• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在有转移骨病的患者中的临床获益:地舒单抗对比唑来膦酸的 3 期研究结果。

Clinical benefit in patients with metastatic bone disease: results of a phase 3 study of denosumab versus zoledronic acid.

机构信息

Division of Cancer Medicine, Department of Sarcoma Medical Oncology and Lymphoma/Myeloma, Section of Cytokines and Supportive Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA.

Department of Medical Oncology, Kantonsspital Graubünden, Chur, Switzerland.

出版信息

Ann Oncol. 2012 Dec;23(12):3045-3051. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mds175. Epub 2012 Jul 31.

DOI:10.1093/annonc/mds175
PMID:22851406
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients with metastatic bone disease are living longer in the metastatic stage due to improvements in cancer therapy, making strategies to prevent the aggravation of bone disease and its complications, such as skeletal-related events (SREs) and pain, increasingly important.

PATIENTS AND RESULTS

In this phase 3 trial in patients with advanced cancer (excluding breast and prostate cancer) or multiple myeloma, denosumab reduced the risk of radiation to bone by 22% relative to zoledronic acid (P = 0.026), prevented worsening of pain and pain interference (2-point increase in Brief Pain Inventory score; P < 0.05 versus zoledronic acid), and reduced the frequency of a shift from no/weak opioid analgesic use to strong opioids (P < 0.05 versus zoledronic acid at months 3-5). Denosumab delayed the time to moderate-to-severe pain compared with zoledronic acid in patients with mild or no pain at the baseline (P = 0.04), supporting early treatment. Health-related quality-of-life scores were similar in both groups. The number needed to treat to avoid one SRE for denosumab was 3 patient-years versus placebo and 10 patient-years versus zoledronic acid.

CONCLUSION

The use of denosumab was associated with better prevention of the complications of metastatic bone disease secondary to solid tumors or multiple myeloma versus zoledronic acid.

摘要

背景

由于癌症治疗的进步,患有转移性骨病的患者在转移性阶段的存活时间更长,因此制定策略来预防骨病及其并发症(如骨骼相关事件[SRE]和疼痛)的恶化变得越来越重要。

患者和结果

在这项针对晚期癌症(不包括乳腺癌和前列腺癌)或多发性骨髓瘤患者的 3 期试验中,与唑来膦酸相比,地舒单抗降低了 22%的放射性骨风险(P=0.026),预防了疼痛和疼痛干扰的恶化(Brief Pain Inventory 评分增加 2 分;P<0.05 与唑来膦酸相比),并减少了从无/弱阿片类镇痛药转为强阿片类药物的频率(P<0.05 与唑来膦酸在 3-5 个月时相比)。与唑来膦酸相比,地舒单抗在基线时轻度或无疼痛的患者中延迟了中度至重度疼痛的时间(P=0.04),支持早期治疗。两组患者的健康相关生活质量评分相似。与安慰剂相比,地舒单抗避免一次 SRE 所需的治疗人数为 3 患者年,而与唑来膦酸相比则为 10 患者年。

