Grassroots clinical research using crowdsourcing.
作者信息
Cook Chad
机构信息
Walsh University, North Canton, OH, USA.
出版信息
J Man Manip Ther. 2011 Aug;19(3):125-6. doi: 10.1179/106698111X12998437860767.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Grassroots clinical research using crowdsourcing.利用众包开展基层临床研究。
J Man Manip Ther. 2011 Aug;19(3):125-6. doi: 10.1179/106698111X12998437860767.
2
CrowdOutAIDS: crowdsourcing youth perspectives for action.众包抗击艾滋病：汇聚青年观点以采取行动
Reprod Health Matters. 2013 May;21(41):57-68. doi: 10.1016/S0968-8080(13)41687-7.
3
Scientific crowdsourcing in wildlife research and conservation: Tigers (Panthera tigris) as a case study.野生动物研究与保护中的科学众包：以老虎（ Panthera tigris ）为例
PLoS Biol. 2017 Mar 22;15(3):e2001001. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2001001. eCollection 2017 Mar.
4
The use of crowdsourcing in addiction science research: Amazon Mechanical Turk.众包在成瘾科学研究中的应用：亚马逊土耳其机器人。
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2019 Feb;27(1):1-18. doi: 10.1037/pha0000235. Epub 2018 Nov 29.
5
Are all "research fields" equal? Rethinking practice for the use of data from crowdsourcing market places.所有“研究领域”都一样吗？重新思考众包市场数据的使用实践。
Behav Res Methods. 2017 Aug;49(4):1333-1342. doi: 10.3758/s13428-016-0789-y.
6
Globalizing and crowdsourcing biomedical research.全球化与众包生物医学研究
Br Med Bull. 2016 Dec;120(1):27-33. doi: 10.1093/bmb/ldw044. Epub 2016 Nov 23.
7
Prioritizing research topics: a comparison of crowdsourcing and patient registry.优先研究课题：众包与患者登记处的比较。
Qual Life Res. 2018 Jan;27(1):41-50. doi: 10.1007/s11136-017-1566-9. Epub 2017 Apr 5.
8
The Promise and Pitfalls of Using Crowdsourcing in Research Prioritization for Back Pain: Cross-Sectional Surveys.众包在背痛研究优先级确定中的前景与陷阱：横断面调查
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Oct 6;19(10):e341. doi: 10.2196/jmir.8821.
9
Crowdsourcing in biomedicine: challenges and opportunities.生物医学中的众包：挑战与机遇。
Brief Bioinform. 2016 Jan;17(1):23-32. doi: 10.1093/bib/bbv021. Epub 2015 Apr 17.
10
Crowdsourcing in health and medical research: a systematic review.众包在健康和医学研究中的应用：系统综述。
Infect Dis Poverty. 2020 Jan 20;9(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s40249-020-0622-9.
引用本文的文献
1
A protocol for chronic pain outcome measurement enhancement by linking PROMIS-29 scale to legacy measures and improving chronic pain stratification.一项通过将患者报告结果测量信息系统-29量表与传统测量方法相联系并改善慢性疼痛分层来增强慢性疼痛结果测量的方案。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020 Oct 10;21(1):671. doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-03696-2.
本文引用的文献
1
Mode of administration bias.给药方式偏倚。
J Man Manip Ther. 2010 Jun;18(2):61-3. doi: 10.1179/106698110X12640740712617.
2
The Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative (CTTI).临床试验转化倡议（CTTI）。
Ann Ist Super Sanita. 2011;47(1):14-8. doi: 10.4415/ANN_11_01_04.
3
Why observational studies should be among the tools used in comparative effectiveness research.为什么观察性研究应该成为比较有效性研究中使用的工具之一。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Oct;29(10):1818-25. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0666.
4
The Spectral Game: leveraging Open Data and crowdsourcing for education.光谱游戏：利用开放数据和众包进行教育。
J Cheminform. 2009 Jun 26;1(1):9. doi: 10.1186/1758-2946-1-9.
5
Reaching out to collaborators: crowdsourcing for pharmaceutical research.拓展合作：药物研发中的众包模式
Pharm Res. 2010 Mar;27(3):393-5. doi: 10.1007/s11095-010-0059-0. Epub 2010 Jan 27.
6
Crowdsourcing scientific innovation.众包科学创新。
Ann Neurol. 2009 Jun;65(6):A7-8. doi: 10.1002/ana.21791.
7
Estimating the number needed to treat from continuous outcomes in randomised controlled trials: methodological challenges and worked example using data from the UK Back Pain Exercise and Manipulation (BEAM) trial.从随机对照试验的连续结果估计治疗所需人数：方法学挑战及使用英国背痛锻炼与手法治疗（BEAM）试验数据的实例分析
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2009 Jun 11;9:35. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-9-35.
8
A survey of primary care physician practice patterns and adherence to acute low back problem guidelines.一项关于初级保健医生的执业模式及对急性下背部问题指南遵循情况的调查。
Arch Fam Med. 2000 Nov-Dec;9(10):1015-21. doi: 10.1001/archfami.9.10.1015.
Zotero 插件