• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2011年约翰·M·艾森伯格患者安全与质量奖。亨利·福特医疗系统的“无伤害运动”:减少伤害、挽救生命的综合模式。地方层面患者安全与质量的创新举措。

2011 John M. Eisenberg Patient Safety and Quality Awards. The Henry Ford Health System No Harm Campaign: a comprehensive model to reduce harm and save lives. innovation in patient safety and quality at the local level.

作者信息

Conway William A, Hawkins Susan, Jordan Jack, Voutt-Goos Mary J

机构信息

Henry Ford Health System, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, USA.

出版信息

Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2012 Jul;38(7):318-27. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(12)38042-2.

DOI:10.1016/s1553-7250(12)38042-2
PMID:22852192
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In 2008 Henry Ford Health System launched its "No Harm Campaign," designed to integrate harm-reduction interventions into a systemwide initiative and, ultimately, to eliminate harm from the health care experience.

METHODS

The No Harm Campaign aims to decrease harm events through enhancing the system's culture of safety by reporting and studying harm events, researching causality, identifying priorities, and redesigning care to eliminate harm. The campaign uses a comprehensive set of 27 measures for harm reduction, covering infection-, medication-, and procedure-related harm, as well as other types of harm, all of which are combined to comprise a unique global harm score. The campaign's objective is to reduce all-cause harm events systemwide by 50% by 2013. A wide range of communication processes, from systemwide leadership retreats to daily e-mail news sent to all employees and physicians, is used to promote the campaign. In addition, the campaign is on the intranet "Knowledge Wall," where monthly dashboards, meeting minutes, and best practices and the work of our teams and collaboratives are documented and shared.

RESULTS

From 2008 through 2011, a 31% reduction in harm events and an 18% reduction in inpatient mortality occurred systemwide.

DISCUSSION

Building infrastructure, creating a culture of safety, providing employee training and education, and improving work process design are critical to systemwide implementation of harm-reduction efforts. Key actions for ongoing success focus on leadership, disseminating performance, putting everyone to work, and stealing ideas through national and local collaborations. A financial model was created to assess cost-savings of reducing harm events; early results total nearly $10 million in four years.

摘要

背景

2008年,亨利·福特医疗系统发起了“无伤害运动”,旨在将减少伤害的干预措施纳入全系统的倡议中,并最终消除医疗体验中的伤害。

方法

“无伤害运动”旨在通过报告和研究伤害事件、研究因果关系、确定优先事项以及重新设计护理以消除伤害,来增强系统的安全文化,从而减少伤害事件。该运动采用了一套全面的27项减少伤害措施,涵盖与感染、药物和手术相关的伤害以及其他类型的伤害,所有这些措施综合起来构成一个独特的全球伤害评分。该运动的目标是到2013年将全系统的全因伤害事件减少50%。通过从全系统领导力务虚会到发送给所有员工和医生的每日电子邮件新闻等广泛的沟通流程来推动该运动。此外,该运动还在内部网的“知识墙”上,在那里每月的仪表盘、会议记录、最佳实践以及我们团队和协作组织的工作都有记录和分享。

结果

从2008年到2011年,全系统的伤害事件减少了31%,住院死亡率降低了18%。

讨论

建立基础设施、营造安全文化、提供员工培训和教育以及改进工作流程设计对于全系统实施减少伤害的努力至关重要。持续成功的关键行动集中在领导力、传播绩效、让每个人都投入工作以及通过国家和地方合作借鉴想法。创建了一个财务模型来评估减少伤害事件的成本节约;早期结果显示四年内总计节省近1000万美元。

相似文献

1
2011 John M. Eisenberg Patient Safety and Quality Awards. The Henry Ford Health System No Harm Campaign: a comprehensive model to reduce harm and save lives. innovation in patient safety and quality at the local level.2011年约翰·M·艾森伯格患者安全与质量奖。亨利·福特医疗系统的“无伤害运动”:减少伤害、挽救生命的综合模式。地方层面患者安全与质量的创新举措。
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2012 Jul;38(7):318-27. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(12)38042-2.
2
2011 John M. Eisenberg Patient Safety and Quality Awards. Mentored implementation: building leaders and achieving results through a collaborative improvement model. Innovation in patient safety and quality at the national level.2011年约翰·M·艾森伯格患者安全与质量奖。指导实施:通过协作改进模式培养领导者并取得成果。国家级患者安全与质量方面的创新。
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2012 Jul;38(7):301-10. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(12)38040-9.
3
2011 John M. Eisenberg Patient Safety and Quality Awards. The effect of a novel Housestaff Quality Council on quality and patient safety. Innovation in patient safety and quality at the local level.2011年约翰·M·艾森伯格患者安全与质量奖。新型住院医师质量委员会对质量和患者安全的影响。地方层面患者安全与质量的创新。
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2012 Jul;38(7):311-7. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(12)38041-0.
4
2011 John M. Eisenberg Patient Safety and Quality Awards. Honorary Award for Lifetime Achievement. Interview by Steven Berman.2011年约翰·M·艾森伯格患者安全与质量奖。终身成就荣誉奖。史蒂文·伯曼访谈
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2012 Jul;38(7):296-300, 289.
5
2011 John M. Eisenberg Patient Safety and Quality Awards. Individual Achievement. Interview by Eric J. Thomas.2011年约翰·M·艾森伯格患者安全与质量奖。个人成就。埃里克·J·托马斯访谈
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2012 Jul;38(7):292-5, 289.
6
John M. Eisenberg Patient Safety Awards. System innovation: Veterans Health Administration National Center for Patient Safety.约翰·M·艾森伯格患者安全奖。系统创新:退伍军人健康管理局国家患者安全中心。
Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 2002 Dec;28(12):660-5. doi: 10.1016/s1070-3241(02)28071-2.
7
Building and sustaining a systemwide culture of safety.建立并维持全系统的安全文化。
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2005 Dec;31(12):684-9. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(05)31089-0.
8
2011 John M. Eisenberg Patient Safety and Quality Awards.2011年约翰·M·艾森伯格患者安全与质量奖。
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2012 Jul;38(7):291, 289.
9
We Will Not Compete on Safety: How Children's Hospitals Have Come Together to Hasten Harm Reduction.我们不会在安全方面展开竞争:儿童医院如何携手加速减少伤害。
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2018 Jul;44(7):377-388. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2018.04.005. Epub 2018 Jun 6.
10
Interview with a quality leader: Carol Wagner on Washington State Hospital Association (WSHA) and their statewide improvement. Interview by Susan V. White.对一位质量领袖的访谈:卡罗尔·瓦格纳谈华盛顿州医院协会(WSHA)及其全州范围内的改进。苏珊·V·怀特采访。
J Healthc Qual. 2012 Jan-Feb;34(1):62-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1945-1474.2011.00161.x. Epub 2011 Sep 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Dashboards for visual display of patient safety data: a systematic review.用于展示患者安全数据的仪表盘:系统评价。
BMJ Health Care Inform. 2021 Oct;28(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjhci-2021-100437.
2
Different Harm and Mortality in Critically Ill Medical vs Surgical Patients: Retrospective Analysis of Variation in Adverse Events in Different Intensive Care Units.重症内科与外科患者的不同伤害及死亡率:不同重症监护病房不良事件差异的回顾性分析
Perm J. 2018;22:16-189. doi: 10.7812/TPP/16-189.
3
Development and initial evaluation of a treatment decision dashboard.
治疗决策仪表板的开发和初步评估。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013 Apr 21;13:51. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-13-51.