Di Iorio D, Henley E, Doughty A
Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Illinois College of Medicine, Rockford, USA.
Arch Fam Med. 2000 Nov-Dec;9(10):1015-21. doi: 10.1001/archfami.9.10.1015.
This study evaluated physicians' self-reported management of acute low back problems in adults and adherence with published guidelines.
Self-administered written survey based on the US Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (now the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality) guideline on acute low back problems in adults.
A region of northern Illinois with a population around 250 000 and encompassing a medium-sized city.
One hundred eighty-two primary care physicians (nonpediatric) with medical staff appointments at area hospitals.
Adherence to published recommendations.
Eighty-seven surveys were received for a 48% response rate. Overall, survey respondents recognized 5 of 7 red flags representing serious underlying abnormality 50% or less of the time. Forty percent (35/87) of physicians provided patients with written educational material, and only 25%(22/87) indicated they evaluated motor function of the fifth lumbar nerve, the most commonly affected level in intervertebral disk disease disease. About 25% (24/87) reported routine use of plain films; and 16% (14/87), routine use of computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging. Most oral medication use was consistent with recommendations, but many also used drugs conditionally discouraged by the guideline (muscle relaxants, 91% [79/87]; opioids, 62% [54/87]) or cautioned against (oral steroids, 45% [39/87]; antidepressants, 23% [20/87]; injection therapy, 52% [45/87]). Only 22% (19/87) of respondents used or recommended manipulation.
The management of patients with acute low back problems by primary care physicians differs significantly from Agency for Health Care Policy and Research guideline recommendations in several key areas that include awareness of red flags, use of medication, use of radiographic studies, the need for patient education, and the use of physical modalities. Future research should focus on the impact of guideline compliance on patient outcomes and cost-effectiveness. Arch Fam Med. 2000;9:1015-1021
本研究评估了医生自我报告的成人急性下背部问题管理情况以及对已发表指南的遵循情况。
基于美国医疗保健政策与研究机构(现为医疗保健研究与质量机构)关于成人急性下背部问题的指南进行的自填式书面调查。
伊利诺伊州北部一个约有25万人口且包含一个中型城市的地区。
在当地医院拥有医务人员任命的182名初级保健医生(非儿科)。
对已发表建议的遵循情况。
共收到87份调查问卷,回复率为48%。总体而言,调查对象在不到50%的时间里识别出7个代表严重潜在异常的警示信号中的5个。40%(35/87)的医生为患者提供了书面教育材料,只有25%(22/87)表示他们评估了第五腰神经的运动功能,这是椎间盘疾病中最常受影响的水平。约25%(24/87)报告常规使用X线平片;16%(14/87)报告常规使用计算机断层扫描或磁共振成像。大多数口服药物的使用符合建议,但许多人也使用了指南有条件不鼓励使用的药物(肌肉松弛剂,91%[79/87];阿片类药物,62%[54/87])或不建议使用的药物(口服类固醇,45%[39/87];抗抑郁药,23%[20/87];注射疗法,52%[45/87])。只有22%(19/87)的受访者使用或推荐了手法治疗。
初级保健医生对成人急性下背部问题患者的管理在几个关键领域与医疗保健政策与研究机构的指南建议有显著差异,这些领域包括对警示信号的认识、药物使用、影像学检查的使用、患者教育的必要性以及物理治疗方法的使用。未来的研究应关注遵循指南对患者结局和成本效益的影响。《家庭医学档案》。2000年;9:1015 - 1021