心理测量学评估
Value Health. 2017 Mar;20(3):430-440. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.09.2410. Epub 2016 Dec 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Objectivisation by Flow Cytometry Analysis of Major Lymphocytes Subsets.通过主要淋巴细胞亚群的流式细胞术分析实现银屑病面积和严重程度指数(PASI)的客观化
Acta Inform Med. 2023;31(3):206-210. doi: 10.5455/aim.2023.31.206-210.

本文引用的文献

1
Psoriasis Prevalence in Adults in the United States.美国成年人银屑病患病率。
JAMA Dermatol. 2021 Aug 1;157(8):940-946. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2021.2007.
2
A Study Comparing Patient and Clinician Perspectives of Treatments for Multiple Sclerosis via Group Concept Mapping.一项通过群组概念构图比较患者与临床医生对多发性硬化症治疗观点的研究。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2021 May 12;15:975-987. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S297052. eCollection 2021.
3
The Evolution of Quality of Life Assessment and Use in Dermatology.《皮肤病学中生活质量评估及应用的演变》。
Dermatology. 2019;235(3):167-174. doi: 10.1159/000496923. Epub 2019 Mar 29.
4
The power of the group: comparison of interviews and group concept mapping for identifying patient-important outcomes of care.群体的力量:比较访谈和群体概念映射以确定护理的患者重要结局。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 Jan 8;19(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0656-x.
5
Association of Psoriasis With Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.银屑病与炎症性肠病的相关性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Dermatol. 2018 Dec 1;154(12):1417-1423. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2018.3631.
6
Validated patient-reported outcome measurements for psoriasis may not reflect patients' current preferences.经验证的银屑病患者报告结局测量指标可能无法反映患者当前的偏好。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019 May;80(5):1445-1447.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2018.09.019. Epub 2018 Sep 20.
7
Are Your Patients Satisfied A Systematic Review of Treatment Satisfaction Measures in Psoriasis.你的患者满意吗?银屑病治疗满意度测量的系统评价
Dermatology. 2018;234(5-6):157-165. doi: 10.1159/000490413. Epub 2018 Aug 17.
8
"Why I Chose Hemodialysis Over Peritoneal Dialysis": An Opinion Survey Among In-Center Hemodialysis Patients.《为何我选择血液透析而非腹膜透析》:中心血液透析患者意见调查
Perit Dial Int. 2018 Jul-Aug;38(4):305-308. doi: 10.3747/pdi.2017.00116.
9
A Cross-Sectional Study Assessing Treatment Preference of People With Chronic Low Back Pain.一项评估慢性下背痛患者治疗偏好的横断面研究。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018 Dec;99(12):2496-2503. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2018.04.027. Epub 2018 May 28.
10
A comparison of three methods to generate a conceptual understanding of a disease based on the patients' perspective.基于患者视角生成对疾病概念理解的三种方法的比较。
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2017;1(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s41687-017-0013-6. Epub 2017 Dec 19.