• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

食管癌和胃癌切除术后的死亡率。

Mortality after esophageal and gastric cancer resection.

机构信息

SER-Epidemiological Department, Veneto Region, Passaggio Gaudenzio 1, 35131 Padova, Italy.

出版信息

World J Surg. 2012 Nov;36(11):2630-6. doi: 10.1007/s00268-012-1724-8.

DOI:10.1007/s00268-012-1724-8
PMID:22851145
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Contrasting findings on trends and determinants of operative mortality after surgery for esophageal and gastric cancer have been reported from population-based studies.

METHODS

Discharge records of residents in the Veneto Region (northeastern Italy) with a diagnosis of esophageal or gastric cancer and intervention codes for esophagectomy or gastrectomy were extracted for the years 2000-2009. In-hospital, 30-day, 90-day, and perioperative (30-day + in-hospital) mortality were computed. The influence of patient and hospital variables on in-hospital mortality was assessed through multilevel models.

RESULTS

Overall, 6,500 resections were performed in the period of 2000-2009, with a 10 % decline in the second half of the study period. In-hospital mortality was 4.6 % (5.3 % in 2000-2004 and 3.8 % in 2005-2009) and was higher for extended total gastrectomy and total esophagectomy. In 2005-2009 mortality declined for all resection types except extended total gastrectomy (8.0 %). For esophageal procedures, 30-day mortality was lower than in-hospital or perioperative mortality. A protective effect of procedural volume was found for esophageal but not for gastric resections; among gastric procedures, mortality was higher in male patients and in extended total gastrectomy patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Analyses of discharge records allowed investigation at a population level of time trends (downward mainly for esophageal resections) and determinants of perioperative mortality (hospital volume, gender, and procedure type).

摘要

背景

基于人群的研究报告了食管和胃癌手术后手术死亡率的趋势和决定因素的对比结果。

方法

从 2000 年至 2009 年,提取了威尼托地区(意大利东北部)居民的诊断为食管癌或胃癌的出院记录以及用于食管切除术或胃切除术的干预代码。计算了住院、30 天、90 天和围手术期(30 天+住院)死亡率。通过多水平模型评估患者和医院变量对住院死亡率的影响。

结果

在 2000-2009 年期间,共进行了 6500 例切除术,研究期间的后半段下降了 10%。住院死亡率为 4.6%(2000-2004 年为 5.3%,2005-2009 年为 3.8%),且扩大全胃切除术和全食管切除术的死亡率更高。除扩大全胃切除术(8.0%)外,2005-2009 年所有切除术类型的死亡率均下降。对于食管手术,30 天死亡率低于住院或围手术期死亡率。手术量对食管手术有保护作用,但对胃切除术没有;在胃手术中,男性和扩大全胃切除术患者的死亡率更高。

