Esteban J, Sandoval E, Cordero-Ampuero J, Molina-Manso D, Ortiz-Pérez A, Fernández-Roblas R, Gómez-Barrena E
Departments of Clinical Microbiology, IIS-Fundacin Jimnez Daz, Madrid, Spain.
Open Orthop J. 2012;6:255-60. doi: 10.2174/1874325001206010255. Epub 2012 Jun 29.
Sonication is currently considered the best procedure for microbiological diagnosis of implant-related osteoarticular infection, but studies in nail-related infections are lacking. The study aim was to evaluate implant sonication after intramedullary nail explantation, and relate it to microbiological cultures and clinical outcome.
A study was performed in two University Hospitals from the same city. Thirty-one patients with implanted nails were prospectively included, whether with clinical infection (8 cases) or without (23 cases). Retrieved nails underwent sonication according a previously published protocol. The clinical and microbiological outcome patient was related to the presence of microorganisms in the retrieved implant.
Positive results appeared in 15/31 patients (9 with polymicrobial infections) almost doubling those clinically infected cases. The most commonly isolated organisms were Staphylococcus epidermidis (19.2 %) and Staphylococcus aureus (15.4 %). A significant relationship was found between the presence of positive cultures and previous local superficial infection (p=0.019). The presence of usual pathogens was significantly related to clinical infection (p=0.005) or local superficial infection (p=0.032). All patients with positive cultures showed pain diminution or absence of pain after nail removal (15/15), but this only occurred in 8 (out of 16) patients with negative cultures.
In patients with previously diagnosed infection or local superficial infection, study of the hardware is mandatory. In cases where pain or patient discomfort is observed, nail sonication can help diagnose the implant colonization with potential pathogens that might require specific treatment to improve the final outcome.
目前,超声处理被认为是诊断植入物相关骨关节炎感染的最佳微生物学诊断方法,但针对髓内钉相关感染的研究较少。本研究旨在评估髓内钉取出后的植入物超声处理情况,并将其与微生物培养及临床结果相关联。
在同一城市的两家大学医院开展了一项研究。前瞻性纳入了31例植入髓内钉的患者,其中有临床感染的患者8例,无临床感染的患者23例。按照先前公布的方案对取出的髓内钉进行超声处理。将患者的临床和微生物学结果与取出的植入物中微生物的存在情况相关联。
31例患者中有15例结果呈阳性(9例为混合感染),几乎是临床感染病例的两倍。最常分离出的微生物是表皮葡萄球菌(19.2%)和金黄色葡萄球菌(15.4%)。培养结果为阳性与既往局部浅表感染之间存在显著相关性(p = 0.019)。常见病原体的存在与临床感染(p = 0.005)或局部浅表感染(p = 0.032)显著相关。所有培养结果为阳性的患者在取出髓内钉后疼痛减轻或消失(15/15),但这仅发生在16例培养结果为阴性的患者中的8例。
对于先前诊断为感染或局部浅表感染的患者,必须对植入物进行检查。在观察到疼痛或患者不适的情况下,髓内钉超声处理有助于诊断植入物是否被潜在病原体定植;这些病原体可能需要特定治疗以改善最终结果。