结论

与唑来膦酸相比,地舒单抗的使用与更好地预防实体瘤或多发性骨髓瘤引起的转移性骨病的并发症相关。

相似文献

1
Clinical benefit in patients with metastatic bone disease: results of a phase 3 study of denosumab versus zoledronic acid.在有转移骨病的患者中的临床获益:地舒单抗对比唑来膦酸的 3 期研究结果。
Ann Oncol. 2012 Dec;23(12):3045-3051. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mds175. Epub 2012 Jul 31.
2
Delaying skeletal-related events in a randomized phase 3 study of denosumab versus zoledronic acid in patients with advanced cancer: an analysis of data from patients with solid tumors.在一项针对晚期癌症患者的地舒单抗与唑来膦酸的随机 3 期研究中延迟骨骼相关事件:来自实体瘤患者的数据分析。
Support Care Cancer. 2014 Mar;22(3):679-87. doi: 10.1007/s00520-013-2022-1. Epub 2013 Oct 26.
3
Pain and health-related quality of life in patients with advanced solid tumours and bone metastases: integrated results from three randomized, double-blind studies of denosumab and zoledronic acid.晚期实体瘤和骨转移患者的疼痛和健康相关生活质量:地舒单抗和唑来膦酸三项随机、双盲研究的综合结果。
Support Care Cancer. 2013 Dec;21(12):3497-507. doi: 10.1007/s00520-013-1932-2. Epub 2013 Aug 22.
4
Superiority of denosumab to zoledronic acid for prevention of skeletal-related events: a combined analysis of 3 pivotal, randomised, phase 3 trials.地舒单抗优于唑来膦酸预防骨骼相关事件:3 项关键性、随机、3 期临床试验的联合分析。
Eur J Cancer. 2012 Nov;48(16):3082-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2012.08.002. Epub 2012 Sep 10.
5
Denosumab compared with zoledronic acid for the treatment of bone metastases in patients with advanced breast cancer: a randomized, double-blind study.地舒单抗对比唑来膦酸治疗晚期乳腺癌骨转移患者的随机、双盲研究。
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Dec 10;28(35):5132-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.29.7101. Epub 2010 Nov 8.
6
Economic evaluation of denosumab compared with zoledronic acid in hormone-refractory prostate cancer patients with bone metastases.地诺单抗与唑来膦酸治疗激素难治性前列腺癌骨转移患者的经济学评价
J Manag Care Pharm. 2011 Oct;17(8):621-43. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2011.17.8.621.
7
Randomized, double-blind study of denosumab versus zoledronic acid in the treatment of bone metastases in patients with advanced cancer (excluding breast and prostate cancer) or multiple myeloma.随机、双盲研究地舒单抗与唑来膦酸治疗晚期癌症(不包括乳腺癌和前列腺癌)或多发性骨髓瘤患者的骨转移。
J Clin Oncol. 2011 Mar 20;29(9):1125-32. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.31.3304. Epub 2011 Feb 22.
8
Pain outcomes in patients with advanced breast cancer and bone metastases: results from a randomized, double-blind study of denosumab and zoledronic acid.晚期乳腺癌伴骨转移患者的疼痛结局:地舒单抗和唑来膦酸的随机、双盲研究结果。
Cancer. 2013 Feb 15;119(4):832-8. doi: 10.1002/cncr.27789. Epub 2012 Sep 5.
9
Denosumab versus zoledronic acid for treatment of bone metastases in men with castration-resistant prostate cancer: a randomised, double-blind study.地舒单抗对比唑来膦酸治疗去势抵抗性前列腺癌骨转移患者的随机、双盲研究。
Lancet. 2011 Mar 5;377(9768):813-22. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62344-6. Epub 2011 Feb 25.
10
Bisphosphonates and other bone agents for breast cancer.用于乳腺癌的双膦酸盐及其他骨药物。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Feb 15(2):CD003474. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003474.pub3.

引用本文的文献

1
Usefulness of local therapy for distant metastases of differentiated thyroid cancer.局部治疗对分化型甲状腺癌远处转移的有效性
Eur Thyroid J. 2025 Jun 11;14(3). doi: 10.1530/ETJ-24-0237. Print 2025 Jun 1.
2
Development of the barriers to opioid access scale among individuals with chronic pain.慢性疼痛患者阿片类药物获取障碍量表的编制
Explor Res Clin Soc Pharm. 2025 Feb 18;18:100580. doi: 10.1016/j.rcsop.2025.100580. eCollection 2025 Jun.
3
The 2024 revised clinical guidelines on the management of thyroid tumors by the Japan Association of Endocrine Surgery.
日本内分泌外科学会2024年修订的甲状腺肿瘤管理临床指南。
Endocr J. 2025 May 7;72(5):545-635. doi: 10.1507/endocrj.EJ24-0644. Epub 2025 Mar 8.
4
Denosumab vs. Zoledronic Acid for Metastatic Bone Disease: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.地诺单抗与唑来膦酸治疗转移性骨病的比较:随机对照试验的全面系统评价和荟萃分析
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Jan 24;17(3):388. doi: 10.3390/cancers17030388.
5
Phase II study of novel CXCR2 agonist and Plerixafor for rapid stem cell mobilization in patients with multiple myeloma.新型 CXCR2 激动剂和普乐沙福在多发性骨髓瘤患者中快速动员干细胞的 II 期研究。
Blood Cancer J. 2024 Oct 9;14(1):173. doi: 10.1038/s41408-024-01152-1.
6
Local control of bone metastasis treated with palliative radiotherapy in patients with lung cancer: An observational retrospective cohort study.肺癌患者姑息性放疗对骨转移的局部控制:一项观察性回顾性队列研究。
Oncol Lett. 2023 May 31;26(1):303. doi: 10.3892/ol.2023.13889. eCollection 2023 Jul.
7
A systematic review and meta-analysis of interventional studies of bisphosphonates and denosumab in multiple myeloma and future perspectives.双膦酸盐和地舒单抗治疗多发性骨髓瘤的介入性研究的系统评价和荟萃分析及未来展望。
J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. 2022 Dec 1;22(4):596-621.
8
Quantification of Low Amounts of Zoledronic Acid by HPLC-ESI-MS Analysis: Method Development and Validation.高效液相色谱-电喷雾质谱法分析唑来膦酸低浓度的定量研究:方法的建立与验证。
Int J Mol Sci. 2022 May 25;23(11):5944. doi: 10.3390/ijms23115944.
9
Non-opioid Analgesics and Emerging Therapies.非阿片类镇痛药和新兴疗法。
Cancer Treat Res. 2021;182:125-142. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-81526-4_9.
10
Effects of Surgical Intervention for Bone Metastases on Survival in Patients with Advanced Cancer: A Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Study.骨转移瘤手术干预对晚期癌症患者生存的影响:一项基于全国人群的队列研究。
Int J Gen Med. 2021 May 3;14:1661-1671. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S307547. eCollection 2021.