Suppr超能文献

儿童结核病诊断中临床诊断系统的系统评价。

A systematic review of clinical diagnostic systems used in the diagnosis of tuberculosis in children.

作者信息

Pearce Emily C, Woodward Jason F, Nyandiko Winstone M, Vreeman Rachel C, Ayaya Samuel O

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.

出版信息

AIDS Res Treat. 2012;2012:401896. doi: 10.1155/2012/401896. Epub 2012 Jul 17.

Abstract

Background. Tuberculosis (TB) is difficult to diagnose in children due to lack of a gold standard, especially in resource-limited settings. Scoring systems and diagnostic criteria are often used to assist in diagnosis; however their validity, especially in areas with high HIV prevalence, remains unclear. Methods. We searched online bibliographic databases, including MEDLINE and EMBASE. We selected all studies involving scoring systems or diagnostic criteria used to aid in the diagnosis of tuberculosis in children and extracted data from these studies. Results. The search yielded 2261 titles, of which 40 met selection criteria. Eighteen studies used point-based scoring systems. Eighteen studies used diagnostic criteria. Validation of these scoring systems yielded varying sensitivities as gold standards used ranged widely. Four studies evaluated and compared multiple scoring criteria. Ten studies selected for pulmonary tuberculosis. Five studies specifically evaluated the use of scoring systems in HIV-positive children, generally finding the specificity to be lower. Conclusions. Though scoring systems and diagnostic criteria remain widely used in the diagnosis of tuberculosis in children, validation has been difficult due to lack of an established and accessible gold standard. Estimates of sensitivity and specificity vary widely, especially in populations with high HIV co-infection.

摘要

背景。由于缺乏金标准,儿童结核病难以诊断,在资源有限的环境中尤其如此。评分系统和诊断标准常被用于辅助诊断;然而,其有效性,尤其是在艾滋病毒高流行地区,仍不明确。方法。我们检索了在线书目数据库,包括MEDLINE和EMBASE。我们选择了所有涉及用于辅助儿童结核病诊断的评分系统或诊断标准的研究,并从这些研究中提取数据。结果。检索得到2261个标题,其中40个符合选择标准。18项研究使用了基于点数的评分系统。18项研究使用了诊断标准。由于所使用的金标准差异很大,这些评分系统的验证产生了不同的敏感性。4项研究评估并比较了多种评分标准。10项研究针对肺结核。5项研究专门评估了评分系统在艾滋病毒阳性儿童中的使用情况,通常发现特异性较低。结论。尽管评分系统和诊断标准在儿童结核病诊断中仍被广泛使用,但由于缺乏既定且可获取的金标准,验证工作一直很困难。敏感性和特异性的估计差异很大,尤其是在艾滋病毒合并感染率高的人群中。

相似文献

4
Screening tests for active pulmonary tuberculosis in children.儿童活动性肺结核筛查试验。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Jun 28;6(6):CD013693. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013693.pub2.

引用本文的文献

10
Advances in the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis in children.儿童肺结核病的诊断进展。
Paediatr Respir Rev. 2020 Nov;36:52-56. doi: 10.1016/j.prrv.2020.05.003. Epub 2020 May 25.

本文引用的文献

8
Recent advances in the diagnosis of childhood tuberculosis.儿童结核病诊断的最新进展
Arch Dis Child. 2007 May;92(5):446-52. doi: 10.1136/adc.2006.104976.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验