Infection Control Unit, Santa Isabel Hospital, São Paulo, Brazil.
Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Santa Casa de São Paulo School of Medicine, São Paulo, Brazil.
J Clin Microbiol. 2014 Dec;52(12):4176-82. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02140-14. Epub 2014 Sep 17.
Previous studies have shown that sonication fluid cultures from removed orthopedic devices improved the microbiological diagnosis of orthopedic implant-associated infections; however, few of these investigations have applied sonication to the removed fracture fixation devices to evaluate its utility for the diagnosis of osteosynthesis-associated infection (OAI). We compared sonication fluid to conventional tissue cultures from 180 subjects with different sizes of plates and screws (n = 156), spinal implants (n = 26), and intramedullary nails (n = 3), of whom 125 and 55 subjects had OAI and noninfected osteosynthesis (NIO), respectively. The sensitivity for detecting OAI was 90.4% for sonication fluid culture and 56.8% for periprosthetic tissue cultures (P < 0.05), and the specificities were 90.9% and 96.4%, respectively. Sonication fluid culture detected more pathogens than peri-implant tissue culture (113 versus 71; P < 0.001), while polymicrobial infections were diagnosed by sonication fluid cultures and tissue cultures in 20.8% and 8% (P < 0.001), respectively. Microbiological diagnosis was achieved exclusively by sonication fluid cultures for 47 (90.4%) subjects, and among them, 18 (38.3%) had previously received antibiotics, whereas in five (9.6%) infected subjects, tissue culture was positive and the sonication fluid culture was negative. Among 39 (31.2%) OAI cases receiving antibiotics, the identification of the organisms occurred in 38.5% and 82.1% of the tissue and sonication fluid cultures, respectively (P < 0.049). We demonstrated that sonication fluid culture from removed osteosyntheses has the potential for improving the microbiological diagnosis of OAI.
先前的研究表明,从取出的骨科设备中进行超声液培养可提高骨科植入物相关感染的微生物学诊断;然而,这些研究中很少有将超声应用于取出的骨折固定装置,以评估其在诊断骨固定术相关感染(OAI)中的实用性。我们比较了来自 180 名不同大小的钢板和螺钉(n=156)、脊柱植入物(n=26)和髓内钉(n=3)患者的超声液和传统组织培养,其中 125 名和 55 名患者分别患有 OAI 和非感染性骨固定术(NIO)。超声液培养检测 OAI 的敏感性为 90.4%,而假体周围组织培养的敏感性为 56.8%(P<0.05),特异性分别为 90.9%和 96.4%。超声液培养比假体周围组织培养检测到更多的病原体(113 比 71;P<0.001),而超声液和组织培养分别在 20.8%和 8%的病例中诊断出混合感染(P<0.001)。47 名(90.4%)患者仅通过超声液培养即可进行微生物学诊断,其中 18 名(38.3%)患者之前接受过抗生素治疗,而在 5 名(9.6%)感染患者中,组织培养阳性而超声液培养阴性。在 39 名(31.2%)接受抗生素治疗的 OAI 病例中,组织和超声液培养分别在 38.5%和 82.1%的病例中鉴定出病原体(P<0.049)。我们证明,从取出的骨固定装置中进行超声液培养有潜力提高 OAI 的微生物学诊断。