结论

对出院记录的分析允许在人群水平上研究围手术期死亡率的时间趋势(主要是食管切除术下降)和决定因素(医院量、性别和手术类型)。

相似文献

1
Mortality after esophageal and gastric cancer resection.食管癌和胃癌切除术后的死亡率。
World J Surg. 2012 Nov;36(11):2630-6. doi: 10.1007/s00268-012-1724-8.
2
Surgeon Volume and Cancer Esophagectomy, Gastrectomy, and Pancreatectomy: A Population-based Study in England.外科医生手术量与食管癌切除术、胃癌切除术和胰十二指肠切除术:一项基于英格兰人群的研究。
Ann Surg. 2016 Apr;263(4):727-32. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001490.
3
Long-Term Survival in Patients with Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer Treated with Preoperative Therapy: Do Thoracic and Abdominal Approaches Differ?接受术前治疗的胃食管交界癌患者的长期生存情况:胸段和腹段手术入路有差异吗?
Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 Feb;23(2):626-32. doi: 10.1245/s10434-015-4898-0. Epub 2015 Nov 12.
4
Anastomotic leak predicts diminished long-term survival after resection for gastric and esophageal cancer.吻合口漏预示着胃癌和食管癌切除术后长期生存率降低。
Surgery. 2016 Jul;160(1):191-203. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.02.020. Epub 2016 Apr 8.
5
Hospital volume, proportion resected and mortality from oesophageal and gastric cancer: a population-based study in England, 2004-2008.医院容量、切除比例和英格兰 2004-2008 年食管癌和胃癌死亡率:一项基于人群的研究。
Gut. 2013 Jul;62(7):961-6. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2012-303008. Epub 2012 Oct 19.
6
Effect of hospital volume on postoperative mortality and survival after oesophageal and gastric cancer surgery in the Netherlands between 1989 and 2009.1989 年至 2009 年荷兰医院容量对食管和胃癌手术后术后死亡率和生存率的影响。
Eur J Cancer. 2012 May;48(7):1004-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2012.02.064. Epub 2012 Mar 27.
7
Differences in outcomes of oesophageal and gastric cancer surgery across Europe.欧洲各地食管癌和胃癌手术结果的差异。
Br J Surg. 2013 Jan;100(1):83-94. doi: 10.1002/bjs.8966. Epub 2012 Nov 23.
8
Perioperative Treatment, Not Surgical Approach, Influences Overall Survival in Patients with Gastroesophageal Junction Tumors: A Nationwide, Population-Based Study in The Netherlands.围手术期治疗而非手术方式影响胃食管交界部肿瘤患者的总生存期:荷兰一项基于全国人群的研究
Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 May;23(5):1632-8. doi: 10.1245/s10434-015-5061-7. Epub 2016 Jan 4.
9
Failure-to-rescue in patients undergoing surgery for esophageal or gastric cancer.接受食管癌或胃癌手术患者的抢救失败情况。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2017 Oct;43(10):1962-1969. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2017.07.005. Epub 2017 Jul 29.
10
Failure to rescue patients after reintervention in gastroesophageal cancer surgery in England.英格兰胃食管癌症手术后再次介入治疗后未能抢救患者。
JAMA Surg. 2013 Mar;148(3):272-6. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2013.791.

引用本文的文献

1
Understanding Potentially Preventable Mortality Following Oesophago-Gastric Cancer Surgery: Analysis of a National Audit of Surgical Mortality.了解胃食管交界癌手术后的潜在可预防死亡率:对全国手术死亡率审计的分析。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 Aug;30(8):4950-4961. doi: 10.1245/s10434-023-13571-8. Epub 2023 May 8.
2
Morbidity and Mortality of Total Gastrectomy: a Comprehensive Analysis of 90-Day Outcomes.全胃切除术的发病率和死亡率:90 天结局的综合分析。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2019 Jul;23(7):1340-1348. doi: 10.1007/s11605-019-04228-7. Epub 2019 May 6.
3
Clinicopathology and Survival in Patients with Gastroesophageal Reflux After Radical Surgery of Proximal Gastric Cancer.

本文引用的文献

1
Effect of hospital volume on postoperative mortality and survival after oesophageal and gastric cancer surgery in the Netherlands between 1989 and 2009.1989 年至 2009 年荷兰医院容量对食管和胃癌手术后术后死亡率和生存率的影响。
Eur J Cancer. 2012 May;48(7):1004-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2012.02.064. Epub 2012 Mar 27.
2
The effect of regionalization on outcome in esophagectomy: a Canadian national study.区域化对食管癌切除术结果的影响:一项加拿大全国性研究。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2011 Aug;92(2):485-90; discussion 490. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.02.089. Epub 2011 Jun 25.
3
Quantitative assessment of the advantages of laparoscopic gastrectomy and the impact of volume-related hospital characteristics on resource use and outcomes of gastrectomy patients in Japan.
近端胃癌根治术后胃食管反流病的临床病理特征及生存分析。
Dig Dis Sci. 2018 Apr;63(4):1035-1042. doi: 10.1007/s10620-018-4960-4. Epub 2018 Feb 3.
4
Perioperative Mortality Following Oesophagectomy and Pancreaticoduodenectomy in Australia.澳大利亚食管癌切除术和胰十二指肠切除术后的围手术期死亡率
World J Surg. 2018 Mar;42(3):742-748. doi: 10.1007/s00268-017-4204-3.
5
Is a clear benefit in survival enough to modify patient access to the surgery service? A retrospective analysis in a cohort of gastric cancer patients.生存方面的明显益处是否足以改变患者获得手术治疗服务的机会?对一组胃癌患者的回顾性分析。
Gastric Cancer. 2015 Jan;18(1):159-66. doi: 10.1007/s10120-014-0346-2. Epub 2014 Jan 30.
6
Meta-analysis shows clinically relevant and long-lasting deterioration in health-related quality of life after esophageal cancer surgery.荟萃分析显示,食管癌手术后健康相关生活质量出现临床相关且持久的恶化。
Qual Life Res. 2014 May;23(4):1155-76. doi: 10.1007/s11136-013-0576-5. Epub 2013 Dec 3.
7
Surgical treatment of gastric cancer in a community hospital in Brazil: who are we treating and how?巴西一家社区医院的胃癌外科治疗:我们在治疗谁以及如何治疗?
J Gastrointest Cancer. 2013 Dec;44(4):410-6. doi: 10.1007/s12029-013-9516-4.
8
Endoscopic ultrasound in staging esophageal cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy--results of a multicenter cohort analysis.内镜超声在新辅助化疗后食管癌分期中的应用——一项多中心队列分析的结果。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2013 Jun;17(6):1050-7. doi: 10.1007/s11605-013-2189-2. Epub 2013 Apr 2.
日本腹腔镜胃切除术优势的定量评估,以及与手术量相关的医院特征对胃癌患者资源利用和结局的影响。
Ann Surg. 2011 Jan;253(1):64-70. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318204e524.
4
A decade of mortality reductions in major oncologic surgery: the impact of centralization and quality improvement.十年间肿瘤外科死亡率的降低:集中化和质量改进的影响。
Med Care. 2010 Dec;48(12):1041-9. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181f37d5f.
5
Nationwide survey and establishment of a clinical database for gastrointestinal surgery in Japan: Targeting integration of a cancer registration system and improving the outcome of cancer treatment.日本胃肠外科学临床数据库的全国性调查与建立:以癌症登记系统的整合和改善癌症治疗结果为目标。
Cancer Sci. 2011 Jan;102(1):226-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2010.01749.x. Epub 2010 Oct 20.
6
The impact of volume on outcomes after oesophageal cancer surgery.食管癌手术后手术量对治疗结果的影响。
ANZ J Surg. 2010 Sep;80(9):634-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2010.05406.x. Epub 2010 Aug 19.
7
Enforcing centralization for gastric cancer in Denmark.在丹麦实施胃癌中心化治疗。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2010 Sep;36 Suppl 1:S50-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2010.06.025. Epub 2010 Jul 2.
8
Systematic review of the impact of volume of oesophagectomy on patient outcome.食管切除术手术量对患者预后影响的系统评价。
ANZ J Surg. 2010 May;80(5):317-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2010.05276.x.
9
Disparities in utilization of high-volume hospitals for cancer surgery: results of a Korean population-based study.韩国一项基于人群的研究结果:癌症手术中高容量医院的利用差异
Ann Surg Oncol. 2010 Nov;17(11):2806-15. doi: 10.1245/s10434-010-1133-x. Epub 2010 Jun 10.
10
Surgical outcomes associated with oesophagectomy in New South Wales: an investigation of hospital volume.新南威尔士州食管切除术的手术结果:对医院容量的调查。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2010 Jun;14(6):951-7. doi: 10.1007/s11605-010-1198-7. Epub 2010 Apr 23.